This article investigates whether different levels of investor protection affect the equity market’s valuation of non-controlling interests (NCIs) in a consolidated corporate entity. Using a set of publicly listed European firms, our findings suggest a positive (negative) association of NCIs with parent companies’ share prices in countries with low (high) levels of investor protection. We interpret the findings as evidence that when non-controlling investors are not well-protected, parent companies have an opportunity to extract rents from non-controlling owners, leading to a positive valuation of NCIs’ equity. However, in countries where non-controlling investors are well-protected, parent companies are not able to extract rents but still must monitor and govern the related subsidiary; thus, NCIs become a net cost, and the relation inverts.
AbadCGarcia-BordollaAGarrodN, et al. (2000) An evaluation of the value relevance of consolidated versus unconsolidated accounting information: Evidence from quoted Spanish firms. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting11: 156–177.
2.
AlbuquerqueRWangN (2008) Agency conflicts, investment, and asset pricing. Journal of Finance63: 1–40.
3.
AliAHwangL (2000) Country-specific factors related to financial reporting and the value relevance of accounting data. Journal of Accounting Research38: 1–21.
4.
AndréPFilipAPaugamL (2016) Examining the patterns of goodwill impairments in Europe and the US. Accounting in Europe13: 329–352.
5.
BaeKJeongSW (2007) The value-relevance of earnings and book value, ownership structure, and business group affiliation: Evidence from Korean business groups. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting34: 740–766.
6.
BarthMClinchG (2009) Scale effects in capital markets-based accounting research. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting36: 253–288.
7.
BarthMLandsmanWLangM (2008) International accounting standards and accounting quality. Journal of Accounting Research46: 467–498.
8.
BeuselinckCBlancoBGarcía LaraJM (2017) The role of foreign shareholders in disciplining financial reporting. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting44: 558–592.
9.
Boonlert-U-ThaiKMeekGNabarS (2006) Earnings attributes and investor-protection: International evidence. The International Journal of Accounting41: 327–357.
10.
BozecYLaurinC (2008) Large shareholder entrenchment and performance: Empirical evidence from Canada. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting35: 25–49.
11.
ChinC-HChenY-JHsiehT-S (2009) International diversification, ownership structure, legal origin, and earnings management: Evidence from Taiwan. Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Finance24: 233–262.
12.
ClaessensSDjankovSLangLHP (2000) The separation of ownership and control in east Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics58: 81–112.
13.
ClaessensSDjankovSFanJ, et al. (1999) Expropriation of minority shareholders: Evidence from east Asia. Policy Research Paper, Paper No. 2088: Washington, DC: World Bank.
14.
CrociEPetmezasD (2010) Minority shareholders’ wealth effects and stock market development: Evidence from increase-in-ownership M&As. Journal of Banking and Finance34: 681–694.
15.
DeFondMHungMTrezevanR (2007) Investor protection and the information content of annual earnings announcements: International evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics43: 37–67.
16.
DjankovSLa PortaRLopez-de- SilanesF, et al. (2008) The law and economics of self-dealing. Journal of Financial Economics88: 430–465.
17.
DrakeMSGuestNMTwedtBJ (2014) The media and mispricing: The role of the business press in the pricing of the accounting information. The Accounting Review89: 1673–1701.
18.
DyckAZingalesL (2004) Private benefits of control: An international comparison. The Journal of Finance59: 537–600.
19.
FerreiraMKeswaniAMiguelA, et al. (2012) The determinants of mutual fund performance: A cross-country study. Review of Financial Studies17: 483–525.
20.
HailL (2013) Financial reporting: Relevance lost or relevance regained?Accounting and Business Research43: 329–358.
21.
HaynC (1995) The information content of losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics20: 125–153.
22.
HeckmanJ (1976) The common structure of statistical models of truncation, sample selection, and limited dependent variables and a simple estimator for such models. Annals of Economic and Social Measurement5: 475–492.
23.
HeckmanJ (1979) The sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica47: 153–162.
24.
HoSWongKS (2001) A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation10: 139–156.
25.
HongH (2013) Does mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards decrease the voting premium for dual-class shares?The Accounting Review88: 1289–1325.
26.
HsuAWDuhRChengK (2012) Does the control-based approach to consolidated statements better reflect market value than the ownership-based approach?The International Journal of Accounting47: 198–225.
27.
HughesJ (2009) Corporate value, ultimate control and law protection for investors in western Europe. Management Accounting Research20: 41–52.
28.
HungMSubramanyamK (2007) Financial statement effects of adopting international accounting standards: The case of Germany. Review of Accounting Studies12: 623–657.
29.
International Accounting Standards Board (2004) IFRS 3: Business Combinations. London: International Accounting Standards Board.
30.
International Accounting Standards Board (2008) IFRS 3: Business Combinations (revised). London: International Accounting Standards Board.
KhalilSMagnanMCohenJ (2008) Dual-class shares and audit pricing: Evidence from the Canadian markets. Auditing27: 199–216.
35.
KvaalENobesCW (2012) IFRS policy changes and the continuation of national patterns of IFRS practice. European Accounting Review21: 343–371.
36.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA (1999) Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance54: 471–518.
37.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA (2000) Investor protection and corporate governance. Journal of Financial Economics59: 3–27.
38.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA (2006) What works in securities laws?Journal of Finance61: 1–32.
39.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA (2008) The economic consequences of legal origins. Journal of Economic Literature46: 285–233.
40.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA, et al. (1997) Legal determinants of external finance. Journal of Finance52: 1131–1150.
41.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA, et al. (1998) Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy106: 1113–1155.
42.
La PortaRLopez-de-SilanesFShleiferA, et al. (2002) Investor protection and corporate valuation. Journal of Finance57: 1147–1170.
43.
LandsmanWMaydewEThornockJ (2012) The information content of annual earnings announcements and mandatory adoption of IFRS. Journal of Accounting and Economics53: 34–54.
44.
LeeL (1976) Estimation of limited variable models by two-stage methods. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Rochester, New York.
45.
LeeL (1978) Unionism and wage rates: A simultaneous equations model with qualitative and limited dependent variables. International Economic Review19: 415–433.
46.
LeuzC (2010) Different approaches to corporate reporting regulation: How jurisdictions differ and why. Accounting and Business Research40: 229–256.
47.
LeuzCNandaDWysockiP (2003) Earnings management and investor protection: An international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics69: 505–527.
48.
LichtAGoldschmidtCSchwartzS (2007) Culture rules: The foundations of the rule of law and other norms of governance. Journal of Comparative Economics37: 659–688.
49.
LinCMaYMalatestaP, et al. (2011) Ownership structure and the cost of corporate borrowing. Journal of Financial Economics100: 1–23.
50.
LinCMicahSOBeiberS (2018) Managerial risk-taking incentives and merger decisions. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis53: 643–680.
51.
LopesAILourençoIC (2014) Determinants of engaging in business combinations through partial acquisitions. Spanish Journal of Finance and Accounting43: 3–28.
52.
LopesAILourençoICSolimanMT (2013) Do alternative methods of reporting non-controlling interests really matter?Australian Journal of Management38: 7–30.
53.
López-de-ForondaOLópez-IturriagaFJSantamaría-MariscalM (2007) Ownership structure, sharing of control and legal framework: International evidence. Corporate Governance: An International Review15: 1130–1143.
54.
LourençoIJeffreyCBrancoM, et al. (2014) The value relevance of reputation for sustainability leadership. Journal of Business Ethics119: 17–28.
55.
OhlsonJA (1995) Earnings, book values, and dividends in equity valuation. Contemporary Accounting Research11: 661–687.
56.
PaganoMVolpinP (2001) The political economy of finance. Oxford Review of Economic Policy17: 502–519.
57.
RahmanAYammeesriJPereraH (2010) Financial reporting quality in international settings: A comparative study of the USA, Japan, Thailand, France and Germany. The International Journal of Accounting4: 1–34.
58.
ReesLThomasW (2010) The stock price effects of changes in dispersion of investor beliefs during earnings announcements. Review of Accounting Studies15: 1–31.
59.
ReeseWAWeisbachMJr (2002) Protection of minority shareholder interests, cross-listings in the United States, and subsequent equity offerings. Journal of Financial Economics66: 65–104.
60.
SchmidtM (2013) Equity and liabilities – A discussion of IAS 32 and a critique of the classification. Accounting in Europe10: 201–222.
61.
SchnyderGSiemsMAguileraRV (2018) Twenty years of ‘law and finance’: Time to take law seriously. Socio-Economic Review. Epub ahead of print 2 November 2018. DOI: 10.1093/ser/mwy041.
62.
ShleiferAVishnyR (1997) A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance52: 737–783.
63.
SoSSmithM (2009) Value relevance of IAS 27 (2003) revision on presentation of non-controlling interest: Evidence from Hong Kong. Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting20: 166–198.
64.
SwansonZ (2010) Minority stockholder information relevance: Wealth effects and/or monitoring?Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal14: 87–101.
