Adopting a person-centred approach, we integrate the job demands-control-support model with relational work design theory to investigate employee work design profiles involving autonomy, workload, social support and prosocial characteristics (representing the combined influence of task significance and beneficiary contact). For a sample of Australian not-for-profit employees (N = 2421), we identified four work design profiles: ‘active connected’, ‘passive disconnected’, ‘high strain disconnected’ and ‘controlled disconnected’. The most favourable profile, active connected, demonstrated the highest vigour and social worth, and was predicted by people being in higher managerial positions and having permanent employment contracts. The high strain disconnected and controlled disconnected profiles were associated with greater psychological exhaustion. Longer working hours predicted membership of the high strain disconnected profile.
BakkerABDemeroutiE (2007) The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology22: 309–328.
3.
BakkerABDemeroutiE (2008) Towards a model of work engagement. Career Development International13: 209–223.
4.
ButterworthPLeachLSMcManusS, et al. (2013) Common mental disorders, unemployment and psychosocial job quality: Is a poor job better than no job at all?Psychological Medicine43: 1763–1772.
5.
DanielsKGedikliCWatsonD, et al. (2017) Job design employment practices and well-being: A systematic review of intervention studies. Ergonomics60: 1177–1196.
6.
DeciELRyanRM (2000) The ‘what’ and ‘why’ of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry11: 227–268.
7.
DuffyMKGansterDCPagonM (2002) Social undermining in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal45: 331–351.
8.
EvansMG (1985) A Monte Carlo study of the effects of correlated method variance in moderated multiple regression analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes36: 305–323.
9.
FroneMRTidwellMCO (2015) The meaning and measurement of work fatigue: Development and evaluation of the three-dimensional work fatigue inventory (3D-WFI). Journal of Occupational Health Psychology20: 273–288.
10.
González-RomáVSchaufeliWBBakkerAB, et al. (2006) Burnout and work engagement: Independent factors or opposite poles?Journal of Vocational Behavior68: 165–174.
11.
GrantAM (2007) Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Academy of Management Review32: 393–417.
12.
GrantAM (2008a) The significance of task significance: Job performance effects relational mechanisms and boundary conditions. Journal of Applied Psychology93: 108–124.
13.
GrantAM (2008b) Designing jobs to do good: Dimensions and psychological consequences of prosocial job characteristics. The Journal of Positive Psychology3: 19–39.
14.
GrantAM (2008c) Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology93: 48–58.
15.
GrantAMParkerSK (2009) 7 redesigning work design theories: The rise of relational and proactive perspectives. Academy of Management Annals3: 317–375.
16.
HackmanJROldhamGR (1975) Development of the job diagnostic survey. Journal of Applied Psychology60: 159–170.
17.
HäusserJAMojzischANieselMSchultz-HardtS (2010) Ten years on: A review of recent research on the Job Demand -Control (-Support) model and psychological well-being. Work and Stress24: 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678371003683747
18.
HumphreySENahrgangJDMorgesonFP (2007) Integrating motivational social and contextual work design features: A meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. Journal of Applied Psychology92: 1332–1356.
19.
IgicIKellerACElferingA, et al. (2017) Ten-year trajectories of stressors and resources at work: Cumulative and chronic effects on health and well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology102: 1317–1343.
20.
KamCMorinAJSMeyerJP, et al. (2016) Are commitment profiles stable and predictable? A latent transition analysis. Journal of Management42: 1462–1490.
21.
KarasekRTheorellT (1990) Healthy Work: Stress Productivity and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York: Basic Books.
22.
KarasekRAJr (1979) Job demands job decision latitude and mental strain: Implications for job redesign. Administrative Science Quarterly24(2): 285–308.
23.
KellerACIgicIMeierLL, et al. (2016) Testing job typologies and identifying at-risk subpopulations using factor mixture models. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology22: 503–516.
24.
KinickiAJVecchioRP (1994) Influences on the quality of supervisor–subordinate relations: The role of time-pressure, organizational commitment, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior15: 75–82.
25.
KnightCParkerSK (2019) How work redesign interventions affect performance: An evidence-based model from a systematic review. Human Relations74: 69–104.
26.
LeeKSuhCKimJE, et al. (2017) The impact of long working hours on psychosocial stress response among white-collar workers. Industrial Health55: 46–53.
27.
LesenerTGusyBWolterC (2019) The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress33: 76–103.
28.
McLarnonMJO’NeillTA (2018) Extensions of auxiliary variable approaches for the investigation of mediation moderation and conditional effects in mixture models. Organizational Research Methods21: 955–982.
29.
MäkikangasATolvanenAAunolaK, et al. (2018) Multilevel latent profile analysis with covariates: Identifying job characteristics profiles in hierarchical data as an example. Organizational Research Methods21: 931–954.
30.
MaslachCJacksonSELeiterMP (1996) Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 3rd ed.Menlo Park, CA: Mind Garden.
31.
MaslachCSchaufeliWBLeiterMP (2001) Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology52: 397–422.
32.
MasynKE (2013) Latent class analysis and finite mixture modelling. In: LittleTD (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods in Psychology: Vol. 2: Statistical Analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 551–611.
33.
MaunoSMäkikangasAKinnunenU (2016) A longitudinal person-centred approach to the job demands-control model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology25: 914–927.
34.
MeyerJPMorinAJS (2016) A person-centered approach to commitment research: Theory research and methodology. Journal of Organizational Behavior37: 584–612.
35.
MorgesonFPHumphreySE (2006) The work design questionnaire (WDQ): Developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. Journal of Applied Psychology91: 1321–1339.
36.
MorinAJMorizotJBoudriasJS, et al. (2011) A multifoci person-centered perspective on workplace affective commitment: A latent profile/factor mixture analysis. Organizational Research Methods14: 58–90.
37.
MorinAJSMcLarnonMJWLitalienD (2020) Mixture modeling for organizational behavior research. In: GriepYHansenS (eds) Handbook on the Temporal Dynamics of Organizational Behavior. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 351–379.
38.
MorinAJSMeyerJPCreusierJ, et al. (2016) Multiple-group analysis of similarity in latent profile solutions. Organizational Research Methods19: 231–254.
39.
ParkSLakeET (2005) Multilevel modeling of a clustered continuous outcome: Nurses’ work hours and burnout. Nursing Research54: 406–413.
40.
ParkerSK (2014) Beyond motivation: Job and work design for development health ambidexterity and more. Annual Review of Psychology65: 661–691.
41.
ParkerSK (2015) Does the Evidence and Theory Support the Good Work Design Principles? An Educational Resource. Canberra: Safe Work Australia.
42.
ParkerSKAndreiDMVan den BroeckA (2019) Poor work design begets poor work design: Capacity and willingness antecedents of individual work design behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology104: 907–928.
43.
ParkerSKVan den BroeckAHolmanD (2017) Work design influences: A synthesis of multilevel factors that affect the design of jobs. Academy of Management Annals11: 267–308.
44.
PodsakoffPMMacKenzieSBLeeJY, et al. (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology88: 879–903.
45.
RyffCD (2017) Eudaimonic well-being inequality and health: Recent findings and future directions. International Review of Economics64: 159–178.
SchaufeliWBBakkerABSalanovaM (2006) The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement66: 701–716.
48.
SiemsenERothAOliveiraP (2010) Common method bias in regression models with linear, quadratic, and interaction effects. Organizational Research Methods13: 456–476.
49.
TimsMBakkerABDerksD (2012) Development and validation of the job crafting scale. Journal of Vocational Behavior80: 173–186.
50.
Van den BroeckADe CuyperNLuyckxK, et al. (2012) Employees’ job demands–resources profiles, burnout and work engagement: A person-centred examination. Economic and Industrial Democracy33: 691–706.
51.
Van den BroeckAVansteenkisteMDe WitteH, et al. (2010) Capturing autonomy competence and relatedness at work: Construction and initial validation of the Work-related Basic Need Satisfaction scale. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology83: 981–1002.
52.
Van der DoefMMaesS (1999) The job demand-control (-support) model and psychological well-being: A review of 20 years of empirical research. Work & Stress13: 87–114.
53.
Van YperenNWHagedoornM (2003) Do high job demands increase intrinsic motivation or fatigue or both? The role of job control and job social support. Academy of Management Journal46: 339–348.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
