This study measured the individual differences in the service quality of Bangladeshi university libraries by type of university, user and gender. A modified SERVQUAL (service quality) model was adopted for the academic library environment, which included 30 items under five dimensions with a 7-point Likert scale. The survey was conducted among 61 teachers, 50 researchers and 455 students from two public, two international and two private universities in Bangladesh. The individual differences in library service quality were calculated through an analysis of variance and independent sample t-test for the university, user and gender categories. The overall service quality was significantly different (p < .001) among the users of the public (M = 4.02), private (M = 5.08) and international (M = 5.10) university libraries, as well as between male (M = 4.48) and female (M = 5.01) users. Several statistical methods supported the sampling adequacy, reliability and validity of the adapted model, which could be used as a basis for further assessments of library service quality by different demographic groups, both locally and globally.
AhmedS (2017) Service quality satisfaction: A comparative cross-sectional study of public and private university librarians in Pakistan. Libri67(4): 313–325.
2.
AhmedSMZShoebZH (2009) Measuring service quality of a public university library in Bangladesh using SERVQUAL. Performance Measurement and Metrics10(1): 17–32.
3.
AlamMJ (2017) Service quality assessment of a private university library in Bangladesh using SERVQUAL. Research paper, Eastern University, Bangladesh.
4.
AlamMJ (2018) Assessing adoption and satisfaction of open source integrated library systems in the university libraries of Bangladesh. Master’s Dissertation, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Bangladesh.
5.
AlamMJ (2020) Service quality assessment of Eastern University Library using SERVQUAL. In: AlamMAAlamFBegumD (eds) Knowledge Management, Governance and Sustainable Development: Lessons and Insights from Developing Countries. New York: Routledge, 105–121.
6.
AlamMJ (2021) Effects of service quality on satisfaction in Eastern University Library, Bangladesh. IFLA Journal47(2): 209–222.
7.
AlamMJ (2022) Service quality and its impact on user satisfaction in university libraries of Bangladesh. PhD Thesis, Bangladesh University of Professionals, Bangladesh.
8.
AlamMJMezbah-ul-IslamM (2019) Factors for adoption of OSILS in university libraries of Bangladesh. IFLA Journal45(2): 127–139.
9.
AlamMJMezbah-ul-IslamM (2021) Service quality assessment model for academic libraries. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication70(4–5): 325–338.
10.
AlamMJMezbah-ul-IslamM (2023) Impact of service quality on user satisfaction in public university libraries of Bangladesh using structural equation modeling. Performance Measurement and Metrics24(1): 12–30.
11.
AndaleebSSSimmondsPL (1998) Explaining user satisfaction with academic libraries: Strategic implications. College and Research Libraries59(2): 156–167.
12.
ComreyALLeeHB (1992) A First Course in Factor Analysis. 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
FornellCLarckerDF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research18(1): 39–50.
14.
GronroosC (1982) Strategic management and marketing in the service sector. Research report 8, Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, Sweden.
HoqueUSAkhterNAbsarN, et al. (2023) Assessing service quality using SERVQUAL model: An empirical study on some private universities in Bangladesh. Trends in Higher Education2(1): 255–269.
17.
HossainMJ (2016) Determining the key dimensions for evaluating service quality and satisfaction in academic libraries. International Information and Library Review48(3): 176–189.
18.
HossainMJAhmedSMZ (2013) Developing a service performance assessment system to improve service quality of academic libraries. Business Information Review30(4): 210–221.
19.
HossainMJAhmedSMZ (2014) An investigation of service expectations: Developing and validating an alternative scale for service quality assessment in academic libraries. International Information and Library Review46(1–2): 21–30.
20.
HossainMJIslamA (2012) Understanding perceived service quality and satisfaction: A study of Dhaka University Library, Bangladesh. Performance Measurement and Metrics13(3): 169–182.
21.
KaiserHF (1974) An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika39(1): 31–36.
22.
KarimS (2018) Library performance measurement: A study of Dhaka University residential hall libraries, Bangladesh. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article 1831. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1831
23.
LeechNLBarrettKCMorganGA (2005) SPSS for Intermediate Statistics: Use and Interpretation. 2nd ed. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
Mezbah-ul-IslamM (2003) Measuring effectiveness of university libraries: Case study of Bangladesh. PhD Thesis, North-Eastern Hill University, India.
25.
MoreiraBLGonçalvesMALaenderAHF, et al. (2009) Automatic evaluation of digital libraries with LibQUAL. Journal of Informetrics3(2): 102–123.
26.
NadiriM (1970) Diagnosing university students zone of tolerance from university library services. Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science15(1): 1–21.
27.
NawarathneIM (2015) The perception and satisfaction of the academic staff members towards quality of the library services: Perspectives from academic libraries in Sri Lanka. PEARL9(4): 262–272.
28.
NunnallyJC (1978) Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
29.
ParasuramanAZeithamlVABerryLL (1985) A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing49(4): 41–50.
30.
ParasuramanAZeithamlVABerryLL (1988) SERVQUAL: A multiple-item scale for measuring consumer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing64(1): 12–40.
31.
PartapB (2019) A review of service quality assessment of library and information centres. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article 2333. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/2333
32.
RehmanSU (2012) Measuring service quality in public and private sector university libraries of Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Library and Information Science13: 1–11.
33.
RoscoeJT (1975) Fundamental Research Statistics for the Behavioural Sciences. 2nd ed. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
34.
RoyMCBouchardL (1999) Developing and evaluating methods for user satisfaction measurement in practice. Journal of Information Technology Management10(3–4): 49–58.
35.
SchierholzRLaukkanenT (2007) Internet vs mobile banking: Comparing customer value perceptions. Business Process Management Journal13(6): 788–797.
36.
SekaranU (2003) Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach. 4th ed. New York: Wiley.
37.
SharmaSKAnandVKSharmaG (2010) Quality of services rendered by university libraries: An empirical investigation. Trends in Information Management6(1): 1–16.
38.
ShoebZH (2010) Perceptions of library services by gender: A study in Bangladesh. Libri60(4): 331–338.
39.
ShoebZH (2011) Identifying service superiority, zone of tolerance and underlying dimensions: Service quality attributes in a private university library in Bangladesh. Library Review60(4): 293–311.
40.
ShoebZHAhmedSMZ (2009) Individual differences in service quality assessment: A study of a private university library system in Bangladesh. Performance Measurement and Metrics10(3): 193–211.
