Wright, Frank Lloyd, The natural house, Horizon Press, 1954
2.
Gropius, Walter, Scope of Total Architecture, Collier Books, 1962
3.
Ibid
4.
Department of Scientific and Industrial Research, Post-war Building Study 30: The lighting of buildingsHMSO, 1952
5.
Ministry of Public Building and Works, Post-war Building Study 16: Business Buildings (report by a committee convened by the RIBA 1944, reprinted 1952 HMSO)
6.
Treasury Study Group Report: Working conditions in the Civil Service, HMSO, 1947
7.
CroghanDavidDr., “Daylight and the form of office buildings,” AJ22, Dec. 1965
8.
Forrest, Gordon, The Office—Environmental Plannings, National Design Council, Ottawa, April 1969
9.
van NoortH. R., Etude sur I'influence de la lumiere du jour sur I'etat de sante des ouvriers, Conseil de I'Europe, 1965
10.
GalbreathMurdoch, Daylight Design, division of Building Research, National Research Council, Ottawa, May 1961
11.
MarkusT. A. “The significance of sunshine and view for office workers,” Sunlight in Buildings—The International Commission on Illumination Symposium, Bouwcentrum International, Rotterdam, 1967
12.
WellsB. W. P, “Subjective responses to the lighting installations in a modern office and their implications,” Building Science, 1965
13.
BroadbentGeoffrey, Design in Architecture, John Wiley & Sons, 1973
14.
WheelerLawrenceDr., The Office Environment. ISD, Inc., 1969
15.
MeddD. L., and MeddM. B., in review of University of Michigan study (see Reference 17).
16.
HardyA. C., Report of discussion on “Daytime lighting of buildings: Report of an IES symposium,” Ltg Res & Tech, vol. 6, no. 2, 1974
17.
University of Michigan: The effect of windowless classrooms on elementary school- children. The Architectural Research Library, Department of Architecture, The University of Michigan, 1965
18.
LongmoreJ., and Ne'emanE., Report of discussion on symposium “Environmental research in real buildings” by CIE Committee TC3.3, Light and Lighting, Nov., 1973
19.
Capital Region, Department of Public Works of Canada, Report:—Great Britain and European installations visited by accommodation management committee group. Department of National Defence. Ottawa
20.
CowleyMichael, “Trappings of Power,” Weekend Magazine, vol. 24, no. 17, April 27, 1974
21.
Environmental Systems International Inc; Robbie, Vaughan & Williams; Industrial Interiors Limited; Report: Environmental Requirements of Office Users, Department of Industry, Trade and Commerce, and the Design Council, June, 1971
22.
MarkusT. A., “The function of windows—a reappraisal,” Build. Sci., 2, 97, 1967
23.
HardyA. C., and O'SullivanP. E., Insolation and Fenestration, Oriel Press, 1967
24.
KeighleyE. C., “Visual requirements and reduced fenestration in office buildings— a study of window shape,” Buil. Sci., 8. 311, 1973
25.
Ne'emanE., and HopkinsonR. G., “The determintion of minimum acceptable window size,” Light. Res. Tech., 2, 17, 1970 26.
26.
TrigwellK., in discussion on paper “Internal services which influence the interior environment” by ChandlerT. J., ButtonD., and SherrattA. F. C., Ltg. Res. Tech., 2, 4,1970
27.
NobleJ., “The How and Why of Behaviour: Social Psychology for the Architect,” AJ, 6 March, 1963
28.
Quoted by BroadbentG. (see Reference 13).
29.
BellJ. A. M. “Daylighting of Buildings,” Ltg. Res. Tech., 5, 4, 1973