Abstract
Using the Bi-Digital O-Ring Test Resonance Phenomena between two identical substances, the author has been successfully and non-invasively screening for various malignant tumors, cardiovascular diseases, Alzheimer’s disease, and autism in their early stages before any standard laboratory test can detect them. This was performed without even touching the patient using substances that are known to increase significantly in each specific disease as a reference control substance. If the same substance exists inside the body, between the two identical substances there will be electro-magnetic field resonance. When the amounts are identical, they produce the maximum resonance. Using this method, we can estimate the approximate amounts of specific disease-related molecules inside the body.
For the screening of malignant tumors, in the past, the author used as reference control substances 60 ng of Oncogen C-fos Aba or Integrin α5β1. Then, a red spectrum low intensity laser beam was projected to the right and left arms, suprasternal notch, umbilicus, and right and left inguinal areas. If there is strong resonance, then one can suspect the approximate location of the malignant tumor. The average screening requires about 6 minutes. When suprasternal notch has a strong positive response, then the presence of the malignant tumor above the neck has to be ruled out. To do this, additional right and left ear lobules will be examined. However, our recent study indicates that in Asbestos-induced mesothelioma, there was no significant increase in Oncogen C-fos Abi or Integrin α5β1. Therefore, mesothelioma will be missed, if we only use these two substances. Our recent study indicates that mesothelioma and all of the other well- known cancers of the rest of the body have very high amounts of Asbestos within the cancer tissue. For example, Asbestos in normal parts of the body is usually less than 0.05 mg BDORT units. However, most of the malignant tumors had Asbestos levels of between 0.2-0.3 mg BDORT units of Asbestos. Most mesotheliomas have average Asbestos levels of 0.5-0.7 mg BDORT units. Therefore, if one finds an Asbestos level of around 0.25 mg, there is a high probability of the existence of one of the various well-known malignant tumors. If one finds Asbestos levels of around 0.5 mg or higher, it is most likely Asbestos-induced mesothelioma is in the area.
Also, when Asbestos levels are high in the eye or nose, there is often a high probability of Astrocytoma of the brain, and also an increased probability of Glioblastoma Multiforme (which is the most malignant brain tumor). In addition, there is also a high probability of developing cataract of the eyes. When Asbestos is very high at the hippocampus, there is a very high probability of developing Alzheimer’s disease for adults, and autism for young children. Both Alzheimer’s disease and Autism often feature markedly increased metal deposits of Al or Hg, with or without increasing Pb. There is also increased β-Amyloid (1-42), and decreased Acetylcholine with increased TXB2, indicating the presence of circulatory disturbances. All of these findings are common in both Alzheimer’s disease patients and Autism patients. Because of this, the author often refers to Autism as Juvenile Alzheimer’s Disease.
When Asbestos levels are high at the suprasternal notch, there is a high incidence of malignant tumors or mesothelioma in the chest cavity and upper respiratory tract, as well as the esophagus. If there is increased Asbestos in the umbilicus, there is a high probability of malignant tumors of the G.I. system or mesothelioma of the peritoneum. If there is high Asbestos in the inguinal area, there is a high probability of malignant tumors in the descending colon, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, etc. When Asbestos is high in the left ventricle, there is a high probability of developing a failing heart, myocardial infarct, or narrowing of the coronary artery.
In the past, there was a general belief that in order for Asbestos to induce mesothelioma it would take 10-20 years. However, the destruction of the World Trade Center clearly indicated that inhalation of large amounts of Asbestos (as well as Hg and dioxins) can induce mesothelioma in less than 5 years. Several workers died within 5 years of exposure. It was also generally believed that Asbestos is difficult to remove. However, our study indicated that Asbestos deposits in our body can be removed relatively safely and effectively by a number of methods. These methods include:
1) one optimal dose of DHEA 2) periodic repeated intake of a special Cilantro tablet 3) application of (+) Qigong energy-stored paper 4) application of special (+) solar energy-stored paper
Concerning one optimal dose of DHEA, the author found that, in all of the patients with increased Asbestos, there were circulatory disturbances indicated by the presence of increased TXB2. Our previous study found that one optimal dose of DHEA improved most circulatory disturbances significantly. Wc found that many doctors are treating with DHEA as a miracle drug for the purpose of rejuvenation by recommending a minimum 25 mg daily (and in some cases 50-100 mg daily). However, our study clearly indicated that the optimal dose of DHEA for most adults is anywhere from 3-12.5 mg, and that 25 mg is an excessive dose (more than 2 times the optimal dose). An overdose of 25 mg or more will result in the complete opposite effects of one optimal dose of DHEA. When we gave one optimal dose of DHEA, not only did many of the pathological findings of Alzheimer’s disease and autism markedly improve due to the significant improvement of circulation in the brain and significant increase in Acetylcholine, but intractable pain also reduced significantly in patients that had it. The effect of one optimal dose of DHEA produced a very significant reduction of abnormally deposited Asbestos (often 70- 95%) from the pathological area of the body. Large amounts of Asbestos are excreted in the urine along with bacteria and viruses within 4 hours of taking one optimal dose of DHEA.
The most important thing is how to determine the optimal dose of DHEA. The author’s definition of optimal dose is
When the author compared these 4 methods of removing Asbestos, the most efficient method was the application of Special (+) Solar Energy-Stored Paper. The 2nd most efficient method was the application of (+) Qigong Energy-Stored Paper. The 3rd was the intake of the special Cilantro tablet, and the 4th was one optimal dose of DHEA. All of the methods produced significant reduction of Asbestos, though some of them were more efficient than the others. For general purposes, one optimal dose of DHEA has the greatest beneficial effect. It is important to maintain the increased normal cell telomere effect by one optimal dose. Some pain medications inhibit the normal cell telomere increasing effect of one optimal dose of DHEA, and enhance the growth of cancer cell telomere.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
