This study investigates the governance attributes of firms that have been subject to securities class actions (SCAs). There has been a recent sizable increase in the number of firms subject to SCAs in Australia. We examine a sample of firms that have been subject to SCAs due to disclosure breaches and match the firms by industry and size to a control sample. First, we examine the compliance culture of the SCA firms via the frequency of Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) queries of the firm and find that the frequency of ASX queries is positively associated with the occurrence of a SCA. Secondly, we provide evidence that SCA firms exhibit weaker levels of corporate governance than the matched control sample. In addition, we contribute to the understanding of firms subject to SCAs and their corporate governance attributes. Our results suggest the presence of a nomination committee may be associated with higher agency costs and that the influence of CEO duality may reduce the effectiveness of a nomination committee.
AgrawalAJaffeJKarpoffJM (1999) Management turnover and governance changes following the revelation of fraud. Journal of Law & Economics42: 309–342.
2.
BeekesWBrownP (2006) Do better-governed Australian firms make more informative disclosures?Journal of Business Finance & Accounting33: 422–450.
3.
BorosE (2009) Public and private enforcement of disclosure breaches in Australia. The Journal of Corporate Law Studies9: 409–438.
4.
BrownPTarcaA (2007) Achieving high quality, comparable financial reporting: A review of independent enforcement bodies in Australia and the United Kingdom. Abacus43: 438–473.
5.
BrownPBeekesWVerhoevenP (2011) Corporate governance, accounting and finance: A review. Accounting and Finance51: 96–172.
6.
BrownPTaylorSLWalterTS (1999) The impact of statutory sanctions on the level and information content of voluntary corporate disclosure. Abacus35: 138–162.
7.
BurchEC (2007) Reassessing damages in securities fraud class actions. Maryland Law Review66: 348–397.
8.
CassidyAChappleL (2003) Australia’s corporate disclosure regime: Lessons from the US model. Australian Journal of Corporate Law15: 81–104.
9.
ChalmersKNaikerVNavissiF (2013) Earnings quality and Rule 10b-5 securities class action lawsuits. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy31: 22–43.
10.
ChanHWHFaffRHoYK. (2007) Management earnings forecasts in a continuous disclosure environment. Pacific Accounting Review19: 5–30.
11.
ChappleLTanD (2012) Corporate fraud and misconduct: Investigative and regulatory priorities. New Zealand Business Law Quarterly18: 70–92.
12.
ChenZCheungYLStouraitisA. (2005) Ownership concentration, firm performance, and dividend policy in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal13: 431–449.
13.
ChoiSJSilbermanL (2009) Transnational litigation and global securities class-action lawsuits. Wisconsin Law Review2009: 456–506.
14.
CotterJSilvesterM (2003) Board and monitoring committee independence. Abacus39: 211–232.
15.
CoxJDThomasRS (2009) Mapping the American shareholder litigation experience: A survey of empirical studies of the enforcement of the US Securities Law. European Company and Financial Law Review6: 164–203.
16.
Da Silva RosaRFilippettoJTarcaA (2008) Canaries for poor corporate governance?Accounting Research Journal21: 67–86.
17.
DrienkoJSaultS (2010) The impact of company responses to exchange queries on the Australian equity market. Accounting and Finance51: 923–945.
18.
DuffyM (2005) Fraud on the market: Judicial approaches to causation and loss from securities nondisclosure in the United States, Canada and Australia. Melbourne University Law Review29: 621.
19.
FieldLLowryMShuS (2005) Does disclosure deter or trigger litigation?Journal of Accounting & Economics39: 487–507.
20.
FoxMB (2009) Civil liability and mandatory disclosure. Columbia Law Review109: 237–308.
21.
FrancisJPhilbrickDSchipperK (1994) Shareholder litigation and corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting Research32: 137–164.
22.
GandeALewisCM (2009) Shareholder-initiated class action lawsuits: Shareholder wealth effects and industry spillovers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis44: 823–850.
23.
GargMNaikerVNavissiF (2012) Equity value implications of the SEC Exchange Act Rule 13a-14: A litigation cost perspective. Australian Journal of Management34: 77–98.
24.
GassmanGGranofP (2007) Global issues affecting securities claims at the beginning of the Twenty-First century. Tort Trial & Insurance Practice Law Journal43: 85–111.
25.
GongN (2007) Effectiveness and market reaction to the Stock Exchange’s inquiry in Australia. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting34: 1141–1168.
26.
GriffinPALontDHSegalB (2011) Enforcement and disclosure under regulation fair disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting and Finance51: 947–983.
27.
HermalinBEWeisbachMS (1988) The determinants of board composition. RAND Journal of Economics19: 589–606.
28.
HsuG (2009) Impact of earnings performance on price-sensitive disclosures under the Australian continuous disclosure regime. Accounting and Finance49: 317–339.
29.
Humphery-JennerM (2012) Internal and external discipline following securities class actions. Journal of Financial Intermediation21: 151–179.
30.
KarpoffJMLeeDSMartinGS (2008) The consequences to managers for financial misrepresentation. Journal of Financial Economics88: 193–215.
LinckJSNetterJMYangT (2008) The determinants of board structure. Journal of Financial Economics87: 308–328.
36.
LindgrenKE (ed.) (2009) Investor Class Actions (Ross Parsons Centre of Commercial, Corporate and Taxation Law). Sydney, NSW, Australia: University of Sydney
37.
McKnightPJWeirC (2009) Agency costs, corporate governance mechanisms and ownership structure in large UK publicly quoted companies: A panel data analysis. Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance49: 139–158.
38.
Mallesons Report (2012) Directions 2012: Current issues and challenges facing Australian directors and boards. Mallesons Stephen Jaques, Available at: http://www.mallesons.com/Documents/Directions_2012.pdf (accessed 10 November 2012).
39.
MarsdenAPoskittR (2009) An analysis of ASX price queries. Australian Accounting Review19: 217–230.
40.
MarsdenAPoskittRWangC (2008) An empirical analysis of the NZX’s price query system. Pacific Accounting Review20: 4–28.
NegaleA-MTsykinN (2001) Please explain: ASX share price queries and the Australian continuous disclosure regime. Melbourne: Centre for Corporate Law and Securities Regulation, University of Melbourne.
44.
NorthG (2010) A call for bold and effective corporate disclosure regulatory framework. Company and Securities Law Journal28: 331–356.
45.
PoskittR (2005) Disclosure regulation and information risk. Accounting and Finance45: 457–478.
46.
RogersJLVan BuskirkA (2009) Shareholder litigation and changes in disclosure behaviour. Journal of Accounting & Economics47: 136–156.
47.
RogersJLVan BuskirkAZechmanSLC (2011) Disclosure tone and shareholder litigation. Accounting Review86: 2155–2183.
48.
RuigrokWPeckSTachevaS. (2006) The determinants and effects of board nomination committees. Journal of Management & Governance10: 119–148.
49.
SchoarA (2002) Effects of corporate diversification on productivity. Journal of Finance57: 2379–2403.
50.
SchultzETanDTWalshKD (2010) Endogeneity and the corporate governance-performance relation. Australian Journal of Management35: 145–163.
51.
SeamerMPsarosJ (2009) Corporate governance as a facilitator of continuous market disclosure. In: Symposium Program, Newcastle upon Tyne. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1959.13/920193 (accessed 12 December 2010).
52.
ShleiferAVishneyRW (1986) Large shareholders and corporate control. Journal of Political Economy94: 461–488.
53.
ShleiferAVishneyRW (1997) A survey of corporate governance. Journal of Finance52: 737–783.
54.
SinghMDavidsonWN (2003) Agency cost, ownership structure and corporate governance mechanisms. Journal of Banking & Finance27: 793–816.
55.
SmithTMasonH (1979) Insider trading-A review of Australian and United States regulation. Accounting and Finance19: 52–70.
56.
SpenderP (2002) Securities class actions: A view from the land of the Great White shareholder. Common Law World Review31: 123–164.
57.
WayeV (2007) Conflicts of interests between claimholders, lawyers and litigation entrepreneurs. Bond Law Review19: Article 9.
58.
WelshM (2007) Enforcing contraventions of the continuous disclosure provisions: Civil or administrative penalties. Company and Securities Law Journal25: 315–334.
59.
WestphalJDZajacEJ (1995) Who shall govern? CEO/Board power, demographic similarity, and new director selection. Administrative Science Quarterly40: 60–83.
60.
XieBDavidsonWNDaDaltPJ (2003) Earnings management and corporate governance: The role of the board and the audit committee. Journal of Corporate Finance9: 295–316.
61.
YermackD (1996) Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics40: 185–211.
