This study examines if Australian target firm abnormal returns and characteristics differ between Australian and foreign bidders. The results indicate that takeovers from foreign bidders are associated with higher target firm abnormal returns than bids from Australian firms. Overseas bidders also pay an additional premium for research-intensive target firms. Target firms that receive an offer from outside Australia are significantly larger, have lower leverage, and are more likely to operate in the resources sector. Foreign acquisitions are also more likely to be a friendly takeover. The relative exchange rate is not associated with the likelihood of a foreign takeover. There is no difference in takeover success or competition between domestic and foreign bids.
Aw M. and Chatterjee R. ( 2004) The performance of UK firms acquiring large cross-border and domestic takeover targets. Applied Financial Economics14: 337-349.
2.
Baker M., Foley C. and Wurgler J. ( 2004) Multinationals as arbitrageurs: the effect of stock market valuations on foreign direct investment. Working paper, New York University.
3.
Bauguess S., Moeller S., Schlingemann F and Zutter C (2009) Ownership structure and target returns . Journal of Corporate Finance15: 48-65.
4.
Brown S. and Warner J. ( 1985) Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies. Journal of Financial Economics14: 3-31.
5.
Bugeja M. ( 2005) The effect of independent expert reports inAustralian takeovers. Accounting and Finance45: 519-536.
6.
Bugeja M. and Walter T. ( 1995) An empirical analysis of some determinants of the target shareholder premium in takeovers. Accounting and Finance35: 33-60.
7.
Cebenoyan A., Papaioannou G. and Travlos N. ( 1992) Foreign takeover wealth activity in the US and wealth effects for target firm shareholders. Financial Management21: 58-68.
8.
Chen C. and Su R. ( 1997) Do cross-border acquisitions of US targets differ from US domestic takeover targets? Global Finance Journal8: 71-82.
9.
Conn R., Cosh A., Guest P. and Hughes A. ( 2005) The impact on UK acquirers of domestic, cross-border, public and private acquisitions. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting32: 815-870.
10.
Da SilvaRosa R., Izan H., Steinback A. and Walter T. ( 2000) The method of payment decision in Australian takeovers: an investigation of causes and consequences. Australian Journal of Management25: 67-94.
11.
Draper P. and Paudyal K. ( 1999) Corporate takeovers: mode of payment, returns and trading activity. Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting26: 521-558.
12.
Finn F. and Hodgson A. ( 2005) Takeover activity in Australia: endogenous and exogenous influences. Accounting and Finance45: 375-394.
13.
Firth B. ( 2009) FIRB flouting investment law. The Australian , 6 October, p.22.
14.
Franks J., Harris R. and Mayer C. ( 1988) Means of payment in takeovers: results in the United Kingdom and the United States. In: Auerbach AJ (ed.) Corporate Takeovers: Causes and Consequences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, 221-264.
15.
Franks J., Harris R. and Titman S. ( 1991) The postmerger share-price performance of acquiring firms . Journal of Financial Economics29: 81-96.
16.
Froot K. and Stein J. ( 1991) Exchange rates and foreign direct investment: An imperfect capital markets approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics106: 1191-1217.
17.
Gujarati D. ( 1995) Basic Econometrics. 3rd ed. Sydney: McGraw-Hill.
18.
Harford J. ( 2005) What drives merger waves? Journal of Financial Economics77: 529-560.
19.
Harris R. and Ravenscraft D. ( 1991) The role of acquisitions in foreign direct investment: Evidence from the US stock market. Journal of Finance46: 825-844.
20.
Henry D. ( 2004) Corporate governance and ownership structure of target companies and the outcome of takeovers. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal12: 419-444.
21.
Hodgkinson L. and Partington G. ( 2008) The motivation for takeovers in the UK. Journal of Business , Finance and Accounting35: 102-126.
22.
Huang Y. and Walkling R. ( 1987) Target abnormal returns associated with acquisition announcements: payment acquisition form, and managerial resistance. Journal of Financial Economics19: 329-349.
23.
Kirchner S. ( 2009) Canberra’s Investment Confusion. The Asian Wall Street Journal, 30 September, p.13.
24.
Maheswaran K. and Pinder S. ( 2005) Australian evidence on the determinants and impact of takeover resistance. Accounting and Finance45: 613-633.
25.
Marriner C. ( 2009) ‘Racist’ FIRB a handbrake on growth, says miner. The Age, 30 September, p.1.
26.
Masse I., Hanrahan R. and Kushner J. ( 1991) The effect of the method of payment on stock returns in Canadian tender offers and merger proposals for both target and bidding firms . Quarterly Journal of Business29: 102-124.
27.
Moeller S. and Schlingemann F. ( 2005) Global diversification and bidder gains: a comparison between cross-border and domestic acquisitions. Journal of Banking and Finance29: 533-564.
28.
Pepper C. ( 2009) Nick Xenophon hits out at Rio Tinto sale. Adelaide Now, 9 May. Available at: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/mr-x-hits-out-at-rio-tinto-sale/story-e6freo8c-1225710562261 .
29.
Rhodes-Kropf M. and Viswanathan S. ( 2004) Market valuation and merger waves. Journal of Finance59: 2685-2718.
30.
Shaked I., Michel A. and McClain D. ( 1991) The foreign acquirer bonanza: myth or reality, Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting18: 431-447.
31.
Smith R. and Kim J. ( 1994) The combined effects of free cash flow and financial slack on bidder and target stock returns. Journal of Business67: 281-310.
32.
Stulz R. ( 1988) Managerial control of voting rights: financing policies and the market for corporate control. Journal of Financial Economics20: 25-54.
33.
Stulz R., Walkling R. and Song M. ( 1990) The distribution of target ownership and the division of gains in successful takeovers. Journal of Finance45: 817-833.
34.
Wansley J., Lane W. and Yang H. ( 1983) Abnormal returns to acquired firms by type of acquisition and method of payment. Financial Management12: 16-22.
