In contrast with Brownell (1982), this study shows that the interaction between budget participation and budget emphasis has no effect on overall job perfor Mance. Two alternative ways of reconciling the inconsistent results are discussed. Subjects are 44 managers; and the data are collected using a questionnaire survey.
Brownell, P., 1982, The role of accounting data in perfor Mance evaluation, budgetary participation, and organizational effectiveness, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring, 12–27.
2.
Hopwood, A.G., 1972, An empirical study of the role of accounting data in perfor Mance evaluation, Journal of Accounting Research, Supplement, 158–82.
3.
Hunter, J.E., F.L. Schmidt, and G.B Jackson, 1982, Advanced Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods Cumulating Research Findings Across Studies (Beverly Hills, Sage Publications).
4.
Mahoney, T.A., T.H. Jerdee, and S.J. Carroll, 1963, Development of Managerial Perfor Mance: A Research Approach (Cincinnati, South-Western Publishing Company).
5.
Mahoney, T.A., T.H. Jerdee, and S.J. Carroll, 1965, The jobs of management, Industrial Relations, February, 97–110.
6.
Milani, K.W., 1975, The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor perfor Mance and attitudes: a field study, The Accounting Review, April, 274–84.
7.
Otley, D.T., 1978, Budget use and managerial perfor Mance, Journal of Accounting Research, Spring, 122–49.
