Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The Australian Housing Allowance Experiment (HAE) was discontinued in June 1978. The experiment (and any ensuing scheme) seemed destined for trouble because of difficulties unforeseen by its administrators. Some of these problems are alluded to in Albon (1977b) and are here reconsidered. Other potential difficulties are suggested. Specifically, the following issues are considered: can a tied subsidy arrangement be justified?; how does tieing create a possible difference between the dollar value and recipient's valuation of a housing allowance?; what are the implications of moving costs? and what is the likelihood of landlord-tenant coalitions? These are all questions overlooked by the Department of Environment, Housing and Community Development (EHCD).

Keywords

GOODS-SPECIFIC EXTERNALITY HICKS' EQUIVALENT VARIATION LANDLORD-TENANT COALITION LUMP-SUM TRANSFER MOVING COSTS TENANT BENEFITS

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Albon, R. P. , 1977a, “Rent Control, A Costly Redistributive Device?: The Case of Canberra”, Economic Record, forthcoming.

Albon, R.P. , 1977b, “To HAVE and to Hold: Experimentation in Australia with a Housing Allowance Scheme”, Australian Journal of Management, 2, 95–104.

Brennan, H. G. and C. Walsh , 1977, “Pareto-Desirable Redistribution-in-Kind: An Impossibility Theorem”, American Economic Review, 67, 987–90.

Culyer, A.J. , 1971, “Merit Goods and the Welfare Economics of Coercion”, Public Finance/Finances Publique, 26, 546–72.

Daly, G. and J.F. Giertz , 1976, “Transfers and Pareto Optimality”, Journal of Public Economics, 5, 179–82.

De Salvo, J.S. , 1971, “A Methodology for Evaluating Housing Programs”, Journal of Regional Science, 11, 173–85.

Department of Environment, Housing and Community Development (EHCD) , 1976, The Australian Housing Allowance Voucher Experiment (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra).

Department of Environment, Housing and Community Development (EHCD) , 1977, Draft HAVE Information Booklet (Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra).

Murray, M.P. , 1975, “The Distribution of Tenant Benefits in Public Housing”, Econometrica, 43, 771–88.

10.

Musgrave, R.A. , 1959, Tne Theory of Public Finance (New York, McGraw-Hill).

11.

Olsen, E.O. , 1971, “Subsidized Housing in a Competitive Market: Reply”, American Economic Review, 61, 220–24.

12.

Stretton, H. , 1974, Housing and Government (1974 Boyer Lectures, Australian Broadcasting Commission, Canberra).

13.

Tullock, G. , 1971, “Subsidized Housing in a Competitive Market: Comment”, American Economic Review, 61, 218–19.

The Defunct Housing Allowance Experiment: Some Assumptions and Oversights

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References