This paper proposes a publicness evaluation model for libraries (PEML) designed in the light of various theoretical approaches and models applied to public spaces. The PEML captures the multidimensional nature of publicness, because it embraces the concept of a vertical and a horizontal structure with geographical and non-geographical, material and non-material dimensions, for a comprehensive understanding. The PEML can be broken down into its component units, so it can be used for individual analysis of each of the ways in which a library is public: as a space, as a collective subject, and as an object of debate and representation. The PEML proposal is a milestone in library evaluation, because it is the first model of its kind and because it is conceived to evaluate all public access libraries, not just government-run libraries.
Álvarez ZapataDGiraldo GiraldoYNOcampo MolinaNY, et al. (2009) Representaciones bibliotecarias sobre la biblioteca pública, la lectura, el lector, la promoción y la animación a la lectura en Medellín, Colombia. Investigación bibliotecológica23(49): 197–240.
2.
Baringo EzquerraD (2013) La tesis de la producción del espacio en Henri Lefebvre y sus críticos: Un enfoque a tomar en consideración. Quid 16 Revista del Área de Estudios Urbanos3: 119–135.
3.
BennSIGausGF (1983) The public and the private concepts and action. In: Public and Private in Social Life. New York: St Martin’s Press, 3–25.
CarmonaM (2014) The place-shaping continuum: A theory of urban design process. Journal of Urban Design19(1): 2–36.
6.
CarmonaM (2015) Re-theorising contemporary public space: A new narrative and a new normative. Journal of Urbanism: International Research on Placemaking and Urban Sustainability8(4): 373–405.
7.
CarrS (1992) Public Space. New York: Cambridge University Press.
8.
Chang A (2023) How is the public imagined by public librarians? A case study of one US American public library during the COVID–19 pandemic. Library Philosophy and Practice (7693): 1–15.
9.
Ciorli M (2018) (Un)certain access to public space: The public library and its relation with stigmatised patrons. Master Thesis, Universtá Degli Studi Di Trento.
10.
Corsín JiménezA (2003) On space as a capacity. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute9(1): 137–153.
11.
De MagalhãesC (2010) Public space and the contracting-out of publicness: A framework for analysis. Journal of Urban Design15(4): 559–574.
12.
De MagalhãesCCarmonaM (2009) Dimensions and models of contemporary public space management in England. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management52(1): 111–129.
13.
De MagalhãesCFreire TrigoS (2017) ‘Clubification’ of urban public spaces? The withdrawal or the re-definition of the role of local government in the management of public spaces. Journal of Urban Design22(6): 738–756.
14.
DietrichUErtoGK (2017) Liveable public urban spaces: Criteria for assessment and design. WIT Transactions on Ecology and The Environment223: 273–284.
15.
ElmborgJK (2011) Libraries as the spaces between us. Reference & User Services Quarterly50(4): 338–350.
16.
Esquivel CarreónGMarzal García-QuismondoMÁ (2026) The configuration of publicness in public access libraries. Libri76(1): 1–28.
17.
FainSM (2004) The construction of public space. In: Callejo PérezDMFainSMSlater JudithJ (eds) Pedagogy of Place: Seeing Space as Cultural Counterpoints. New York: Peter Lang AG, 9–33. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/42978542 (accessed 31 May 2025).
18.
García GarcíaA (2011) The value of a geographical perspective on the analysis of urban public spaces. Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles (55): 439–442.
HuMChenR (2018) A framework for understanding sense of place in an urban design context. Urban Science2(34): 1–19.
22.
IvesonK (2007) Publics and the City. Oxford: Blackwell.
23.
Kim H and Kim G (2023) A study on measuring the publicness of public libraries: Based on the perception of local residents. Journal of the Korean Society for Library and Information Science 57(2): 241–269.
24.
KingsburyBMaisleyN (2021) Infrastructures and laws: Publics and publicness. Annual Review of Law and Social Science17(1): 353–373.
25.
LangstraatFVan MelikR (2013) Challenging the ‘end of public space’: A comparative analysis of publicness in British and Dutch urban spaces. Journal of Urban Design18(3): 429–448.
26.
LefebvreH (2013) La producción del espacio(trans. E Martínez Gutiérrez). Colección entre líneas. Madrid: Capitán Swing Libros, S.L. Available at: http://papers.uab.cat/article/view/v3-lefebvre (accessed 9 July 2025).
27.
LopesMSantos CruzSPinhoP (2020) Publicness of contemporary urban spaces: Comparative study between Porto and Newcastle. Journal of Urban Planning & Development146(4): 1–13.
28.
LowS (2010) On the Plaza: The Politics of Public Space and Culture. Austin: University of Texas Press.
29.
LowS (2017) Spatializing Culture: the Ethnography of Space and Place. Abingdon: Routledge.
30.
MadanipourA (2003) Public and Private Spaces of the City. London: Taylor & Francis Group.
31.
MorshedASamiMIslamN, et al. (2024) Evaluating publicness of public space and its transforming pattern: A case of the Inner Courtyard at Khulna New Market. FARU Journal11(2): 53–62.
32.
NémethJSchmidtS (2011) The privatization of public space: Modeling and measuring publicness. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design38(1): 5–23.
33.
NewmanJClarkeJ (2009) Publics, Politics and Power: Remaking the Public in Public Services. London: Sage Publications.
34.
Quinn B and Ryan T (2022) The publicness of local libraries: Insights from local libraries turned festival venues in Dublin. In: Smith A, Osborn G and Quinn B (eds) Festivals and the City: The Contested Geographies of Urban Events. London: University of Westminster Press, 77–92. Available at: https://www.fulcrum.org/concern/file_sets/4b29b9082 (accessed 11 July 2024).
35.
Quintero LópezDL (2024) La resistencia espacial: Una práctica de biblioteca. Palabra Clave (La Plata)14(1): 1–14.
36.
VigneswaranDIvesonKLowS (2017) Problems, publicity and public space: A resurgent debate. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space49(3): 496–502.
37.
WeintraubJKumarK (1997) Public and Private in Thought and Practice: Perspectives on a Grand Dichotomy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
38.
ZhuJ (2022) Rethinking publicness: Making public space in an ‘excellent global city’ and the rhetoric and reality of people-orientedness. Arbor Ciencia, Pensamiento y Cultura198(803–804): 1–16.
39.
ZhuJ (2023) Public space and its publicness in people-oriented urban regeneration: A case study of Shanghai. Journal of Urban Affairs47(7): 1–20.
