In this article, the authors report on an ongoing data life cycle management national project realized in Switzerland, with a major focus on long-term preservation. Based on an extensive document analysis as well as semi-structured interviews, the project aims at providing national services to respond to the most relevant researchers’ data life cycle management needs, which include: guidelines for establishing a data management plan, active data management solutions, long-term preservation storage options, training, and a single point of access and contact to get support. In addition to presenting the different working axes of the project, the authors describe a strategic management and lean startup template for developing new business models, which is key for building viable services.
AbramsSCrusePKunzeJ. (2012) Total Cost of Preservation (TCP): Cost Modeling for Sustainable Services. UC Curation Center, California Digital Library.
2.
BairavasundaramLNGoodsonGRSchroederB. (2008) An analysis of data corruption in the storage stack. In: FAST’08: 6th USENIX conference on file and storage technologies, Boston, MA, USA, 22–27 June 2008, pp. 223–238.
3.
BallA (2010) Review of the State of the Art of the Digital Curation of Research Data (version 1.2). Bath, UK: University of Bath.
4.
BeagrieNChruszczJLavoieB (2008) Keeping Research Safe. A Cost Model and Guidance for UK Universities. Final Report. Salisbury: Charles Beagrie Limited.
5.
BeagrieNLavoieBWoollardM (2010) Keeping Research Safe 2. Final Report. Salisbury: Charles Beagrie Limited.
6.
BihouixP (2014) L’Âge des low-tech. Paris: Seuil.
7.
BorgmanCL (2015) Big Data, Little Data, No Data. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
8.
CEOS (2011) Data Life Cycle Models and Concepts. Working Group on Information Systems and Services Data Stewardship Interest Group. 26 September 2011. CEOS.WGISS.DSIG.TN01.
Digital POWRR (2014) Preserving Digital Objects with Restricted Resources. Available at: http://digitalpowrr.niu.edu/ (accessed 10 October 2016).
12.
GoodmanAPepeABlockerAW. (2014) Ten simple rules for the care and feeding of scientific data. PLoS Comput Biol10(4). DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003542.
13.
KimJWargaEMoenWE (2013) Competencies required for digital curation: An analysis of job advertisements. International Journal of Digital Curation8(1): 66–83.
14.
KlindtMAmrheinK (2015) One core preservation system for all your data. No exception! In: 12th International conference on preservation of digital objects, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 2–6 November 2015, pp. 101–108.
LeeCA (2011) A framework for contextual information in digital collections. Journal of Documentation67(1): 95–143.
17.
ManiatisPRoussopoulosMGiuliTJ. (2005) The LOCKSS peer-to-peer digital preservation system. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems23(1): 2–50.
18.
NSB (2005) Long-Lived Digital Data Collections Enabling Research and Education in the 21st Century. Report no. NSB-05-40. National Science Foundation. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2005/nsb0540/nsb0540.pdf (accessed 10 October 2016).
PouchardL (2015) Revisiting the data lifecycle with big data curation. International Journal of Digital Curation10(2): 176–192.
24.
RosenthalDSH (2010) Bit preservation: A solved problem?International Journal of Digital Curation5(1): 134–148.
25.
SchumacherJ. (2014) From Theory to Action: ‘Good Enough’ Digital Preservation Solutions for Under-Resourced Cultural Heritage Institutions. A Digital POWRR White Paper for the Institute of Museum and Library Services. DOI: http://hdl.handle.net/10843/13610.
26.
TenopirCDaltonEDAllardS. (2015) Changes in data sharing and data reuse practices and perceptions among scientists worldwide. PloS ONE10(8): e0134826. DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0134826.
27.
WallisJCRolandoEBorgmanCL (2013) If we share data, will anyone use them? Data sharing and reuse in the long tail of science and technology. PLoS ONE8(7) DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0067332.
28.
WallisJC (2014) Data producers courting data reusers: Two cases from modeling communities. International Journal of Digital Curation9(1): 98–109.
