While anecdotally we know that leaders vary in their willingness to help followers depending on the time of a day, this within-person variability is not well-understood in the leadership literature. Based on the Affective Events Theory, we take a temporal dynamic view to address this issue. Specifically, we propose that leaders’ engagement in leadership practices earlier in the workday will lead to positive affect later the same day, increasing their personal helping the next day. We used the experience sampling methodology and collected data from 120 full-time leaders three times a day over two consecutive workweeks to test our hypotheses (n = 839 observations). By identifying three types of daily leadership practices that trigger daily variations in leaders’ positive affect and personal helping, our research challenges the dominated view in the existing research that leaders’ personal helping is not static and it can be varied throughout a workday.
AmabileTPrattM (2016) The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behaviour36: 157–183.
2.
AmabileTMBarsadeSGMuellerJS, et al. (2005) Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly50: 367–403.
3.
AmabileTMSchatzelEAMonetaGB, et al. (2004) Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support. The Leadership Quarterly15: 5–32.
4.
BanksGCGootyJRossRL, et al. (2018) Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly29: 236–251.
5.
BealDJ (2015) ESM 2.0: State of the art and future potential of experience sampling methods in organizational research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior2: 383–407.
6.
BealDJWeissHMBarrosE, et al. (2005) An episodic process model of affective influences on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology90: 1054–1068.
7.
BindlUKParkerSKTotterdellP, et al. (2012) Fuel of the self-starter: How mood relates to proactive goal regulation. Journal of Applied Psychology97: 134–150.
8.
BollenKAHoyleRH (1990) Perceived cohesion: A conceptual and empirical examination. Social Forces69: 479–504.
9.
BonoJEGlombTMShenW, et al. (2013) Building positive resources: Effects of positive events and positive reflection on work stress and health. Academy of Management Journal56: 1601–1627.
10.
BreevaartKBakkerAHetlandJ, et al. (2014) Daily transactional and transformational leadership and daily employee engagement. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology87: 138–157.
11.
BrislinRW (1970) Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology1: 185–216.
12.
BrownTA (2015) Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York: Guilford Press.
13.
BrykASRaudenbushSW (1992) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
14.
CarlsonMCharlinVMillerN (1988) Positive mood and helping behavior: A test of six hypotheses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology55: 211–229.
15.
ChoiJN (2006) Multilevel and cross-level effects of workplace attitudes and group member relations on interpersonal helping behavior. Human Performance19: 383–402.
ConwayJMRogelbergSGPittsVE (2009) Workplace helping: Interactive effects of personality and momentary positive affect. Human Performance22: 321–339.
18.
CooperBEvaNFazlelahiFZ, et al. (2020) Common method variance in vocational behavior research: Reviewing the state of the literature. Journal of Vocational Behavior121: 103472.
19.
DalalRSBhaveDPFisetJ (2014) Within-person variability in job performance: A theoretical review and research agenda. Journal of Management40: 1396–1436.
20.
DeciELOlafsenAHRyanRM (2017) Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior4: 19–43.
21.
DeciELRyanRMGagnéM, et al. (2001) Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin27: 930–942.
22.
EvaNRobinMSendjayaS, et al. (2019) Servant leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. The Leadership Quarterly30: 111–132.
23.
FernandezS (2008) Examining the effects of leadership behavior on employee perceptions of performance and job satisfaction. Public Performance & Management Review32: 175–205.
24.
FernandezSChoYJPerryJL (2010) Exploring the link between integrated leadership and public sector performance. The Leadership Quarterly21: 308–323.
25.
FisherCDToML (2012) Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior33: 865–877.
26.
FredricksonBL (2001) The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist56: 218–226.
27.
FredricksonBL (2004) The broaden–and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B: Biological Sciences359: 1367–1377.
28.
FredricksonBLJoinerT (2018) Reflections on positive emotions and upward spirals. Perspectives on Psychological Science13: 194–199.
29.
GeorgeJMBriefAP (1992) Feeling good-doing good: A conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin112: 310–329.
30.
HairJFBlackWCBabinBJ, et al. (2010) Multivariate Data Analysis. 7th ed.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
31.
HofmannDAGavinMB (1998) Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management24: 623–641.
32.
HunterEMNeubertMJPerrySJ, et al. (2013) Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for employees and the organization. The Leadership Quarterly24: 316–331.
33.
IliesRScottBAJudgeTA (2006) The interactive effects of personal traits and experienced states on intraindividual patterns of citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal49: 561–575.
34.
InceogluIThomasGChuC, et al. (2018) Leadership behavior and employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly29: 179–202.
35.
IsenAM (2008) Some ways in which positive affect influences decision making and problem solving. In: LewisMHaviland-JonesJMBarrettLF (eds) Handbook of Emotions. 3rd ed.New York: Guilford Press, pp. 548–573.
36.
JohnsonREVenusMLanajK, et al. (2012) Leader identity as an antecedent of the frequency and consistency of transformational, consideration, and abusive leadership behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology97: 1262–1272.
KelemenTKMatthewsSHBreevaartK (2020) Leading day-to-day: A review of the daily causes and consequences of leadership behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly31: 101344.
39.
KnightAPEisenkraftN (2015) Positive is usually good, negative is not always bad: The effects of group affect on social integration and task performance. Journal of Applied Psychology100: 1214–1227.
40.
KoopmanJLanajKScottBA (2016) Integrating the bright and dark sides of ocb: A daily investigation of the benefits and costs of helping others. Academy of Management Journal59: 414–435.
41.
LanajKJenningsRE (2020) Putting leaders in a bad mood: The affective costs of helping followers with personal problems. Journal of Applied Psychology105: 355–371.
42.
LanajKFoulkTAErezA (2019) Energizing leaders via self-reflection: A within-person field experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology104: 1–18.
43.
LanajKJohnsonRELeeSM (2016a) Benefits of transformational behaviors for leaders: A daily investigation of leader behaviors and need fulfillment. Journal of Applied Psychology101: 237–251.
44.
LanajKJohnsonREWangM (2016b) When lending a hand depletes the will: The daily costs and benefits of helping. Journal of Applied Psychology101: 1097–1110.
45.
LeeKAllenNJ (2002) Organizational citizenship behavior and workplace deviance: The role of affect and cognitions. Journal of Applied Psychology87: 131–142.
46.
LiaoCLeeHWJohnsonRE, et al. (2021) Serving you depletes me? A leader-centric examination of servant leadership behaviors. Journal of Management47: 1185–1218.
47.
LiaoZLiuWLiX, et al. (2019) Give and take: An episodic perspective on leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology104: 34–51.
48.
LidenRCWayneSJLiaoC, et al. (2014) Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal57: 1434–1452.
49.
LonatiSQuirogaBFZehnderC, et al. (2018) On doing relevant and rigorous experiments: Review and recommendations. Journal of Operations Management64: 19–40.
50.
LyubomirskySKingLDienerE (2005) The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?Psychological Bulletin131: 803–855.
51.
MadisonKEvaN (2019) Social exchange or social learning: A theoretical fork in road for servant leadership researchers. In: SendjayaS (ed.) Leading for High Performance in Asia. Singapore: Springer, pp. 133–158.
52.
MartinJ (2015) Transformational and transactional leadership: An exploration of gender, experience, and institution type. Portal: Libraries and the Academy15: 331–351.
53.
MignonacKHerrbachO (2004) Linking work events, affective states, and attitudes: An empirical study of managers’ emotions. Journal of Business and Psychology19: 221–240.
54.
NezlekJBFeistGJWilsonFC, et al. (2001) Day-to-day variability in empathy as a function of daily events and mood. Journal of Research in Personality35: 401–423.
55.
OhlySSonnentagSNiessenC, et al. (2010) Diary studies in organizational research. Journal of Personnel Psychology9: 79–93.
56.
PatrickHKneeCRCanevelloA, et al. (2007) The role of need fulfillment in relationship functioning and well-being: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology92: 434–457.
57.
PeñalverJSalanovaMMartínezIM, et al. (2019) Happy-productive groups: How positive affect links to performance through social resources. The Journal of Positive Psychology14: 377–392.
58.
PodsakoffNPLepineJALepineMA (2007) Differential challenge stressor-hindrance stressor relationships with job attitudes, turnover intentions, turnover, and withdrawal behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology92: 438–454.
59.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88: 879–903.
60.
RosenCCSimonLSGajendranRS, et al. (2019) Boxed in by your inbox: Implications of daily e-mail demands for managers’ leadership behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology104: 19–33.
61.
SeligJPPreacherKJ (2008) Monte Carlo method for assessing mediation: An interactive tool for creating confidence intervals for indirect effects. Available at: https://www.quantpsy.org/medmc/medmc.htm
62.
SpectorPE (2006) Method variance in organizational research: Truth or urban legend?Organizational Research Methods9: 221–232.
63.
TrougakosJPBealDJChengBH, et al. (2015) Too drained to help: A resource depletion perspective on daily interpersonal citizenship behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology100: 227–236.
64.
TrougakosJPBealDJGreenSG, et al. (2008) Making the break count-an episodic examination of recovery activities, emotional experiences, and positive affective displays. Academy of Management Journal51: 131–146.
65.
TrougakosJPHidegIChengBH, et al. (2014) Lunch breaks unpacked: The role of autonomy as a moderator of recovery during lunch. Academy of Management Journal57: 405–421.
66.
Van den BroeckAFerrisDLChangC-H, et al. (2016) A review of self-determination theory’s basic psychological needs at work. Journal of Management42: 1195–1229.
67.
VolbrechtMMLemery-ChalfantKAksanN, et al. (2007) Examining the familial link between positive affect and empathy development in the second year. The Journal of Genetic Psychology168: 105–130.
68.
WalumbwaFOHartnellCAOkeA (2010) Servant leadership, procedural justice climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: A cross-level investigation. Journal of Applied Psychology95: 517–529.
69.
WatsonDClarkLTellegenA (1988) Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology54: 1063–1070. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
70.
WeggeJDickRVFisherGK, et al. (2006) A test of basic assumptions of affective events theory (AET) in call centre work. British Journal of Management17: 237–254.
71.
WeissHMBealDJ (2005) Reflections on affective events theory. Research on Emotion in Organizations1: 1–21.
72.
WeissHMCropanzanoR (1996) Affective events theory: A theoretical discussion of the structure, causes and consequences of affective experiences at work. In: StawBMCummingsLL (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior: An Annual Series of Analytical Essays and Critical Reviews, Vol. 18. Oxford: Elsevier Science/JAI Press, pp. 1–74.
73.
WheelerLReisHT (1991) Self-recording of everyday life events: Origins, types, and uses. Journal of Personality59: 339–354.
74.
WilliamsSShiawWT (1999) Mood and organizational citizenship behavior: The effects of positive affect on employee organizational citizenship behavior intentions. The Journal of Psychology133: 656–668.
75.
XanthopoulouDBakkerABOerlemansWGM, et al. (2018) Need for recovery after emotional labor: Differential effects of daily deep and surface acting. Journal of Organizational Behavior39: 481–494.
76.
YuklG (2012) Effective leadership behavior: What we know and what questions need more attention. Academy of Management Perspectives26: 66–85.
77.
YuklGGordonATaberT (2002) A hierarchical taxonomy of leadership behavior: Integrating a half century of behavior research. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies9: 15–32.
78.
YuklGMahsudRPrussiaG, et al. (2019) Effectiveness of broad and specific leadership behaviors. Personnel Review48: 774–783.
79.
YuklGO’DonnellMTaberT (2009) Influence of leader behaviors on the leader-member exchange relationship. Journal of Managerial Psychology24: 289–299.
