G-7 Ministerial Conference on the Information Society (1995). Chair"s conclusions. http://www.ispo.cec.be/g7/g7main.html.
2.
Borgman, C.L. (in press). Information Retrieval or Information Morass? Implications of Library Automation and Computing Networks in Central and Eastern Europe for the Creation of a Global Information Infrastructure . Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Society for Information Science, Chicago, October 9-12, 1995.
3.
Higginbotham, B.B., and S. Bowdoin.Access versus Assets. Chicago: American Library Association, 1993.
4.
LaMarche, G. et al. (1995). Open letter to Vice President of the United States Al Gore regarding the G-7 Ministerial Conference on the Information Society, Brussels February 25-26, 1995. Washington, DC : Human Rights Watch, February 22, 1995.
5.
Intellectual Freedom Committee, American Library Association (1995). Access to electronic information, services, and networks: An interpretation of the Bill of Rights. URL: http://www.intac.com/kgs/ifc/.
6.
Internet Society. (1995, January). Latest Internet host survey available: The Internet is growing faster than ever. URL: http://www.nw.com/zone/WWW./isoc-pr-9501.txt .
7.
Zonis, M., and D. Semler.The East European Opportunity: The Complete Business Guide and Sourcebook. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1992.
8.
Levy, D.M. and C.C. Marshall. "Going Digital: A Look at the Assumptions underlying Digital Libraries." Communications of the ACM38 (4), 77-84 (1995).
9.
Mumford, L.Technics and Civilization. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1934.
10.
Pool, I. de S. , et al. "Foresight and Hindsight: The Case of the Telephone." In The Social Impact of the Telephone, Cambridge: MIT Press, 1976.
11.
Roszak, T.The Cult of Information: A Neo-Luddite Treatise on High Tech, Artificial Intelligence, and the True Art of Thinking. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1994.
12.
Talbott, S.L.The Future Does Not Compute: Transcending the Machine in our Midst. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly & Associates, 1995.
13.
Kahin, B., ed. (in press). Interoperability and the economics of information infrastructure. Harvard Information Infrastructure Series. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14.
National Research Council; Commission on Physical Sciences, Mathematics, and Applications; Computer Science and Telecommunications Board; NRENAISSANCE Committee, L. Kleinrock, Chair. Realizing the Information Future: The Internet and Beyond. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1994 .
15.
Leazer, G.H. and M. Rohdy. "The Bibliographic Control of Foreign Monographs: A Review and Baseline Study." Library Resources & Technical Services, 39 (1): 29-42 (1994).
16.
Rozsa, G. "Hungarian Research Libraries: Their Contribution to the European Culture and Cultural Heritage." Liber Quarterly2 (2): 33-40 (1992).
17.
Svoboda, M.Automation in Czech Libraries. Prague: National Library, 1992.
18.
Tóth, G. "Problems in Hungarian Library Policy." Libri40 (4): 336-349 (1990).
19.
Wolosz, J. "The Role of National Libraries and the Centralized Management System in the Countries of Eastern Europe." Alexandria 3 (3): 131-148 (1991).
20.
Riecken, R., ed. "Intelligent Agents." [Special issue]. Communications of the ACM37 (7): 18-147 (1994).
21.
Jacobson, R.L. "Taming the Internet."Chronicle of Higher Education, 41 (32): 29-31 (1995).
22.
Buckland, M.K. "Information as Thing." Journal of the American Society for Information Science42 (5): 351-360 (1991).
23.
Barlow, J.P. "The New Economy of Ideas." Wired2 (84) (1994).
24.
Borgman, C.L. "Why Are Online Catalogs Hard To Use? Lessons Learned from Information Retrieval Studies." Journal of the American Society for Information Science37(6): 387-400 (1986).
25.
Hildreth, C. R., ed. The Online Catalogue: Developments and Directions. London: The Library Association, 1989.
26.
Hancock-Beaulieu, M. "A Comparative Transaction Log Analysis of Browsing and Search Formulation in Online Catalogs." Automated Library and Information Systems27 (3): 269-280 (1993).
27.
Hancock-Beaulieu, M. "Online Catalogs: A Case for the User." In: The Online Catalog: Developments and Directions. In C. Hildreth, ed. London: The Library Association Publishing Ltd., 1989.
28.
Borgman, C.L. and C.R. Hildreth. "Why Are Online Catalogs still Hard to Use?" Manuscript submitted for publication, 1995.
29.
Borgman, C.L. "The User's Mental Model of an Information Retrieval System: An Experiment on a Prototype Online Catalog." International Journal of Man-Machine Studies24: 47-64 (1986).
30.
Belkin, N.J. , R.N. Oddy, and H.M. Brooks. "ASK for Information Retrieval: Part I. Background and Theory." Journal of Documentation, 38(2): 61-71 (1982).
31.
Bates, M.J. "Factors Affecting Subject Catalog Search Success ". Journal of the American Society for Information Science28 (3): 161-169 (1977).
32.
Bates, M.J. "The Fallacy of the Perfect Thirty-item Online Search." RQ24(1): 43-50 (1984).
33.
Kuhlthau, C.C. "Inside the Search Process: Information Seeking from the User's Perspective." Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 42(5), 361-371 (1991).
34.
Taylor, R.S. "Question-Negotiation and Information Seeking in Libraries." College and Research Libraries29 (3): 178-194 (1968).
35.
Bates, M.J. "Subject Access in Online Catalogs: A Design Model." Journal of the American Society for Information Science37 (6): 357-376 (1986).
36.
Bates, M.J. "The Design of Browsing and Berry-picking Techniques for the Online Search Interface." Online Review13 (5): 407-424. (1989).
37.
Borgman, C.L. , A.L. Gallagher, S.G. Hirsh, and V.A. Walter. (In press). "Children's Searching Behavior On Browsing And Keyword Online Catalogues: The Science Library Catalogue Project ." Journal of the American Society for Information Science .
38.
Hildreth, C.R.Intelligent Interfaces and Retrieval Methods for Subject Searching in Bibliographic Retrieval Systems. Washington DC: Cataloging Distribution Services, Library of Congress, 1989.
39.
Smith, Philip J., et al. "Bibliographic Information Retrieval Systems: Increasing Cognitive Compatibility." Information Services and Use7 (4-5): 95-102 (1987).