The paper investigates issues of scale equivalence and generalisability across different populations. This area of research is important because it allows for valid comparisons to be made when studies investigate the same constructs across qualitatively distinct populations. The study investigates the generalisability of the Narver and Slater (1990) and the Kholi, Jaworski and Kumar (1993) models of market orientation. Results indicate that the Narver and Slater model of market orientation is understood equivalently across different populations (i.e. it is more generalisable). Thus, on the basis of our results, researchers undertaking cross‐cultural, cross‐country, cross‐group or cross‐industry comparisons of market orientation would choose the Narver and Slater approach.
Abe, S., Bagozzi, R. & Sadarangani, P.1996, An investigation of construct validity and generalizability of the selfconcept: Selfconsciousness in Japan and the United States, Journal of International Consumer Marketing, vol. 8, no. 3–4, pp. 97–123.
2.
Bagozzi, R.P. & Heatherton, F.F.1994, A general approach to representing multifacated personality constructs: Application to state selfesteem, Structural Equation Modelling, vol. 1, pp. 35–67.
3.
Bentler, P.W.1990, Comparative fit indices in structural models, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 107, pp. 238–46.
4.
Bentler, P.W. & Bonett, D.G.1980, Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 88, pp. 588–606.
5.
Bentler, P.W. & Chou, C.1988, ‘Practical issues in structural modelling’, in Common Problems/Proper Solutions: Avoiding Error in Quantitative Research, ed J.S. Long, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 161–92.
6.
Browne, M.W.1990, MUTMUM PC: Users Guide, Ohio State University, Department of Psychology, Columbus.
7.
Browne, M.W. & Cudeck, R.1993, ‘Alternative ways of assessing model fit’, in Testing Structural Equation Models, eds K.A. Bollen & J.S. Long, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 136–62.
8.
Byrne, B.M.1994, Testing for the factorial validity, replication, and invariance of a measuring instrument: A paradigmatic application based on the Maslach burnout inventory, Multivariate Behavioural Research, vol. 29, pp. 289–311.
9.
Byrne, B.M. & Shavelson, R.J.1987, Adolescent selfconcept: Testing the assumption of equivalent structure across gender, American Educational Research Journal, vol. 24, pp. 365–85.
10.
Byrne, B.M., Shavelson, R.J. & Muthon, B.1989, Testing for the equivalence of factor covariance and mean structures: The issue of partial measurement invariance, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 105, pp. 456–66.
11.
Cole, D.A. & Maxwell, S.E.1985, Multitraitmultimethod comparisons across populations: A confirmatory factor analytic approach, Multivariate Behavioural Research, vol. 20, pp. 389–417.
12.
Deng, S. & Dart, J.1994, Measuring market orientation: A multifactor, multiitem approach, Journal of Marketing Management, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 725–42.
13.
Deshpande, R. & Farley, J.U.1998, Measuring market orientation: Generalisation synthesis, Journal of Market Focused Management, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 213–32.
14.
Deshpande, R., Farley, J.U. & Webster, F.1993, Corporate culture, customer orientation and innovation in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis, Journal of Marketing, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 3–37.
15.
Drasgow, E. & Kanfer, R.1985, Equivalence of psychological measurement in heterogeneous populations, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 70, pp. 662–80.
16.
Drasgow, F.1987, Study of the measurement bias of two standardised psychological tests, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 72, pp. 19–29.
17.
Frederiksen, N.1987, ‘How to tell if a test measures the same thing in different cultures’, in Basic Problems in Cross Cultural Psychology, ed Y.H. Poortinga, Swets & Zeitlinger, Amsterdamn pp. 14–18.
18.
Gray, B., Matear, S., Boshoff, C. & Matheson, P.1998, Developing a better measure of market orientation, European Journal of Marketing, vol. 32, no. 9–10, pp. 884–903.
19.
Greenley, G.1995, Market orientation and company perfor Mance: Empirical evidence from UK companies, British Journal of Management, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–13.
20.
Horn, J.L., McArdle, J. & Mason, R.1983, When is invariance not invariant: A practical scientist's look at the ethereal concept of factor invariance, Southern Psychologist, vol. 4, pp. 179–88.
21.
Hull, J.G., Lehn, D.A. & Tedlie, J.C.1991, A general approach to representing multifacated personality constructs, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 61, pp. 932–45.
22.
Jaworski, B. & Kohli, A.1993, Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences, Journal of Marketing, vol. 57, July, pp. 53–70.
23.
Joreskog, K.G. & Sorbom, D.1989, LISREL7: A Guide to the Program and Application, Scientific Software International, Chicago, 2nd edition.
24.
Kishton, J.M. & Widaman, K.F.1994, Unidimeninal vs domain representative parcelling of questionnaire items: An empirical example, Educational and Psychological Measurement, vol. 54, pp. 757–65.
25.
Kohli, A. & Jaworski, B.1990, Market orientation: The construct, research propositions, and managerial implications, Journal of Marketing, vol. 54, April, pp. 1–18.
26.
Kohli, A., Jaworski, B. & Kumar, A.1993, MARKOR: A measure of market orientation, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 30, November, pp. 467–77.
27.
Labouvie, E.W.1980, ‘Identity versus equivalence of psychological measures and constructs’, in Ageing in the 1980s, ed L.W. Poon, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC, pp. 493–502.
28.
Marsh, H.W., Balla, J.R. & McDonald, R.P.1988, Goodnessoffit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 103, pp. 391–410.
29.
Marsh, H.W.1994, Confirmatory factor analysis models of factorial invariance: A multifaceted approach, Structural Equation Modelling, vol. 1, pp. 5–34.
30.
Marsh, H.W. & Hocevar, D.1985, Application of confirmatory analysis to the study of self concept: First8 and higherorder factor models and their invariance across groups, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 97, pp. 562–82.
31.
Mavondo, F.T.1999, Market orientation: Scale invariance and relationship to generic strategies across two countries, Journal of Market Focussed Management, vol. 4, pp. 125–42.
32.
McArdle, J. & Nesselroade, J.R.1994, ‘Using multivariate data to structure developmental change’, in Lifespan Developmental Psychology: Methodological Contributions, eds S.H. Cohen & H.W. Reese, Eribaum, Hillsdale, NJ, pp. 223–67.
33.
McDonald, R.R. & Marsh, H.W.1990, Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 107, pp. 247–55.
34.
Meredith, W.1993, Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance, Psychometrika, vol. 58, pp. 525–43.
35.
Millsap, R.E. & Everson, H.1991, Confirmatory measurement model comparison using latent means, Multivariate Behavioural Research, vol. 26, pp. 479–97.
36.
Millsap, R.E. & Hartog, S.B.1988, Alpha, beta and gamma changes in evaluation research: A structural equation approach, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 73, pp. 574–84.
37.
Narver, J.C. & Slater, S.F.1990, The effect of a market orientation on business profitability, Journal of Marketing, vol. 54, October, pp. 20–35.
38.
Pelham, A. & Wilson, D.1996, A longitudinal study of the impact of market structure, firm structure, strategy, and market orientation culture on dimensions of smallfirm perfor Mance, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 27–43.
39.
Reise, S.P., Widaman, K.E. & Pugh, R.H.1993, Confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory: Two approaches for exploring measurement invariance, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 114, pp. 552–66.
40.
Riordan, C.M. & Vamderberg, R.J.‘A central question in crosscultural research: Do employees of different cultures interpret workrelated measures in an equivalent manner?’Journal of Management, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 643–71.
41.
Ruekert, R.W.1992, Developing a marketing orientation: An organization strategy perspective, International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 9 no. 3, pp. 225–45.
42.
Russell, D.W., Kahn, J.H., Spoth, R. & Altmaier, E.M.1998, Analysing data from experimental studies: A latent variable structural equation modelling approach, Journal of Counselling Psychology, vol. 45, no. 1, pp. 18–29.
43.
Sorbom, D.1974, A general method for studying differences in factor means and factor structure between groups, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, vol. 27, pp. 229–39.
44.
Steiger, J.H. & Lind, L.C1980, ‘Statistically based tests for the number of common factors’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, LA.
45.
Steiger, J.H., Shapiro, A. & Browne, M.W.1985, On the multivariate asymptotic distribution of sequential chisquare statistics, Psychometrika, vol. 50, pp. 253–64.
46.
Takahashi, T. & Nasser, F.1996, ‘The impact of using item parcels on ad hoc goodness of fit indices in confirmatory factor analysis: An empirical example’, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
47.
Tucker, L.R. & Lewis, C.1973, A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis, Psychometrika, vol. 38, pp. 1–10.
48.
Widaman, K.F. & Reise, S.P.1997. ‘Exploring the measurement invariance of psychological instruments: Application in substance use domain’, in The Science of Prevention: Methodological Advances from Alcohol and Substance Abuse Research, eds B.J. Kendall, M.T. Windle, & S.G. West, American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.
49.
Wren, B.1997, The market orientation construct: measurement and scaling issues, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 31–54.
