Agency theory argues that shareholder interests require protection by separation of incumbency of rôles of board chair and CEO. Stewardship theory argues shareholder interests are maximised by shared incumbency of these rôles. Results of an empirical test fail to support agency theory and provide some support for stewardship theory.
Barney, J.B., 1990, The debate between traditional management theory and organizational economics: substantive differences or intergroup conflict? Academy of Management Review, 15, 382–393.
2.
Berg, S.V. and S.K. Smith, 1978, CEO and Board Chairman: A Quantitative Study of Dual v. Unitary Board Leadership, Directors and Boards, 3, 34–49.
3.
Berle, A. and G. Means, 1932, The Modern Corporation and Private Property (New York, Macmillan).
4.
Blau, P.M., 1964, Exchange and Power in Social Life (New York, John Wiley).
5.
Chitayat, G., 1985, Working relationships between the Chairman of the Boards of Directors and the CEO, Management International Review, 25, 65–70.
6.
Cyert, R.M., and J.G. March, 1963, A Behavioral Theory of the Firm (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., Prentice-Hall).
7.
Dalton, D.R., and I.F. Kesner, 1987, Composition and CEO duality in boards of directors: an international perspective, Journal of International Business, 18, 3, 33–42.
8.
Donaldson, L., 1985, In Defence of Organization Theory, A Reply to the Critics (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
9.
Donaldson, L., 1990a, The ethereal hand: organizational economics and management theory, Academy of Management Review, 15, 369–381.
10.
Donaldson, L., 1990b, A rational basis for criticisms of organizational economics: a reply to Barney, Academy of Management Review, 15, 394–401.
11.
Eisenhardt, K.M., 1989, Agency theory: an assessment and review, Academy of Management Review, 14, 1, 57–74.
12.
Etzioni, A., 1975, A Comparative Analysis of Complex Organizations (New York: The Free Press) Revised and Enlarged Edition.
13.
Fama, E.F. and M.C. Jensen, 1983, Separation of ownership and control, Journal of Law and Economics, 26, 301–325.
14.
Herzberg, F., B. Mausner, and B. Snyderman, 1959, The Motivation to Work (New York, John Wiley).
15.
Jensen, M.C. and W.H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure, Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
16.
Jensen, M., and W. Meckling, 1979, Rights and production functions: an application to Labor-managed firms, Journal of Business, 52, 469–506.
17.
Kesner, I.F. and D.L. Dalton, 1986, Boards of Directors and the checks and (im)balances of corporate governance, Business Horizons, 29, 5, 17–23.
18.
Korn/Ferry International, 1988, Eighth Annual Survey of Boards of Directors in Australia, Sydney.
19.
Kosnik, R.D., 1987, Greenmail: a study of board perfor Mance in corporate governance, Administrative Science Quarterly, 32, 163–185.
20.
McClelland, D.C., 1961, The Achieving Society (Princeton, N.J., Van Nostrand).
21.
McGregor, D., 1960, The Human Side of Enterprise (New York, McGraw Hill).
22.
Pratt, J.W., and R.J. Zeckhauser, 1985, Principals and agents: the structure of business (Boston, Harvard Business School Press).
23.
Rechner, P.L. and D.R. Dalton, 1988, Board composition and organizational perfor Mance: a longitudinal assessment, Paper presented to the Academy of Management, Anaheim, 1988.
24.
Rechner, P.L. and D.R. Dalton, 1989, The impact of CEO as board chairperson on corporate perfor Mance: evidence vs. rhetoric, The Academy of Management Executive, 3, 2, 141–143.
25.
Rechner, P.L. and D.R. Dalton, 1991, CEO duality and organizational perfor Mance: a longitudinal analysis, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 2, 155–160.
26.
Schoeffler, S., 1983, The PIMS program, in: K. Albert (ed.), The Strategic Management Handbook (New York, McGraw-Hill) pp. 23.1–23.10.
27.
Silverman, D., 1970, The Theory of Organisations (London, Heinemann).
28.
Stigler, G.J. and C. Friedland, 1983, The literature of economics: the case of Berle and Means, Journal of Law and Economics, 36, 237–268.
29.
Sullivan, M.K., 1988, Outsider versus insider boards revisited: a new look at perfor Mance and board composition, Paper presented to the Academy of Management, Anaheim, 1988.
30.
Tricker, R.I., 1984, Corporate Governance: Practice, Procedures and Powers in British Companies and their Boards of Directors (Aldershot, Hants., Gower).
31.
Vance, S.C., 1978, Corporate governance: assessing corporate perfor Mance by boardroom attributes, Journal of Business Research, 6, 203–220.
32.
Williamson, O., 1985, The Economic Institutions of Capitalism (New York, Free Press).
33.
Zahra, S. and J.A. Pearce, II, 1989, Boards of directors and corporate financial perfor Mance: a review and integrative model, Journal of Management, 15, 2, 291–334.
