This article investigates the impact of global financial integration on liquidity risk. Using the network approach and bank-level data for 95 countries, we find weak asymmetry in the relationship between net stable funding and financial connectedness. Our results suggest that the degree of connectedness between banks is inversely related to funding stability. We also find that banks that are strongly connected to important lenders take on more risks relative to those that have independent access to finance in the financial network. Our results are consistent and invariant when either internal or external instruments are used to resolve econometric issues.
AcemogluDCarvalhoVMOzdaglarAet al. (2012) The network origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica80: 1977–2016.
2.
AllenDEPowellR (2012) The fluctuating default risk of Australian banks. Australian Journal of Management37: 297–325.
3.
AllenFBabusA (2008) Networks in finance. In: KleindorferPWindYGuntherR (eds) The Network Challenge: Strategy, Profit, and Risk in an Interlinked World. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing, pp. 367–382.
4.
AllenFGaleD (2000) Financial contagion. Journal of Political Economy108: 1–33.
5.
AviatACoeurdacierN (2007) The geography of trade in goods and asset holdings. Journal of International Economics71: 22–51.
6.
Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2010) Basel III: International framework for liquidity risk measurement, standards and monitoring. Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs188.pdf
7.
BattistonSGattiDDGallegatiMet al. (2012) Liaisons Dangereuses: Increasing connectivity, risk sharing, and systemic risk. Journal of Economic Dynamics & Control36: 1121–1141.
8.
BaumCFSchafferMEStillmanS (2007) Ivreg2: Stata module for extended instrumental variables/2SLS, GMM and AC/HAC, LIML, and K-class regression. Stata Journal7: 465–506.
9.
BechMLAtalayE (2010) The topology of the federal funds market. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications389: 5223–5246.
BergerANBouwmanCHS (2009) Bank liquidity creation. Review of Financial Studies22: 3779–3837.
12.
BhattacharyaMInekweJNValenzuelaMR (2018) Financial integration in Africa: New evidence using network approach. Economic Modelling. Epub ahead of print 7 March 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.02.013.
BossMElsingerHSummerMet al. (2004) Network topology of the interbank market. Quantitative Finance4: 677–684.
15.
BrownCDoVTrevarthenO (2016) Liquidity shock management: Lessons from Australian banks. Australian Journal of Management42: 637–652.
16.
BrunnermeierMKPedersenLH (2009) Market liquidity and funding liquidity. Review of Financial Studies22: 2201–2238.
17.
BuchMCGoldbergSL (2015) International banking and liquidity risk transmission: Lessons from across countries. IMF Economic Review63: 377–410.
18.
CaballeroJ (2015) Banking crises and financial integration: Insights from networks science. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money34: 127–146.
19.
CastiglionesiFFeriozziFLorenzoniG (2017) Financial integration and liquidity crises. Management Science. Epub ahead of print 11 October 2017. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.2017.2841.
20.
Chan-LauJAMitraSOngLL (2007) Contagion risk in the international banking system and implications for London as a global financial center (Epub). IMF Working Paper, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, USA, 1April.
21.
ChiL-CTangT-C (2006) Bankruptcy prediction: Application of logit analysis in export credit risks. Australian Journal of Management31: 17–27.
22.
CifuentesRFerrucciGShinHS (2005) Liquidity risk and contagion. Journal of the European Economic Association3: 556–566.
23.
CoccoJFGomesFJMartinsNC (2009) Lending relationships in the interbank market. Journal of Financial Intermediation18: 24–48.
24.
Cohen-ColeEPatacchiniEZenouY (2015) Static and dynamic networks in interbank markets. Network Science3: 98–123.
25.
CorreaRGoldbergSLRiceT (2015) International banking and liquidity risk transmission: Evidence from the United States. IMF Economic Review63: 626–643.
26.
De VriesCG (2005) The simple economics of bank fragility. Journal of Banking & Finance29: 803–825.
27.
DenisDJ (2011) Financial flexibility and corporate liquidity. Journal of Corporate Finance17: 667–674.
28.
DiamondDWDybvigPH (1983) Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. Journal of Political Economy91: 401–419.
29.
ElliottMGolubBJacksonMO (2014) Financial networks and contagion. American Economic Review104: 3115–3153.
30.
FarhiETiroleJ (2012) Collective moral hazard, maturity mismatch, and systemic bailouts. American Economic Review102: 60–93.
31.
FreixasXParigiBMRochetJ-C (2000) Systemic risk, interbank relations, and liquidity provision by the central bank. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking32: 611–638.
GeorgC-P (2013) The effect of the interbank network structure on contagion and common shocks. Journal of Banking & Finance37: 2216–2228.
34.
GoderisBMarshIWVall-CastelloJet al. (2007) Bank behaviour with access to credit risk transfer markets. Bank of Finland Research Discussion Paper4, Bank of Finland, Helsinki.
35.
GraySMirkovicARagunathanV (2006) The determinants of credit ratings: Australian evidence. Australian Journal of Management31: 333–354.
36.
GuttmannRRodgersD (2015) International banking and liquidity risk transmission: Evidence from Australia. IMF Economic Review63: 411–425.
37.
HaleG (2012) Bank relationships, business cycles, and financial crises. Journal of International Economics88: 312–325.
HaleGKapanMTMinoiuMC (2016) Crisis transmission in the global banking network. IMF Working Paper, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, USA, 12April.
40.
HaselmannRWachtelP (2009) Syndicated loans, foreign banking and capital market development. Working Paper, Department of Economics, Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York City, NY, USA.
41.
IvashinaV (2009) Asymmetric information effects on loan spreads. Journal of Financial Economics92: 300–319.
42.
IvashinaVScharfsteinD (2010) Bank lending during the financial crisis of 2008. Journal of Financial Economics97: 319–338.
43.
KleibergenFPaapR (2006) Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition. Journal of Econometrics133: 97–126.
44.
KleinbergJM (1999) Authoritative sources in a hyperlinked environment. Journal of the ACM46: 604–632.
45.
LagunoffRSchreftSL (2001) A model of financial fragility. Journal of Economic Theory99: 220–264.
46.
ManolovaTSManevIMGyoshevBS (2014) Friends with money? Owner’s financial network and new venture internationalization in a transition economy. International Small Business Journal32: 944–966.
47.
MarkoseMSM (2012) Systemic risk from global financial derivatives: A network analysis of contagion and its mitigation with super-spreader tax. IMF Working Paper, International Monetary Fund, Washington, DC, USA, 30November.
48.
MayAD (2014) Corporate liquidity and the contingent nature of bank credit lines: Evidence on the costs and consequences of bank default. Journal of Corporate Finance29: 410–429.
49.
MendozaEGQuadriniV (2010) Financial globalization, financial crises and contagion. Journal of Monetary Economics57: 24–39.
50.
NikolaouK (2009) Liquidity (risk) concepts: Definitions and interactions. Working Paper 1008, European Central Bank, Frankfurt, 23February.
51.
OleaJLMPfluegerC (2013) A robust test for weak instruments. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics31: 358–369.
52.
PortesRReyH (2005) The determinants of cross-border equity flows. Journal of International Economics65: 269–296.
53.
RatnovskiL (2009) Bank liquidity regulation and the lender of last resort. Journal of Financial Intermediation18: 541–558.
WagnerW (2007) The liquidity of bank assets and banking stability. Journal of Banking & Finance31: 121–139.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
