Quality…you know what it is. yet you don't know what it is. But that's self contradictory. But some things are better than otheis, that is. they have more quality. But when you try to say what quality is. apart from the things that have it, it all goes poof…There's nothing to talk about… But for all practical purposes it really does exist. What else arc the grades based on? Why else would people pay fortunes for some things and throw others on the trash pile?–RobertMPersig Zen and Art of Motorcycle Maintenance
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GilletteGary and BrownMarilyn A.1986. Occupant Evaluation of Commercial Office Lighting: Volume 1, Methodology and Bibliography. Oak Ridge National Laboratory Report, TM-10264/VI.
2.
GilletteGary. 1987. Evaluating Office Lighting Environments: A Preliminary Review. LD+A17(no.5).
3.
GreerNora Richter. Lighting Design: State of the Art. Architecture, October, 1984.
4.
LamWilliam C.1977. Perception and Lighting as Form givers for Architecture.New York: McGraw-Hill.
5.
McGuinnessWilliam J., SteinBenjamin and ReynoldsJohn. 1980. Mechanical and Electrical Equipment for Buildings.New York: John Wiley.
6.
MaransRobert W. and SpreckelmeyerKent. 1981. Evaluating Built Environments: A Behavioral Approach.Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, The University of Michigan.
7.
MaransRobert W.1985. Evaluating Lighting Quality: Data Collection Procedures.Ann Arbor: APRL, College of Architecture and Urban Planning.
8.
PersigRobert M.1975. Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance.New York: Bantam Books.
9.
WagnerWalter F.Jr.Lighting: An Art Supported by Technology. Architectural Record, April, 1985.
