The FAIRification process for data stewardship: A comprehensive discourse on the implementation of the FAIR principles for data visibility,interoperability and management

Abstract

This article discusses the importance of good data management for knowledge discovery and innovation. It outlines the FAIR principles, which provide guidelines for publishing digital resources in a way that makes the data findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable. Using a systematic literature review, the study focuses on the implementation of these principles in research data management and their applicability in data repositories and data centres. It highlights the importance of implementing these principles systematically, allowing stakeholders to choose the minimum requirements and provide a vision for implementing them in data repositories and data centres. The article also highlights the steps in the FAIRification process, which can enhance data interoperability, discovery and reusability. The paper is unique in that it explores how implementing FAIR principles impacts data management for data hosting platforms on a global scale.

Keywords

FAIR principles research data management data stewardship metadata interoperability findability accessibility

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adeleke

Otoo

(2014) An integrated metadata access infrastructure for a network of federated curated data repositories. OCLC Systems and Services 30(2): 91–107.

Ananthakrishnan

Chard

D’Arcy

, et al. (2020) An open ecosystem for pervasive use of persistent identifiers. In: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2020: Catch the Wave (PEARC'20). New York, USA: Association of Computing Machinery, 99–105.

Anjaria

(2020) Computational implementation and formalism of FAIR data stewardship principles. Data Technologies and Applications 54(2): 193–214.

Ayris

Berthou

Bruce

, et al. (2016) Realising the European open science cloud. European Union. https://doi.org/10.2777/940154

Bahim C, Casorrán-Amilburu C, Dekkers M, et al. (2020) The FAIR data maturity model: An approach to harmonise FAIR assessments. Data Science Journal 19(41): 1–7.

Bender

Blaschke

Hirsch

(2022) Data production in a digitised age: The need. Technical report 2022-02, Deutsche Bundesbank, Germany. Available at: https://www.bundesbank.de/resource/blob/745172/b6f5ae48e84585baad4c9d2ba7944e46/mL/2022-02-workflows-data.pdf

Betancort Cabrera

Bongartz

Dörrenbächer

, et al. (2020) White Paper on implementing the FAIR principles for data in the social, behavioural, and economic sciences. RatSWD Working Paper no. 274, Rat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD), Berlin, Germany. Available at: https://www.konsortswd.de/en/publication/wp274-2020/

Bishop

Hank

(2018) Measuring FAIR principles to inform fitness for use. International Journal of Digital Curation 13(1): 35–46.

Bloemers

Montesanti

(2020) The FAIR funding model: Providing a framework for research funders to drive the transition toward FAIR data management and stewardship practices. Data Intelligence 2(1–2): 171–180.

10.

Boeckhout

Zielhuis

Bredenoord

(2018) The FAIR Guiding Principles for data stewardship: Fair enough? European Journal of Human Genetics 26(7): 931–936.

11.

Calamai

Frontini

(2018) FAIR data principles and their application to speech and oral archives. Journal of New Music Research 47(4): 339–354.

12.

Collins

Genova

Harrower

, et al. (2018) Turning FAIR into reality: Final report and action plan from the European Commission expert group on FAIR data. Available at: https://www.vdu.lt/cris/handle/20.500.12259/103794

13.

Columbia University Irving Medical Center (2022) What are the FAIR data principles? Available at: https://library.cumc.columbia.edu/insight/what-are-fair-data-principles (accessed 23 April 2022).

14.

Cook

Mulrow

Haynes

(1997) Systematic reviews: Synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Annals of Internal Medicine 126(5): 376–380.

15.

Crosswell

Thornton

(2012) ELIXIR: A distributed infrastructure for European biological data. Trends in Biotechnology 30(5): 241–242.

16.

Degbelo

(2022) FAIR geovisualizations: Definitions, challenges, and the road ahead. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 36(6): 1059–1099.

17.

De la Hidalga

Goodall

Anyika

, et al. (2022) Designing a data infrastructure for catalysis science aligned to FAIR data principles. Catalysis Communications 162: Article 106384.

18.

Devaraju

Huber

(2021) An automated solution for measuring the progress toward FAIR research data. Patterns 2(11): Article 100370.

19.

Dumontier

Wesley

(2018) Advancing discovery science with FAIR data stewardship: Findable, accessible, interoperable, reusable. Serials Librarian 74(1–4): 39–48.

20.

ELIXIR (n.d.) WP3: Standardising processes for FAIR data management. Available at: https://elixir-europe.org/internal-projects/commissioned-services/2024-interoperability#wp3

21.

European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (2016) Open Innovation, Open Science, Open to the World: A Vision for Europe. Brussels: European Commission Publications Office.

22.

FAIR Data Point (n.d.) What is a FAIR data point. Available at: https://www.fairdatapoint.org/

23.

FAIRsFAIR (n.d.) FAIRsFAIR data object assessment metrics: Request for comments. Available at: https://www.fairsfair.eu/fairsfair-data-object-assessment-metrics-request-comments (accessed 15 October 2022).

24.

Garijo

Corcho

Poveda-Villalón

(2021) FOOPS! An ontology pitfall scanner for the FAIR principles. Available at: https://foops.linkeddata.es/assets/iswc_2021_demo.pdf

25.

Garnett

Leahey

Savard

, et al. (2017) Open metadata for research data discovery in Canada. Journal of Library Metadata 17(3–4): 201–217.

26.

GO-FAIR (n.d.) FAIR principles. Available at: https://www.go-fair.org/fair-principles/ (accessed 23 September 2022).

27.

Goble

Cohen-Boulakia

Soiland-Reyes

, et al. (2020) FAIR computational workflows. Data Intelligence 2(1–2): 108–121.

28.

Groth

Cousijn

Clark

, et al. (2020) FAIR data reuse: The path through data citation. Data Intelligence 2(1–2): 78–86.

29.

Guerrini

(2022) Metadata: The dimension of cataloging in the digital age. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 60(5): 411–423.

30.

Hauschke

Nazarovets

Altemeier

, et al. (2021) Roadmap to FAIR research information in open infrastructures. Journal of Library Metadata 21(1–2): 45–61.

31.

INEXDA Working Group on Data Access (2020) Final report of the INEXDA Working Group on Data Access. Available at: https://www.inexda.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/FINAL_INEXDA_WG_DA_Final_Report.pdf

32.

Jacobsen

De Miranda Azevedo

Juty

, et al. (2020a) FAIR principles: Interpretations and implementation considerations. Data Intelligence 2(1–2): 10–29.

33.

Jacobsen

Kaliyaperumal

Da Silva Santos

LOB

, et al. (2020b) A generic workflow for the data FAIRification process. Data Intelligence 2(1–2): 56–65.

34.

Jagodnik

Koplev

Jenkins

, et al. (2017) Developing a framework for digital objects in the Big Data to Knowledge (BD2 K) commons: Report from the Commons Framework Pilots workshop. Journal of Biomedical Informatics 71: 49–57.

35.

Jones

Pergl

Hooft

, et al. (2020) Data management planning: How requirements and solutions are beginning to converge. Data Intelligence 2(1–2): 208–219.

36.

Koster

Woutersen-Windhouwer

(2018) FAIR principles for library, archive and museum collections: A proposal for standards for reusable collections. Code4Lib Journal 40: 1–12.

37.

Kraft

(2017) The FAIR data principles for research data. In: TIB blog. Available at: https://blogs.tib.eu/wp/tib/2017/09/12/the-fair-data-principles-for-research-data/

38.

Labastida

Margoni

(2020) Licensing FAIR data for reuse. Data Intelligence 2(1–2): 199–207.

39.

Lamprecht

Garcia

Kuzak

, et al. (2020) Towards FAIR principles for research software. Data Science 3(1): 37–59.

40.

Landi

Thompson

Giannuzzi

, et al. (2020) The ‘A’ of FAIR – as open as possible, as closed as necessary. Data Intelligence 2(1–2): 47–55.

41.

Linden

Procházka

Lappalainen

, et al. (2018) Common ELIXIR service for researcher authentication and authorisation. F1000Research 7: Article 1199.

42.

Masinde

Sanya

(2022) Analysis of interoperability, security and usability of digital repositories in Kenyan institutions of higher learning. Data and Information Management 6(4): Article 100011.

43.

McKibbon

(2006) Systematic reviews and librarians. Library Trends 55(1): 202–215.

44.

McQuilton

Batista

Beyan

, et al. (2020) Helping the consumers and producers of standards, repositories and policies to enable FAIR data. Data Intelligence 2(1–2): 151–157.

45.

Moher

Liberati

Tetzlaff

, et al. (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. Annals of Internal Medicine 151(4): 264–269.

46.

Mokrane

Recker

(2019) CoreTrustSealCertified repositories: Enabling findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable (FAIR) data. In: iPRES 2019: 16th international conference on digital preservation, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 16–20 September 2019.

47.

Mons

(2018) Data Stewardship for Open Science: Implementing FAIR Principles. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

48.

Mons

Neylon

Velterop

, et al. (2017) Cloudy, increasingly FAIR; revisiting the FAIR data guiding principles for the European open science cloud. Information Services and Use 37(1): 49–56.

49.

National Institutes of Health (2015) NIH strategic plan for data science. Available at: https://datascience.nih.gov/sites/default/files/NIH_Strategic_Plan_for_Data_Science_Final_508.pdf (accessed 23 December 2023).

50.

OpenAIRE (n.d.) How to make your Data FAIR. Available at: https://www.openaire.eu/how-to-make-your-data-fair

51.

Roche

Kruuk

Lanfear

, et al. (2015) Public data archiving in ecology and evolution: How well are we doing? PLoS Biology 13(11): Article e1002295.

52.

Sansone

McQuilton

Rocca-Serra

, et al. (2019) FAIRsharing as a community approach to standards, repositories and policies. Nature Biotechnology 37(4): 358–367.

53.

Scheffler

Aeschlimann

Albrecht

, et al. (2022) FAIR data enabling new horizons for materials research. Nature 604(7907): 635–642.

54.

Schultes

Strawn

Mons

(2018) Ready, set, GO FAIR: Accelerating convergence to an internet of FAIR data and services. DAMDID/RCDL 19: 23.

55.

Sinaci

Núñez-Benjumea

Gencturk

, et al. (2020) From raw data to FAIR data: The FAIRification workflow for health research. Methods of Information in Medicine 59(S01): e21–e32.

56.

Starr

Castro

Crosas

, et al. (2015) Achieving human and machine accessibility of cited data in scholarly publications. PeerJ Computer Science 1: Article e1.

57.

Sykes

(2008) Managing the UK’s research data: Towards a UK research data service. New Review of Information Networking 14(1): 21–36.

58.

Thompson

Burger

Kaliyaperumal

, et al. (2020) Making FAIR easy with FAIR tools: From creolization to convergence. Data Intelligence 2(1–2): 87–95.

59.

Tomoyose

Arakaki

ACS

(2021) Vocabularies for publishing research data. Cataloging and Classification Quarterly 60(1): 69–85.

60.

University of Edinburgh (n.d.) Research data support: Quick Guide 6. Available at: https://www.ed.ac.uk/sites/default/files/atoms/files/quick_guide_6_-_making_your_research_data_fair_v1.1_0.pdf

61.

Utrecht University (n.d.) Research data Management Support. Available at: https://www.uu.nl/en/research/research-data-management/guides/how-to-make-your-data-fair

62.

Velterop

Schultes

(2020) An academic publishers’ GO FAIR implementation network (APIN). Information Services and Use 40(4): 333–341.

63.

Wilkinson

Dumontier

Aalbersberg

, et al. (2016) The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3: Article 160018.

64.

Wilkinson MD, Sansone SA, Schultes E, et al. (2018) A design framework and exemplar metrics for FAIRness. Scientific Data 5(1): 1–4.

65.

Wise

De Barron

Splendiani

, et al. (2019) Implementation and relevance of FAIR data principles in biopharmaceutical R&D. Drug Discovery Today 24(4): 933–938.