Influence of Pathological Biological Information on Diagnosis and Drug Selection by the Bi-Digital O-Ring Test (BDORT). A Prelimtinary Report.

Abstract

Purpose:

We had been reported a phenomenon that some pathological biological information of subject was transmitted to and shared among family members and also intermediary and examiner performing BDORT at 3rd international symposium ¹⁾ and the 8th/9th annual meeting^{2, 3)} on the Bi-Digital O-ring Test (OMURA, Y. 1997-2002; BDORT). We studied the influence by the phenomenon on diagnosis and drug selection using BDORT.

Subject and Method:

Patients and their X Ray films whose BDORT diagnoses did not accord with final diagnoses were enrolled; (1) A family with chronic cough consisting of two brothers of 26 and 24 y.o., their father of 58 y.o. and their mother of 57 y.o., (2-a) 81 y. o. lung TB male who had been diagnosed as lung cancer by BDORT. (2-b) 75 y.o. lung cancer male who was diagnosed as lung TB by BDORT on X ray films. We performed BDORT resonant test and drug compatibility test after Omura’s original method ⁴⁾ .

Result:

(1) The younger brother and the elder brother originally showed compatibility with Bakumondo-to (TJ-29) and Mao-bushi-saishin-to (TJ127), respectively. As these drugs were not effective, we re-evaluated them using BDORT considering a possibility of error reaction by transmitting and sharing of the pathological biological information among their family members. To eliminate the influence of the information from their family members, we tried to approach magnet to them though, we obtained the same results as before. We also tried to select sugar, water and salts as sample, subsequently. When we used sample salt with these kampo medicine, the drug compatibility changed; from Bakumon-do-to to Sho-seiryu-to (TJ19) in the younger brother, and from Mao-bushi-saishin-to to Bakumon-do-to in the elder brother. The resonant reaction changed from Mycoplasma pneumoniae to RS virus in the younger brother and from unknown pathogen to Mycoplasma pneumoniae in the elder brother. They improved by changing drugs as following the results. The results of BDORT were not changed by adding sample salt in their parents. Although the father had compatibility with Mao-bushi-saishin-to, pathogen was not clear by resonant reaction tests. The mother had compatibility with clarithromycin, and had resonant reaction to Chlamydia pneumoniae. These results suggest that the pathological biological information of the father was transmitted to and shared by the elder brother whose original one was transmitted to and shared by the younger brother. (2) After establishing final diagnoses in patients 2-a and 2-b, we re-evaluated using BDORT but we obtained the same results as before. Both of drug compatibility test and resonant test changed to accord with the final diagnoses by the use of sample salt. The source of the former pathological biological information was unclear because we could not test for their family members.

Discussion:

It is possible that we evaluate the pathological biological information different from his own person, when BDORT diagnosis does not accord with the final diagnosis. The information may be transmitted through biological communication to and shared by the subject and maintained in some time. Therefore, we need some treatment in performing BDORT to obtain proper diagnosis.