The ‘Porter hypothesis’ predicts that well-designed environmental regulations will stimulate businesses to innovate to reduce their environmental impact for efficiency reasons. This article analyses the impacts and anticipation effects of Australia’s carbon price on firms’ carbon reduction activities, through survey data on 466 medium-to-large Australian businesses. We build upon the Porter hypothesis by demonstrating that the anticipated impact of regulation may be as important as its implementation in triggering environmental innovation, thus developing the notion of a ‘signal’ effect.
AmbecSCohenMAElgieS, et al. (2013) The porter hypothesis at 20: Can environmental regulation enhance innovation and competitiveness?Review of Environmental Economics and Policy7: 2–22.
Australian Greenhouse Emissions Information System (AGEIS) (2018) National Inventory by Economic Sector and Scope 2 Emissions. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Department of Environment and Energy.
BirchallSJMurphyMMilneMJ (2015) Evolution of the New Zealand voluntary carbon market: An analysis of carbonzero client disclosures. Social and Environmental Accountability Journal35: 142–156.
6.
BorghesiSCrespiFD’AmatoA, et al. (2015) Carbon abatement, sector heterogeneity and policy responses: Evidence on induced eco innovations in the EU. Environmental Science and Policy54: 377–388.
7.
BrannlundRLundgrenTMarklundPO (2014) Carbon intensity in production and the effects of climate policy. Energy Policy67: 844–857.
8.
CohenMATubbA (2015) The impact of environmental regulation on firm and country competitiveness: A meta-analysis of the porter hypothesis. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2692919
9.
CrowleyK (2017) Up and down with climate politics 2013–2016: The repeal of carbon pricing in Australia. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change8: e458.
DepoersFJeanjeanTJeromeT (2016) Voluntary disclosure of greenhouse gas emissions: Contrasting the carbon disclosure project and corporate reports. Journal of Business Ethics134: 445–461.
12.
GarnautR (2008) The Garnaut Climate Change Review: Final Report. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Cambridge University Press.
13.
HaighN (2008) A view backstage of climate change environmental markets. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management15: 76–83.
14.
HoffmanVRTrautmannTHamprechtJ (2009) Regulatory uncertainty: A reason to postpone investments? Not necessarily. Journal of Management Studies46: 1227–1253.
15.
JaffeABPalmerK (1997) Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Review of Economics and Statistics79(4): 610–619.
16.
KerP (2020) Rio faces new Scope 3 carbon emissions push. The Australian Financial Review, 3February, 19.
17.
KolkAPinskeJ (2012) Multinational enterprises and climate change strategies. In: VerbekeAMerchantH (eds) Handbook of Research on International Strategic Management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 472–485.
18.
KumarasiriJJubbC (2016) Carbon emission risk and management accounting: Australian evidence. Accounting Research Journal29: 137–153.
19.
LanoiePLaurent-LucchettiJJohnstoneN, et al. (2011) Environmental policy, innovation and performance: New insights on the porter hypothesis. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy20: 803–842.
20.
LopezJMRSakhelABuschT (2017) Corporate investments and environmental regulation: The role of regulatory uncertainty, regulation-induced uncertainty, and investment history. European Management Journal35: 91–101.
21.
LundgrenTMarklundPO (2015) Climate policy, environmental performance, and profits. Journal of Productivity Analysis44: 225–235.
22.
MarkeyRMcIvorJWrightCF (2016) Employee participation and carbon emissions reduction in Australian workplaces. The International Journal of Human Resource Management27: 173–191.
23.
MartinNJRiceJL (2014) Influencing clean energy laws: An analysis of business stakeholder engagement. Business Strategy and the Environment23: 447–460.
24.
NelsonT (2018) The future of electricity generation in Australia: A case study of New South Wales. The Electricity Journal31: 42–50.
25.
NelsonTKelleySOrtonF, et al. (2010) Delayed policy certainty and electricity prices in Australia. Economic Papers29: 446–465.
26.
NybergDWrightC (2012) Justifying business responses to climate change: Discursive strategies of similarity and difference. Environment and Planning A44: 1819–1835.
PorterM (1991) America’s green strategy. Scientific American264: 168.
30.
PorterMvan der LindeC (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives9: 97–118.
31.
RametseN (2015) Measuring the costs of implementing the former carbon tax for Australian liable entities. New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and Policy21: 90–213.
32.
ShoveE (2010) Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning A42: 1273–1285.
33.
SimshauserPTiernanA (2019) Climate change policy discontinuity and its effects on Australia’s national electricity market. Australian Journal of Public Administration78: 17–36.
34.
Spies-ButcherBStilwellF (2009) Climate change policy and economic recession. Journal of Australian Political Economy63: 108–125.
TeeterPSandbergJ (2017) Constraining or enabling green capability development? How policy uncertainty affects organizational responses to flexible environmental regulations. British Journal of Management28: 649–665.
37.
UnruhGC (2002) Escaping carbon lock-in. Energy Policy30: 317–325.
38.
WhitmarshLO’NeillSLorenzoniI (2011) Climate change or social change? Debate within, amongst, and beyond disciplines. Environment and Planning A43: 258–261.
39.
WilsonCChattertonT (2011) Multiple models to inform climate change policy: A pragmatic response to the ‘beyond the ABC’ debate. Environment and Planning A43: 2781–2787.
