DIAGNOSTIC DISSOCIATION BETWEEN MODERN MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES AND BDORT TECHNIQUE: MY EXPERIENCE AND PRACTICAL PITFALLS

Abstract

Clinical diagnoses achieved by modern medical technologies and Bi-Digital O-Ring Test (OMURA,Y.,1977-2006;BDORT) technique are occasionally dissociated in practical clinical situations. This uncertain discrepancy often leads to patients’ confusion: “why”, and “in which information they need to believe.” Therefore, it is very important to consider its pitfail and borderline analysis for further advancement in future medicine.

This paper aims to presents our extensive clinical cases in treatment of cancer and/or patients, who observed discrepancies in these different diagnostic procedures.

In conclusion, diagnostic pitfall in BDORT was (1) difficulty in precise tumor configuration and/or relation ship between tumor and surrounding tissue (or pattern?), thus additional modem imaging technology, endoscope examination, and biochemical data analysis are needed to design the best treatment plan.

In contrast, diagnostic pitfalls of modem medicine were: (1) ORT diagnosed benign, yet histopathology analysis was malignant. Sometime this phenomenon inverted each other, (2) final clinical diagnosis is difficult despite remarkable patient complaint, (3) difficult to identify a primary focus, (4) difficult to detect micro-metastases, and (5) time-consuming nature in case patient developed clinical complaints.

Dissociation between pathological diagnosis and of BDORT should be solved.

Conclusions:

When BDORT reveals negative for cancer reaction despite histological diagnosis of cancer, the difference needs to be thoroughly investigated.

• 1)

  Even if cancer spontaneously disappears or activity of cancer turns to be negative by BDORT, cancer cells can be observed histologically for a long time. In modem medicine, cancer is diagnosed by morphological changes of cells, which may sometimes lead to inappropriate therapy.

• 2)

  BDORT elucidated that Staphylococcus aureus, Sreptococcus A&B, CMV, Chlamydia trachomatis, and Candida albicans, etc. present in association with cancer, were persistently observed after cancer was eliminated, which was the cause of proliferation.

• 3)

  It is natural that diagnosis by BDORT that detects the activity of cancer is sometimes inconsistent with that by medicine based solely on morphology, and it is anticipated that a diagnostic method combining both will be developed in the future.