How library and information science (LIS) academic administrators perceive e-learning (EL) in LIS schools is examined, particularly what LIS academic administrators see as the merits and demerits of using EL, what types of constraints they face in using EL to provide LIS education, and how they overcome the constraints of EL systems in LIS schools. An exploratory online email interview was conducted, using a link to a questionnaire, with 85 LIS academic administrators around the world in order to gather perceptions and experiences regarding EL usage in LIS schools. The respondents reported some major merits, demerits, and some constraints, which they face in using EL systems in their schools. They also proposed the design of a long-range plan for EL growth, the implementation of interactive and online office hours, and the establishment of consortia across universities to overcome constraints on EL usage in LIS education. The respondents had neither highly-positive nor highly-negative opinions about EL usage in LIS schools.
AldhafeeriFAlmullaMAlraqasB (2006) Teachers’ expectations of the impact of e-learning on Kuwait’s public education system, Social Behavior and Personality34(6): 711–728.
2.
AndrewsRHaythornthwaiteC (Eds.) (2007) Handbook of e-learning research. London: Sage.
3.
AssarehABidokhtMH (2011) Barriers to e-teaching and e-learning. Procedia Computer Science3: 791–795. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2010.12.129
4.
BarronD (2002) Distance education in library and information science: A long road traveled. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science43(1): 3–5.
5.
BhabalJ (2008) E-learning in LIS education: Case study of SHPT School of library science. In6th International Conference CALIBER-2008:631–638). University of Allahabad, Allahabad, February 28–19 and March 1, 2008. Retrieved September, 22, 2011, from. http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/dxml/bitstream/handle/1944/1312/67.pdf?sequence=1
6.
BleimannU (2004) Atlantis University: A new pedagogical approach beyond e-learning. Campus-wide Information Systems21(5): 191–195.
7.
CareyJOGregoryVL (2002) Students’ perceptions of academic motivation, interactive participation, and selected pedagogical and structural factors in web-based learning. Journal of Education for Library and Information Science43(1): 6–15.
CloeteE (2001) Electronic education system model. Computer and Education23: 171–182.
10.
Guri-RosenblitS (2005) Distance education and e-learning: not the same thing. Higher Education49: 467–493.
11.
HamadaM (2007) Web-based active e-learning tools for automata theory. Paper published in the Proceedings of Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, Niigata, Japan, July 18–20, 2007. Doi: 10.1109/ICALT.2007.283
HaythornthwaiteCKazmerMMRobinsJShoemakerS (2000) Community development among distance learners: Temporal and technological dimensions. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication6(10). Retrieved fromhttp://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue1/haythornthwaite.html
14.
HaythornthwaiteCKazmerMM (2001) Bridging the Internet home: Adult distance learners and their Internet, home and work worlds, In BWellmanCHaythornthwaite (Eds.) The Internet in everyday life (pp. 431–463). Oxford: Blackwells.
15.
HodgsonVE (2002) The European Union and e-learning: An examination of rhetoric, theory and practice. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning18: 240–252.
16.
IslamMSKunifujiSHayamaTMiuraM (2011a) Towards exploring a global scenario of e-learning in library and information science schools, The International Information and Library Review43(1): 15–22. doi:10.1016/j.iilr.2011.01.004.
17.
IslamMSKunifujiSHayamaTMiuraM (2011b) E-learning in LIS Education: An analysis and prediction. Library Review60: 544–559.
18.
KazmerMM (2005) How technology affects students’ departures from online learning communities. ACM SIGGROUP Bulletin25(1): 25–30. doi:10.1145/1067699.1067704
LiawS-SHuangH-MChenG-D (2007) Surveying instructor and learner attitude toward e-learning. Computer and Education49: 1066–1080.
25.
ManjunathBPatilS (2006) E-learning and its impact on library and information services. Paper presented at the DRTC conference on ICT for digital learning environment. DRTC, Bangalore on 11–13 January, Paper: H: 1–12.
26.
MccombsBJVarkiliD (2005) A learner-centered framework for e-learning. Teacher College Record107: 1582–1600.
27.
McGillTHobbsV (2008) How students and instructors using a virtual learning environment perceive the fit between technology and task. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning24: 191–202.
28.
McPhersonMA (2005) Developing innovation in e-learning: lessons to be learned. British Journal of Educational Technology36: 585–586.
29.
MehoLI (2006) Email interviewing in qualitative research: A methodological discussion. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology57: 1284–1295.
30.
NishinoKToyaHMizunoSAokiKFukumuraY (2009) The relationship between the learning styles of the students and their e-learning course adaptability. InProceedings of 13th International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems, (pp.539–546). Santiago, Chile, September 28–30, 2009, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
31.
PaechterMMaierB (2010) Online or face-to-face? Students’ experiences and preferences in e-learning. Internet and Higher Education13: 292–297.
32.
RosenbergMJ (2001) E-learning strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age (pp.19–38). New York: McGraw-Hill.
33.
RuizJGMintzerMJLeipzigRM (2006) The impact of e-learning in medical education. Academic Medicine81(3): 207–212.
34.
SacchanandC (2008) Putting the learners into e-learning: An experience of Sukhothai Thammathirat Open University (STOU), Thailand. Paper presented in World Library and Information Congress: 74th IFLA General Conference and Council, Quebec, Canada, August 10–14, 2008. Retrieved fromhttp://archive.ifla.org/IV/ifla74/papers/163–Sacchanand-en.pdf
35.
SchroederAMinochaSSchneidertC (2010) The strength, weakness, opportunities and threats of using social software in higher and further education teaching and learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning26:159–174.
36.
SongY (2005) On e-learning and continuing education for LIS staff. Life long education and libraries: International Scholarly Journals with International Editorial Board. Kyoto University, (5): 37–45.
37.
WangMVogelDRanW (2011) Creating a performance-oriented e-learning environment: A design science approach. Information and Management48(7): 260–269. Doi:10.1016/j.im.2011.06.003
38.
WangTH (2007) What strategies are effective for formative assessment in an e-learning environment?Journal of Computer Assisted Learning23: 171–186.
39.
WelshETWanbergCRBrownKGSimmeringMJ (2003) E-learning: Emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development7(4): 245–258.
40.
WildeMLEppersonA (2006) A survey of alumni of LIS distance education programs: Experiences and implications. The Journal of Academic Librarianship32(3): 238–250.
41.
ZhangDNunamakerJ.F (2003) Powering e-learning in the new millennium: An overview of e-learning and enabling technology. Information Systems Frontiers5(2): 207–218.
42.
ZhangLWenHLiDFuZCuiS (2010) E-learning adoption intention and its key influence factors based on innovation adoption theory. Mathematical and Computer Modeling51: 1428–1432.
43.
ZimnasAKleftourisDValkanosN (2009) IDEAL-A simple instructional design tool for e-learning. Paper published in the Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, vol. 37: 366–372.
