In this study, we examine new drivers that generate a disposition toward entrepreneurial activity in family firms and how the strategic involvement of the board of directors (SIBD) moderates the relationships between these drivers (image of the firm, willingness to change, and access to financial resources) and entrepreneurial orientation (EO). Using a sample of 230 family small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), our results confirm that a good family firm image and willingness to change may be powerful tools that stimulate a firm to develop entrepreneurial activities. The negative relationship between access to financial resources and EO may relate to the false belief that financial resources help firms be more creative and to maintaining family control of the firm and the socioemotional endowment. Contrary to our expectations, we also find that the SIBD negatively influences the relationship between the above drivers and EO, pointing to the need for more open boards of directors in family SMEs in order to develop and implement entrepreneurial strategies.
AlvarezSABusenitzLW (2001) The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management27: 755–775.
2.
ArmstrongJSOvertonTS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research14: 396–402.
3.
ArosaBIturraldeTMasedaA (2010) Ownership structure and firm performance in non-listed firms: Evidence from Spain. Journal of Family Business Strategy1: 88–96.
4.
AstrachanJHKleinSBSmyrniosKX (2002) The F-PEC scale of family influence: A proposal for solving the family business definition problem. Family Business Review15: 45–58.
5.
AzimMI (2012) Corporate governance mechanisms and their impact on company performance: A structural equation model analysis. Australian Journal of Management37: 481–505.
6.
BagozziRYiY (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science16: 74–97.
7.
BammensYVoorderckersWVan GilsA (2008) Boards of directors in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics31: 163–180.
8.
BarrickMRMountMK (1993) Autonomy as a moderator of the relationships between the big five personality dimensions and job performance. Journal of Applied Psychology78: 111–118.
9.
BergfeldMHWeberFM (2011) Dynasties of innovation: Highly performing German family firms and the owners’ role for innovation. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management13: 80–94.
10.
BerghmanLMatthyssensPStreukensSet al. (2013) Deliberate learning mechanisms for stimulating strategic innovation capacity. Long Range Planning46: 39–71.
11.
BerronePCruzCGomez-MejiaLR (2012) Socioemotional wealth in family firms: Theoretical dimensions, assessment approaches, and agenda for future research. Family Business Review25: 258–279.
12.
BolingJRPieperTMCovinJG (2015) CEO tenure and entrepreneurial orientation within family and nonfamily firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice40: 891–913.
13.
CalabròATorchiaMPukallTet al. (2013) The influence of ownership structure and board strategic involvement on international sales: The moderating effect of family involvement. International Business Review22: 509–523.
14.
CarneyM (2005) Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice29: 249–265.
15.
CarpenterMAWestphalJD (2001) The strategic context of external network ties: Examining impact of director appointments on board involvement in strategic decision making. Academy of Management Journal4: 639–660.
16.
CasillasJCMorenoAMBarberoJL (2011) Entrepreneurial orientation of family firms: Family and environmental dimensions. Journal of Family Business Strategy2: 90–100.
17.
CasselCHacklPWestlundA (1999) Robustness of partial least-squares method for estimating latent variable quality structures. Journal of Applied Statistics26: 435–446.
18.
ChandlerGNMcEvoyGM (2000) Human resource management, TQM, and firm performance in small and medium-size enterprises. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice25: 43–58.
19.
ChinWW (1998) The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. In: MarcoulidesG (ed.) Modern Methods for Business Research. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 295–336.
20.
ChiricoFSalvatoC (2008) Knowledge integration and dynamic organizational adaptation in family firms. Family Business Review21: 169–181.
21.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
22.
CorbettaGSalvatoC (2004) Self-serving or self-actualizing? Models of man and agency costs in different types of family firms: A commentary on “comparing the agency costs of family and non-family firms: Conceptual issues and exploratory evidence.”Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28: 355–362.
23.
CovinJGSlevinDP (1989) Strategic management of small firms in hostile and benign environments. Strategic Management Journal10: 75–87.
24.
CovinJGSlevinDP (1991) A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice16: 7–25.
25.
CovinJGWalesWJ (2012) The measurement of entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36: 677–702.
26.
CovinJGGreenKMSlevinDP (2006) Strategic process effects on the entrepreneurial orientation–sales growth rate relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30: 57–81.
27.
CraigJBDibrellCDavisPS (2008) Leveraging family-based brand identity to enhance firm competitiveness and performance in family businesses. Journal of Small Business Management46: 351–371.
28.
CruzCNordqvistM (2012) Entrepreneurial orientation in family firms: A generational perspective. Small Business Economics38: 33–49.
29.
De ClercqDDimovDThongpapanlNT (2010) The moderating impact of internal social exchange processes on the entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship. Journal of Business Venturing25: 87–103.
30.
De MassisAFrattiniFLichtenthalerU (2013) Research on technological innovation in family firms: Present debates and future directions. Family Business Review26: 10–31.
31.
De MezaDSoutheyC (1996) The borrower’s curse: Optimism, finance and entrepreneurship. The Economic Journal106: 375–386.
32.
DyerGWhettenDA (2006) Family firms and social responsibility: Preliminary evidence from the S&P 500. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30: 785–802.
33.
EddlestonKAKellermannsFWSarathyR (2008) Resource configuration in family firms: Linking resources, strategic planning and technological opportunities to performance. Journal of Management Studies45: 26–50.
34.
EddlestonKAKellermannsFWZellwegerTM (2012) Exploring the entrepreneurial behavior of family firms: Does the stewardship perspective explain differences?Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice36: 347–367.
35.
FalkRFMillerNB (1992) A Primer for Soft Modelling. Akron, OH: University of Akron Press.
36.
FillisI (2003) Image, reputation, and identity issues in the arts and crafts organization. Corporate Reputation Review6: 239–251.
37.
ForbesDPMillikenFJ (1999) Cognition and corporate governance: Understanding boards of directors as strategic decision-making groups. Academy of Management Review24: 489–505.
38.
GefenDStraubDBoudreauMC (2000) Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems4: Article 7.
39.
GeorgeG (2005) Slack resources and the performance of privately held firms. Academy of Management Journal48: 661–676.
40.
GodfreyPC (2005) The relationship between corporate philanthropy and shareholder wealth: A risk management perspective. Academy of Management Review30: 777–798.
41.
GoelSJonesRJ (2016) Entrepreneurial exploration and exploitation in family business: A systematic review and future directions. Family Business Review29: 94–120.
42.
Gomez-MejiaLRCruzCBerronePet al. (2011) The bind that ties: Socioemotional wealth preservation in family firms. The Academy of Management Annals5: 653–707.
43.
Gomez-MejiaLRHaynesKTNúñez-NickelMet al. (2007) Socioemotional wealth and business risks in family-controlled firms: Evidence from Spanish olive oil mills. Administrative Science Quarterly52: 106–137.
44.
Gomez-MejiaLRMakriMKintanaML (2010) Diversification decisions in family-controlled firms. Journal of Management Studies47: 223–252.
45.
GötzOLiehr-GobbersKKrafftM (2010) Evaluation of structural equation models using the Partial Least Squares (PLS) approach. In: VinziVChinWWHenselerJet al (eds) Handbook of Partial Least Squares. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 691–711.
46.
GraySHarymawanINowlandJ (2016) Political and government connections on corporate boards in Australia: Good for business?Australian Journal of Management41: 3–26.
47.
GreenKMCovinJGSlevinDP (2008) Exploring the relationship between strategic reactiveness and entrepreneurial orientation: The role of structure-style fit. Journal of Business Venturing28: 356–383.
48.
GruberMHeinemannFBrettelMet al. (2010) Configurations of resources and capabilities and their performance implications: An exploratory study on technology ventures. Strategic Management Journal31: 1337–1356.
49.
HairJFSarstedtMRingleCMet al. (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science40: 414–433.
50.
HarmanHH (1967) Modem Factor Analysis. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
51.
HendryKKielGC (2004) The role of the board in firm strategy: Integrating agency and organisational control perspectives. Corporate Governance: An International Review12: 500–520.
52.
HenselerJRingleCSinkovicsR (2009) The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing20: 277–319.
53.
HillmanAJDalzielT (2003) Boards of directors and firm performance: Integrating agency and resource dependence perspectives. Academy of Management Review28: 383–396.
54.
JansenJJVan Den BoschFAVolberdaHW (2006) Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science52: 1661–1674.
55.
JarvisCBMacKenzieSBPodsakoffPM (2003) A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research30: 199–218.
56.
JaskiewiczPKleinS (2007) The impact of goal alignment on board composition and board size in family businesses. Journal of Business Research60: 1080–1089.
57.
KärremanDRylanderA (2008) Managing meaning through branding—The case of a consulting firm. Organization Studies29: 103–125.
58.
KellermannsFWEddlestonKA (2006) Corporate entrepreneurship in family firms: A family perspective. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice30: 809–830.
59.
KellermannsFWEddlestonKABarnettTet al. (2008) An exploratory study of family member characteristics and involvement: Effects on entrepreneurial behavior in the family firm. Family Business Review1: 1–14.
60.
KhlifHAhmedKSouissiM (2016) Ownership structure and voluntary disclosure: A synthesis of empirical studies. Australian Journal of Management42: 376–403.
61.
KimBBurnsMLPrescottJE (2009) The strategic role of the board: The impact of board structure on top management team strategic action capability. Corporate Governance: An International Review17: 728–743.
62.
KollmannTStöckmannC (2014) Filling the entrepreneurial orientation–performance gap: The mediating effects of exploratory and exploitative innovations. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice38: 1001–1026.
63.
KortmannS (2014) The mediating role of strategic orientations on the relationship between ambidexterity-oriented decisions and innovative ambidexterity. Journal of Product Innovation Management32: 666–684.
64.
LandauCBockC (2013) Value creation through vertical intervention of corporate centres in single business units of unrelated diversified portfolios—The case of private equity firms. Long Range Planning46: 97–124.
65.
Le Breton-MillerIMillerDBaresF (2015) Governance and entrepreneurship in family firms: Agency, behavioral agency and resource-based comparison. Journal of Family Business Strategy6: 58–62.
66.
LiangHSarafNHuQet al. (2007). Assimilation of enterprise systems: The effect of institutional pressures and the mediating role of top management. MIS Quarterly31: 59–87.
67.
LiangXWangLCuiZ (2014) Chinese private firms and internationalization effects of family involvement in management and family ownership. Family Business Review27: 126–141.
68.
LumpkinGTDessGG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review21: 135–172.
69.
LumpkinGTDessGG (2001) Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing16: 429–451.
70.
McCarthySOliverBVerreynneML (2017) Bank financing and credit rationing of Australian SMEs. Australian Journal of Management42: 58–85.
71.
MacholdSHuseMMinichilliAet al. (2011) Board leadership and strategy involvement in small firms: A team production approach. Corporate Governance: An International Review19: 368–383.
72.
MahtoRVDavisPSPearceIIet al. (2010) Satisfaction with firm performance in family businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice34: 985–1001.
73.
MasedaAIturraldeTArosaB (2015) Impact of outsiders on firm performance over different generations of family-owned SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management53: 1203–1218.
74.
MemiliEEddlestonKAKellermannsFWet al. (2010) The critical path to family firm success through entrepreneurial risk taking and image. Journal of Family Business Strategy1: 200–209.
75.
MengucBAuhS (2010) Development and return on execution of product innovation capabilities: The role of organizational structure. Industrial Marketing Management39: 820–831.
76.
MillerD (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Management Science29: 770–792.
77.
MillerD (2011) Miller (1983) revisited: A reflection on EO research and some suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice35: 873–894.
78.
MillerDLe Breton-MillerI (2005) Managing for the Long Run: Lessons in Competitive Advantage from Great Family Businesses. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Press.
79.
MillerDLe Breton-MillerI (2006) Family governance and firm performance: Agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review19: 73–87.
80.
MillerDSteierLLe Breton-MillerI (2003) Lost in time: Intergenerational succession, change, and failure in family business. Journal of Business Venturing18: 513–531.
81.
MinichilliAZattoniAZonaF (2009) Making boards effective: An empirical examination of board task performance. British Journal of Management20: 55–74.
82.
MorenoAMCasillasJC (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation and growth of SMEs: A causal model. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice32: 507–528.
83.
NaldiLNordqvistMSjöbergKet al. (2007) Entrepreneurial orientation, risk taking, and performance in family firms. Family Business Review20: 33–47.
84.
NordqvistMMelinL (2010) The promise of the strategy as practice perspective for family business strategy research. Journal of Family Business Strategy1: 15–25.
85.
PayneTBensonGSFinegoldDL (2009) Corporate board attributes, team effectiveness and financial performance. Journal of Management Studies46: 704–731.
86.
PodsakoffPMOrganDW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management12: 531–544.
87.
PuglieseABezemerPJZattoniAet al. (2009) Boards of directors’ contribution to strategy: A literature review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review17: 292–306.
88.
RandersonKBettinelliCFayollerAet al. (2015) Family entrepreneurship as a field of research: Exploring its contours and contents. Journal of Family Business Strategy6: 143–154.
89.
RauchAWiklundJLumpkinGTet al. (2009) Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice33: 761–787.
90.
RingleCMWendeSWillA (2005) SmartPLS 2.0. Hamburg: University of Hamburg. Available at: www.smartpls.de
91.
RobesonDO’ConnorGC (2013) Boards of directors, innovation, and performance: An exploration at multiple levels. Journal of Product Innovation Management30: 608–625.
92.
SalvatoC (2004) Predictors of entrepreneurship in family firms. The Journal of Private Equity7: 68–76.
93.
SalvatoCChiricoFSharmaP (2010) A farewell to the business: Championing exit and continuity in entrepreneurial family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development22: 321–348.
94.
Sanchez-FamosoVMasedaAIturraldeT (2014) The role of internal social capital in organisational innovation. An empirical study of family firms. European Management Journal32: 950–962.
95.
SchepersJVoordeckersWSteijversTet al. (2014) The entrepreneurial orientation–performance relationship in private family firms: The moderating role of socioemotional wealth. Small Business Economics43: 39–55.
96.
SciasciaSMazzolaP (2008) Family involvement in ownership and management: Exploring nonlinear effects on performance. Family Business Review21: 331–345.
97.
SciasciaSMazzolaPChiricoF (2013) Generational involvement in the top management team of family firms: Exploring nonlinear effects on entrepreneurial orientation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice37: 69–85.
98.
SciasciaSNaldiLHunterE (2006) Market orientation as determinant of entrepreneurship: An empirical investigation on SMEs. The International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal2: 21–38.
99.
ScottSGLaneVR (2000) A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review25: 43–62.
100.
SimonMShraderRC (2012) Entrepreneurial actions and optimistic overconfidence: The role of motivated reasoning in new product introductions. Journal of Business Venturing27: 291–309.
101.
SirmonDGHittMA (2003) Managing resources: Linking unique resources, management, and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice27: 339–358.
102.
StamWElfringT (2008) Entrepreneurial orientation and new venture performance: The moderating role of intra- and extraindustry social capital. Academy of Management Journal51: 97–111.
103.
SteijversTVoordeckersW (2009) Private family ownership and the agency costs of debt. Family Business Review22: 333–346.
104.
SundaramurthyCKreinerGE (2008) Governing by managing identity boundaries: The case of family businesses. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice32: 415–436.
105.
TenenhausMVinziVEChatelinYMet al. (2005) PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis48: 159–205.
106.
ThaiMTTTurkinaE (2014) Macro-level determinants of formal entrepreneurship versus informal entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing29: 490–510.
107.
TihanyiLJohnsonRAHoskissonREet al. (2003) Institutional ownership differences and international diversification: The effects of boards of directors and technological opportunity. Academy of Management Journal46: 195–211.
108.
Van DoornSHeydenMLVolberdaHW (2017) Enhancing entrepreneurial orientation in dynamic environments: The interplay between top management team advice-seeking and absorptive capacity. Long Range Planning50: 134–144.
109.
VoordeckersWVan GilsAVan den HeuvelJ (2007) Board composition in small and medium-sized family firms. Journal of Small Business Management45: 137–156.
110.
VosEYehAJYCarterSet al. (2007) The happy story of small business financing. Journal of Banking & Finance31: 2648–2672.
111.
VossGBSirdeshmukhDVossZG (2008) The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal51: 147–164.
112.
WestheadPHoworthC (2006) Ownership and management issues associated with family firm performance and company objectives. Family Business Review19: 301–316.
113.
WestheadPHoworthCCowlingM (2002) Ownership and management issues in first generation and multi-generation family firms. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development14: 247–269.
114.
WiklundJShepherdD (2003) Knowledge-based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium-sized businesses. Strategic Management Journal24: 1307–1314.
115.
WiklundJShepherdD (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: A configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing20: 71–91.
116.
WildenRGuderganSPNielsenBBet al. (2013) Dynamic capabilities and performance: Strategy, structure and environment. Long Range Planning46: 72–96.
117.
ZahraSA (2005) Entrepreneurial risk taking in family firms. Family Business Review18: 23–40.
118.
ZahraSAHaytonJSalvatoC (2004) Entrepreneurship in family vs. non family firms: A resource based analysis of the effect of organizational culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice28: 363–381.
119.
ZattoniAPuglieseA (2012) Boards contribution to strategy and innovation. In: ClarkeT and Branson D (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Corporate Governance. Sidney, NSW: Sage Publications Limited, pp. 217–233.
120.
ZattoniAGnanLHuseM (2015) Does family involvement influence firm performance? Exploring the mediating effects of board processes and tasks. Journal of Management41: 1214–1243.
121.
ZellwegerTMEddlestonKAKellermannsFW (2010) Exploring the concept of familiness: Introducing family firm identity. Journal of Family Business Strategy1: 54–63.
122.
ZellwegerTMNasonRSNordqvistM (2012) From longevity of firms to transgenerational entrepreneurship of families introducing family entrepreneurial orientation. Family Business Review25: 136–155.
