Substantial evidence suggests that managerial mental models play an important role in firm performance. Yet managerial mental models are not static but dynamic. This research investigates the creation and evolution of mental models over time and how this dynamic process influences strategic choice and firm performance. We adopt the causal loop diagramming method, with in-depth case analysis over a period of 12 years, as the primary investigatory approach. Our research contributes to knowledge by identifying the shared mental model of the top management team, represented in the causal loop diagrams, for each stage of the company’s development. Our findings suggest that the dynamics of managerial mental models explains the changes in firm performance over time.
BagdasarovZJohnsonJFMacDougallAEet al. (2016) Mental models and ethical decision making: The mediating role of sensemaking. Journal of Business Ethics138: 133–144.
2.
BanduraA (1988) Organisational applications of social cognitive theory. Australian Journal of Management13: 275–302.
BennerMJTripsasM (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal33: 277–302.
ChoTSHambrickDC (2006) Attention as the mediator between top management team characteristics and strategic change: The case of airline deregulation. Organization Science17: 453–469.
7.
Chow-ChuaCGohMBoon WanT (2003) Does ISO 9000 certification improve business performance?International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management20: 936–953.
8.
CsaszarFALevinthalDA (2015) Mental representation and the discovery of new strategies. Strategic Management Journal37: 2031–2049.
9.
DavisJPEisenhardtKMBinghamCB (2007) Developing theory through simulation methods. Academy of Management Review32: 480–499.
10.
DenrellJ (2004) Random walks and sustained competitive advantage. Management Science50: 922–934.
11.
FassinYWernerAVan RossemAet al. (2015) CSR and related terms in SME owner–managers’ mental models in six European countries: National context matters. Journal of Business Ethics128: 433–456.
GaryMSWoodRE (2016) Unpacking mental models through laboratory experiments. System Dynamics Review32: 99–127.
14.
GaryMSWoodREPillingerT (2012) Enhancing mental models, analogical transfer, and performance in strategic decision making. Strategic Management Journal33: 1229–1246.
15.
GaryMSYangMMYettonPet al. (2017) Stretch goals and the distribution of organizational performance. Organization Science28: 395–410.
16.
GavettiG (2005) Cognition and hierarchy: Rethinking the microfoundations of capabilities’ development. Organization Science16: 599–617.
17.
GavettiGLevinthalD (2000) Looking forward and looking backward: Cognitive and experiential search. Administrative Science Quarterly45: 113–137.
18.
GinsbergA (1988) Measuring and modelling changes in strategy: Theoretical foundations and empirical directions. Strategic Management Journal9: 559–575.
19.
HagelJRayportJF (1997) The coming battle for customer information. Harvard Business Review75: 64–77.
20.
HallRI (1984) The natural logic of management policy making: Its implications for the survival of an organization. Management Science30: 905–927.
21.
HodgkinsonGPMauleAJBownNJ (2004) Causal cognitive mapping in the organizational strategy field: A comparison of alternative elicitation procedures. Organizational Research Methods7: 3–26.
22.
KaplanSTripsasM (2008) Thinking about technology: Applying a cognitive lens to technical change. Research Policy37: 790–805.
23.
KarakayaFYannopoulosP (2010) Defensive strategy framework in global markets. European Journal of Marketing44: 1077–1100.
24.
KnightDPearceCLSmithKGet al. (1999) Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal20: 445–465.
25.
KroesJRManikasAS (2014) Cash flow management and manufacturing firm financial performance: A longitudinal perspective. International Journal of Production Economics148: 37–50.
26.
LeeDDFaffRWLangfield-SmithK (2009) Revisiting the vexing question: Does superior corporate social performance lead to improved financial performance?Australian Journal of Management34: 21–49.
27.
LincolnYGubaE (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
28.
McCombSA (2007) Mental model convergence: The shift from being an individual to being a team member. In: DansereauFYammarinoFJ (eds) Multi-Level Issues in Organizations and Time. Bingley: Emerald Group, pp. 95–147.
29.
MartignoniDMenonASiggelkowN (2016) Consequences of misspecified mental models: Contrasting effects and the role of cognitive fit. Strategic Management Journal37: 2545–2568.
30.
MohammedSFerzandiLHamiltonK (2010) Metaphor no more: A 15-year review of the team mental model construct. Journal of Management36: 876–910.
31.
MorecroftJDWStermanJ (1994) Modeling for Learning Organizations. Portland, OR: Productivity Press.
32.
MossJDStineB (1993) Cash conversion cycle and firm size: A study of retail firms. Managerial Finance19: 25–34.
33.
OlivaRStermanJ (2001) Cutting corners and working overtime: Quality erosion in the service industry. Management Science47: 894–914.
34.
PattonMQ (1980) Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Beverly Hills, CA: SAGE.
35.
PerlowLAOkhuysenGARepenningNP (2002) The speed trap: Exploring the relationship between decision making and temporal context. Academy of Management Journal45: 931–955.
36.
PoracJFThomasHBaden-FullerC (1989) Competitive groups as cognitive communities: The case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies26: 397–416.
37.
PrahaladCKBettisRA (1986) The dominant logic: A new linkage between diversity and performance. Strategic Management Journal7: 485–501.
RegerRPalmerT (1996) Managerial categorization of competitors: Using old maps to navigate new environments. Organization Science7: 22–39.
40.
RepenningNPStermanJ (2002) Capability traps and self-confirming attribution errors in the dynamics of process improvement. Administrative Science Quarterly47: 265–295.
41.
RomanelliETushmanML (1986) Inertia, environments, and strategic choice: A quasi-experimental design for comparative-longitudinal research. Management Science32: 608–621.
42.
RoxasBCoetzerA (2012) Institutional environment, managerial attitudes and environmental sustainability orientation of small firms. Journal of Business Ethics111: 461–476.
43.
RudolphJWRepenningNP (2002) Disaster dynamics: Understanding the role of quantity in organizational collapse. Administrative Science Quarterly47: 1–30.
44.
SheaTCooperBKCieriHDet al. (2012) Evaluation of a perceived organisational performance scale using Rasch model analysis. Australian Journal of Management37: 507–522.
45.
SimonHA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. The Quarterly Journal of Economics69: 99–118.
46.
SimonHA (1991) Bounded rationality and organizational learning. Organization Science2: 125–134.
47.
StermanJ (2000) Business Dynamics: Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
48.
StermanJHendersonRBeinhockerEet al. (2007) Getting big too fast: Strategic dynamics with increasing returns and bounded rationality. Management Science53: 683–696.
49.
StermanJRepenningNPKofmanF (1997) Unanticipated side effects of successful quality programs: Exploring a paradox of organizational improvement. Management Science43: 503–521.
50.
TerziovskiMSamsonDDowD (1997) The business value of quality management systems certification. Evidence from Australia and New Zealand. Journal of Operations Management15: 1–18.
51.
ThomasA (1988) Does leadership make a difference to organizational performance?Administrative Science Quarterly33: 388–400.
52.
TripsasMGavettiG (2000) Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: Evidence from digital imaging. Strategic Management Journal21: 1147–1161.
53.
VandenboschBHigginsC (1996) Information acquisition and mental models: An investigation into the relationship between behaviour and learning. Information Systems Research7: 198–214.
54.
WalshJP (1995) Managerial and organizational cognition: Notes from a trip down memory lane. Organization Science6: 280–321.
55.
WelchE (2003) The relationship between ownership structure and performance in listed Australian companies. Australian Journal of Management28: 287–305.
56.
YangMMJiangHGaryMS (2017) Challenging learning goals improve performance in dynamically complex microworld simulations. System Dynamics Review32: 204–232.
57.
YangMMYoungSLiSJet al. (2016) Using system dynamics to investigate how belief systems influence the process of organizational change. Systems Research and Behavioral Science34: 94–108.
