The two-moment, mean-variance model of asset pricing is tested against data from the Melbourne stock exchange. The model appears to describe the data quite well, though there are problems in experimental design which are yet to be cleared up. Neither variance nor skewness appears to explain additional price behaviour to that explained by covariance, as is predicted by the two-moment model.
Black, F. , 1972, “Capital Market Equilibrium with Restricted Borrowing” , Journal of Business, 45, 444–55.
2.
Black, F. , M.C. Jensen and M. Scholes , 1972, “The Capital Asset Pricing Model: Some Empirical Results”, in: Jensen, M.C. , ed., Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets (Praeger Publishers, New York) 79–121.
3.
Blume, M.E. , 1970, “Portfolio Theory: A Step Toward Its Practical Application” , Journal of Business, 43, 152–73.
4.
Blume, M.E. , and I. Friend , 1973, “A New Look at the Capital Asset Pricing Model” , Journal of Finance, 28, 19–33.
5.
Brown, P., 1974, unpublished, untitled manuscript. University of Western Australia.
6.
Cass, D. , and J.E. Stiglitz , 1970, “The Structure of Investor Preferences and Asset Returns, and Separability in Portfolio Allocation: A Contribution to the Pure Theory of Mutual Funds” , Journal of Economic Theory, 2, 122–60.
7.
Fama, E.F. , and J.D. MacBeth , 1973, “Risk, Return and Equilibrium: Empirical Tests” , Journal of Political Economy, 81, 607–36.
8.
Fama, E.F. , and M.H. Miller , 1972, The Theory of Finance (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York).
9.
Friend, I. , and M. Blume , 1970, “Measurement of Portfolio Performance under Uncertainty” , American Economic Review, 60, 561–75.
10.
Gonedes, N.J. , 1973, “Evidence on the Information Content of Accounting Numbers: Accounting-based and Market-based Estimates of Systematic Risk” , Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 8, 407–44.
11.
Jensen, M.C. , 1972, “The Foundations and Current State of Capital Market Theory” , The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 3, 357–98.
12.
Johnston, J. , 1972, Econometric Methods (McGraw-Hill, New York).
13.
King, B.F. , 1966, “Market and Industry Factors in Stock Price Behaviour” , Journal of Business, 39, Special Supplement, 139–90.
14.
Kraus, A., and R.H. Litzenberger, 1972, “Skewness Preference and the Valuation of Risk Assets”, unpublished manuscript, Stanford University.
15.
Kuhn, T.S. , 1969, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (University of Chicago Press, Chicago).
16.
Lintner, J. , 1965, “The Valuation of Risk Assets and the Selection of Risky Investments in Stock Portfolios and Capital Budgets” , Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 13–37.
Miller, M.H. , and M. Scholes , 1972, “Rates of Return in Relation to Risk: A Re-examination of Some Recent Findings”, in: M.C. Jensen , ed., Studies in the Theory of Capital Markets (Praeger Publishers, New York), 47–78.
20.
Officer, R.R. , 1972, “The Distribution of Stock Returns” , Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 807–12.
21.
Officer, R.R. , 1975, “Seasonality in Australian Capital Markets: Market Efficiency and Empirical Issues” , Journal of Financial Economics, 2, 29–52.
22.
Sharpe, W.F. , 1964, “Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk” , Journal of Finance, 19, 425–42.
23.
Tobin, J.1958, “Liquidity Preference as Behavior Towards Risk” , Review of Economic Studies, 25, 65–86.
