Exploring academic staff engagement in depositing locally produced research content in open access institutional repositories in Tanzania

Abstract

This study explored academic staff engagement in depositing locally produced content in open access institutional repositories in public universities in Tanzania. The general objective of this study was to establish the extent to which academic staff are engaged in depositing locally produced content in open access institutional repositories. The study employed a cross-sectional research design. Data was collected using a structured questionnaire, which was administered to 292 academic staff selected through systematic random sampling. Purposive sampling was used to select 14 key informants. The results reveal that 92.5% of the respondents were aware of the presence of open access institutional repositories and 46.2% of the respondents had self-archived their academic work in open access institutional repositories. Poor Internet connectivity, low bandwidth, and a time-consuming and unstable power supply were the challenges encountered by the academic staff in the process of uploading their work. Several recommendations are suggested to expedite the process.

Keywords

Depositing locally produced content open access institutional repository self-archiving research output Tanzania

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abdelrahman

(2017) Use of the University of Khartoum institutional repository by graduate students. Journal of Library and Information Technology 37(2): 104–108.

Abuabdallah

(2014) The Gap between Scholarly Practices and the Institutional Practices at Dalhousie University. Master of Applied Computer Science, Dalhousie University Halifax, Nova Scotia.

Aghwotu

Ebiere

(2016) Awareness and attitude of lecturers toward establishing institutional repository in Niger Delta University, Bayelsa State, Nigeria. Information and Knowledge Management 6(6).

Alemayehu

(2010) Researchers’ attitude to using institutional repositories: A case study of the Oslo University institutional repository (DUO). Master’s Thesis, Oslo University College, Norway.

Bamigbola

Adetimirin

(2017) Evaluating the use of institutional repositories by lecturers in Nigerian universities. Journal of Information and Knowledge Management 8(3): 83–102.

Bangani

(2018) The history, deployment, and future of institutional repositories in public universities in South Africa. Journal of Academic Librarianship 44(1): 39–51.

Chilimo

(2016) Institutional repositories: Awareness and self-archiving practices of academic researchers in selected public universities in Kenya. In: 4th CODESRIA conference on electronic publishing, Dakar, Senegal, 30 March–1 April 2016.

Dhanavandan

Tamizhchelvan

(2013) A critical study on attitudes and awareness of institutional repositories and open access publishing. Journal of Information Science Theory and Practice 1(4): 67–75.

Dulle

(2010) An analysis of open access scholarly communication in Tanzania public universities. PhD Thesis, University of South Africa, South Africa.

10.

Dulle

Minishi-Majanja

(2011) The suitability of the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT) model in open access adoption studies. Information Development 27(1): 32–45.

11.

Dutta

Paul

(2014) Awareness on institutional repositories – related issues by faculty of University of Calcutta. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology 34(4): 293–297.

12.

Eger

Scheufen

Meierrieks

(2015) The determinants of open access publishing: Survey evidence from Germany. European Journal of Law and Economics 39(3): 475–503.

13.

Eromosele

(2019) Building an institutional repository: The case of University of Ilorin, Library, Nigeria. Library Hi Tech News 36(8): 1–6.

14.

Ezema

(2011) Building open access institutional repositories for global visibility of Nigerian scholarly publication. Library Review 60(6): 473–485.

15.

Ezema

Okafor

(2015) Open access institutional repositories in Nigeria academic libraries: Advocacy and issues in scholarly communication. Library Collections, Acquisitions and Technical Services 39(3-4): 45–58.

16.

Goswami

Dutta

(2016) Gender differences in technology usage: A literature review. Open Journal of Business and Management 4(1): 51–59.

17.

Halder

Chandra

(2012) Users’ attitudes towards institutional repository at Jadavpur University: A critical study. International Journal of Management and Sustainability 1(2): 45–52.

18.

Ivwighreghweta

(2012) An investigation to the challenges of institutional repositories development in six academic institutions in Nigeria. International Journal of Digital Library Services 2(4): 1–17.

19.

Jain

(2013) Promoting open access to research in academic libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article 737. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/737

20.

Kim

(2011) Motivations of faculty self-archiving in institutional repositories. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 37(3): 246–254.

21.

Lippincott

(2006) Institutional strategies and policies for electronic theses and dissertations. EDUCAUSE Centre for Applied Research: Research Bulletin 13. Available at: https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2006/6/erb0613-pdf.pdf

22.

Lwoga

Questier

(2014) Faculty adoption and usage behavior of open access scholarly in health sciences universities. New Library World 115(3–4): 116–139.

23.

Mardis

Hoffman

Marshall

(2008) A new framework for understanding educational digital library use: Re-examining digital divides in US schools. International Journal on Digital Libraries 9(1): 19–27.

24.

Marshall

(2007) A new model for explaining technology usage: The Quadratic Usage Model. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/296112510_A_New_Model_for_Explaining_Technology_Usage_The_Quadratic_Usage_Model (accessed 19 November 2020).

25.

Mnzava

Chirwa

(2018) Usage of Sokoine University of Agriculture institutional repository among academic staff at the College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical Science in Tanzania. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication 67(8–9): 510–522.

26.

Mtega

Dulle

Malekani

, et al. (2014) The usage of e-resources among agricultural researchers and extension staff in Tanzania. Library and Information Research 38(119): 47–66.

27.

Muneja

(2010) A reflection of Tanzania libraries in the digital age: Challenges and prospects. In: Annual conference of the Tanzania Library Association, Mbeya, Tanzania, February 2010.

28.

Nunda

Elia

(2019) Institutional repositories adoption and use in selected Tanzanian higher learning institutions. International Journal of Education and Development Using ICT 15(1): 150–164.

29.

Nwokedi

(2018) Open access institutional repositories in academic and research institutions in Nigeria: A review of benefits and challenges. International Journal of Academic Library and Information Science 6(8): 242–252.

30.

Nyambi

Maynard

(2012) An investigation of institutional repositories in state universities in Zimbabwe. Information Development 28(1): 55–67.

31.

Oguz

Assefa

(2014) Faculty members’ perceptions towards institutional repository at a medium-sized university: Application of a binary logistic regression model. Library Review 63(3): 189–202.

32.

Okoye

Ejikeme

(2011) Open access, institutional repositories, and scholarly publishing: The role of librarians in southeast Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal): Article 612. Available at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/612

33.

Omeluzor

(2014) An institutional repository (IR) awareness and willingness of faculty staff to deposit research work: A study of faculty staff in selected public and private universities in Nigeria. Open Access Library Journal 1(9): 1–11.

34.

OpenDOAR (2020) Directory of Open Access Repositories. Available at: https://v2.sherpa.ac.uk/opendoar/ (accessed 24 September 2021).

35.

Rehman

Hashmi

Jabbar

(2019) Awareness and availability of institutional repository: Perceptions of Pakistani research scholars. Research Journal of South Asian Studies 34(2): 547–562.

36.

Saini

(2018) The emergence of institutional repositories: A conceptual understanding key issues through review of literature. Library Philosophy and Practice 3(3): 1–19.

37.

Samzugi

(2017) The role of institutional repositories in promoting grey literature in academic libraries in Tanzania. University of Dar es Salaam Library Journal 12(2).

38.

Saulus

Mutula

Dlamin

(2017) Technology acceptance factors in the use of institutional repositories: The case of the University of Swaziland (UNISWA)’s Faculty of Agriculture and Consumer Sciences. Available at: https://www.scecsal.org/publications/papers2018/038_saulus_2018.pdf (accessed 24 September 2018).

39.

Sedgwick

(2014) Cross-sectional studies: Advantages and disadvantages. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g2276.

40.

Siegel

(2010) Institutional grey literature in the university environment. In: Farace

Schopfel

(eds) Grey Literature in Library and Information Studies. Munich: De Gruyter Saur. Available at: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-0198129.

41.

Singson

Sevukan

Murugaiyan

(2015) Author self-archiving and licensing policies of open access library and information science journals: A study. Annals of Library and Information Studies (ALIS) 62(2): 104–109.

42.

Taherdoost

(2016) Validity and reliability of the research instrument: How to test the validation of a questionnaire/survey in a research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management 5(3): 28–36.

43.

Yang

(2015) University Faculty Awareness and Attitudes towards Open Access Publishing and the Institutional Repository: A Case Study. Journal of Librarianship and Scholarly Communication 3(1): 5.