Are Vice-Chancellors and CEOs remunerated on the same basis? We analyse data from university annual reports on Vice Chancellors' remuneration over 1995–2002 and test whether there is alignment between the market for Vice-Chancellors and CEOs in Australia by investigating the relationship between remuneration and size between universities and companies. We find that the responsiveness of pay to institution size is dissimilar, with Vice-Chancellors receiving on average about 56% less than CEOs. We also compare the demographic profile of Vice-Chancellors against CEOs, showing that relative to CEOs, Vice-Chancellors are appointed later in life but do not have shorter tenures.
Associated Press, 2004, ‘Top pay for college presidents up again’, CNN.com, November 15.
3.
Australian Accounting Research Foundation, 1993, AAS 22: Related Party Disclosures, Australian Accounting Standard 22, issued on behalf of the Australian Society of Certified Practicing Accountants and The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia.
4.
Australian Accounting Standards Board, 1997, AASB 1017: Related Party Disclosures, Accounting Standard 1017, Australian Accounting Standards Board, Melbourne.
5.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2004a, Australian System of National Accounts 2002–03, Catalogue 5204.0, table 1, Gross Domestic Product and Associated Statistics.
6.
Australian Bureau of Statistics, 2004b, Australian System of National Accounts 2002–03, Catalogue 5204.0, table 61, Agricultural Income, current prices.
7.
Baimbridge, M., & Simpson, C.1996, ‘Rewards to academia: The remuneration of Vice-Chancellors and Principals’, Applied Economics, vol. 28, pp. 631–39.
8.
Becker, G.1962, ‘Investment in human capital: A theoretical analysis’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 70, pp. 9–49.
9.
Becker, G.1964, Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education, Columbia University Press, New York.
10.
Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S.2000, ‘Agents with and without Principals’, American Economic Review, vol. 90, pp. 203–08.
11.
Booz Allen Hamilton and Business Council of Australia, 2003, CEO Turnover in 2002: Trends, Causes and Lessons Learned.
12.
Boulanger, K., & Pliskin, J.1999, ‘Determinants of compensation of college Presidents’, working paper, Hamilton College, Clinton, NY.
13.
Business Council of Australia, 2004, ‘Executive remuneration’, position paper.
14.
Calabu, H., Kenyon, P. & Koshy, P. 2000, ‘Of dollars and cents—Valuing the economic contribution of Universities to the Australian economy’, Business/Higher Education Round Table Report, Melbourne, August 2000.
15.
Clements, K. W. 2002, ‘Comments on Rachel Merhebi: Australian CEO remuneration: A nonanomaly in the global market’, PhD Conference in Economics and Business, Australian National University, Canberra, 6–8 November.
16.
Cooper, D. 2004, ‘Uni in turmoil as head rolls’, The Australian, 10 April.
17.
Cornell, B.2004, ‘Compensation and recruiting: Private universities versus private corporations’, Journal of Corporate Finance, vol. 10, January, pp. 37–52.
18.
Coupé, T.2001, ‘Academics: On the salaries of United Kingdom Vice-Chancellors and Principals’, working paper, EERC, National University, Kyiv-Mohyla Academy.
19.
Crewther, R. 2003, ‘Submission to Senate Employment, Workplace Relations and Education References Committee Inquiry into Higher Education Funding and Regulatory Legislation’, Submission 442, Parliament of Australia Senate.
20.
Department of Education, Science and Training, 2004, ‘Finance 2003: Selected higher education statistics’, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
21.
Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs (DETYA), 2000, ‘Guidelines for the preparation of annual financial reports for the 2000 reporting period by Australian higher education institutions,’Higher Education Division, Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs, Canberra.
22.
Ehrenberg, R., Cheslock, J. & Epifantseva, J.2001, ‘Paying our Presidents: What do trustees value?’, Review of Higher Education, vol. 25, pp. 15–37.
23.
Lieu, D. 2003, ‘Australia's participation in the global market for CEOs’, Honours dissertation, Bachelor of Commerce, University of Western Australia.
24.
Marginson, S., & Considine, M.2000, The Enterprise University: Power, Governance and Reinvention in Australia, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
25.
Maslen, G.2006, ‘$1m Vice-Chancellor on the way’, Australian Financial Review, p. 29, 1 May.
26.
Medoff, J. L., & Abraham, K. G.1980, ‘Experience, performance and earnings’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 95, pp. 703–36.
27.
Medoff, J. L., & Abraham, K. G.1981, ‘Are those paid more really more productive? The case of experience’, Journal of Human Resources, vol. 16, pp. 186–216.
28.
Mellish, M.2004, ‘Disclosure earns directors more’, Australian Financial Review, 20 September, p 6.
29.
Merhebi, R., Swan, P. & Zhou, X.2003, ‘Australian CEO remuneration: A non-anomaly in the global market’, paper presented at the School of Banking and Finance Seminar Program, University of New South Wales, September 2003.
30.
Micheli, C. de & Herd, M. eds. 2003, Who's Who in Australia 2003, 39th edition, Crown Content, Melbourne.
31.
Mincer, J.1970, ‘The distribution of labour incomes: A survey’, Journal of Economic Literature, vol. 8, pp. 1–26.
32.
Mincer, J.1974, Schooling, Experience and EarningsColumbia University Press, New York.
33.
Monash University, 2002, ‘Council to meet on new VC for Monash’, Monash Newsline, 16 July.
34.
Morris, S.2004, ‘ANU hits the road in search of new funds’, Australian Financial Review, p. 3, 21 September.
35.
Murphy, K. J.1999, ‘Executive compensation’, in Handbook of Labour Economics, vol. 3, eds. O. Ashenfelter & D. Card, Elsevier Science B. V., Princeton, N.J.
36.
Oliver, S. 2004, ‘Personal communications’.
37.
Pfeffer, J., & Ross, J.1988, ‘The compensation of college and university Presidents’, Research in Higher Education, vol. 29, no. 1, 79–91.
38.
Roomkin, M. J., & Weisbrod, B. A.1999, ‘Managerial compensation and incentives in for-profit and nonprofit hospitals’, Journal of Law, Economics and Organisation, vol. 15, no. 3, 750–81.
39.
Sargeant, B. 2001, Hansard, Canberra Australia, Senate Employment, Workplace Relations, Small Business and Education Reference Committee 2001, Debates, 13 August, p. 1270.
40.
Soh, L. H. C. 2004, ‘How different are universities from companies? Financial reporting perspectives and the market for Vice-Chancellors’, Honours Dissertation, Bachelor of Commerce, University of Western Australia.
41.
Sorokina, O. V.2003, ‘Executive compensation: The case of liberal arts college Presidents’Issues in Political Economy, vol. 12, August, pp.1–16.
42.
Summers, L. H.2003, ‘The authority of ideas’Harvard Business Review, vol. 81, no. 8. p. 144.
43.
Swan, P.2001, ‘Vice-Chancellors' pay package is modest, relatively speaking’, Sydney Morning Herald, June 9.
44.
Tomazin, F., & Guy, R.2003, ‘Dunkin given six months’, The Age, June 5.
45.
Trewin, D. 2004, 2004 Year Book Australia. Number 86, Australian Bureau of Statistics. ABS Catalogue No. 1301.0, Commonwealth of Australia, Canberra.
