Basic systems are compared for benefits in uniformity, no glare, architectural accent and energy savings
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LemonsT. M. “Effective use of ESI,” LD&A, Vol. 3, No. 1, January 1973, p. 45.
2.
RuudA. J. “Creative classroom lighting,” LD&A, Vol. 6 No. 3, March 1976, p. 12.
3.
HerstD. J., and NgaiP. V. “A ranking system vased on visual performance potential and visual comfort,” LD&A, Vol. 8 No. 8, August 1978, p. 45.
4.
MerkmaleB. “Windowless factory with indirect lighting,” Lighttechnik, Vol. 30 No. 1, January 1978, p. 24.
5.
FlorenceN. “Comparison of the energy effectiveness of office lighting systems,” LD&A, Vol. 6 No. 9, September 1976, p. 31.
6.
“Recommended practice for the specification of an ESI rating in interior spaces when specific task locations are unknown,” Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society, Vol. 6 No. 2, January 1977, p. 111.
7.
HughesP. E. and McNelisJ. F. “Lighting, productivity, and the work environment.” LD&A, Vol. 8 No. 12, December 1978, p. 32.
8.
SquillaceS. S. and WebsterJ. C. “Analyzing an automotive drafting task for visual performance,” LD&A, Vol. 7 No. 1, January 1977, p. 26.
9.
RobinsonA. V. and LemonsT. M., “A guide for the lighting design of open plan offices,” A paper presented at the IES Conference, Atlantic City, N.J., September 1979.
