Avatar Environmental, LCC, EDM International, Inc., Pandion Systems, Inc., 2004. Notice of inquiry comment review, Avian/communication tower collisions, prepared for Federal Communications Commission: West Chester, PA.
2.
AveryM, SpringerPF, CasselJF, 1976. The effects of a tall tower on nocturnal bird migration - A portable ceilometer study. Auk, 93, 281–291.
3.
American Ornithologists' Union, 1998. Check-list of North American birds.7th ed.American Ornithologists' Union:Washington, DC.
4.
BeasonRC, 2003. Through a bird's eye—avian sensory perception. Proceedings of the Bird Strike Committee USA/Canada 2003 Conference.
5.
BeasonRC, 1999. The bird brain: magnetic cues, visual cues, and radio frequency (RF) effects. Transcripts of Proceedings of the Workshop on Avian Mortality at Communication Towers, August II, 1999, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.EvansWR and ManvilleAMII (eds.).
6.
BowmakerJK and DartnallHJA, 1980. Visual pigments of rods and cones in a human retina. Physiol. Lond.298, 501–511.
7.
EmmertonJ. and DeliusJD, 1980. Wavelength discrimination in the visible and ultraviolet spectrum by pigeons, Journal of Comparative Physiology, A141, 47–52.
8.
Federal Communications Commission (FCC), 2003. Notice of Inquiry In the Matter of the Effects of Communications Towers on Migratory Birds. WT Docket No. 03-187. Federal Register Notice August 20, 2003.
9.
Federal Aviation Administration, 2000, Advisory Circular (AC) 70/7460-IK: Obstruction Marking and Lighting.
10.
GraberRR, 1968. Nocturnal migration in Illinois-Different points of view, Wilson Bulletin, 80, 36–71.
11.
GastmanEA, 1886. Thousands of birds killed at electric light towers in Decatur, IL. Amer. Nat.20: 981.
12.
HartNS.PartridgeJC, CuthillIC, 1998. Visual pigments, oil droplets and cone photoreceptor distribution in the European starling (Sturnus Vulgaris), The Journal of Experimental Biology, 201, 1433–1446.
13.
KerlingerP, 2000. Avian mortality at communication towers: a review of recent literature, research and methodology, Prepared for the United States Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Migratory Bird Management:Washington DC.
14.
LPP, 2005. Scientific basis to establish policy regulating communications towers to protect migratory birds: response to Avatar environmental, LLC, Report regarding migratory bird collisions with communication towers, WT Docket No. 03-187, Federal Communications Commission Notice of Inquiry, Prepared for American Bird Conservancy Defenders of Wildlife forest Conservation Council, The Humane Society of the United States, Land Protection Partners:LA, CA
15.
LarkinRP, 1999. Investigating the behavioral mechanisms of tower kills, Transcripts of Proceedings of the Workshop on Avian Mortality at Communication Towers, August II, 1999, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.EvansWR and ManvilleAMII (eds.).
16.
NAB, CTIA, 2005. Reply comments of the National Association of Broadcasters and CTIA-The Wireless Association on the Avatar report, WT Docket No. 03-187
17.
OgdenLJE.1996. Collision course: The hazards of lighted structures and windows to migrating birds. World Wildlife Fund Canada and the Fatal Light Awareness Program.Toronto, Ontario.46.
18.
VarelaFJ, PalaciosAG, GoldsmithTH, 1993. Color vision of birds, ZeiglerHP.BischofH-J (eds.), Vision, Brain and Behavior in Birds,The MIT Press:Cambridge, MA.
19.
VerheijenFJ, 1958. The mechanisms of the trapping effect of artificial light sources upon animals, Archieves Nerlandaises de Zoologie, 13, 1–107
20.
VorobyevM., OsorioDA, BennettTD, MarshallNJ, and CuthillIC, 1998. Tetrachromacy, oil droplets and bird plumage colours. J. Comp. Physiol. A183: 621–633.
21.
OweirRD, 1976. Annotated bibliography of bird kills at man-made obstacles: a review of the state of the art and solutions. Department of fisheries and the Environment, Environmental Management Service. Canadian Wildlife Service, Ontario Region.Ottawa.
