Although progress has been made in understanding the development of businesses competencies from a theoretical perspective, relatively few empirical studies have addressed the capabilities needed to become market‐driven and the perfor Mance advantages accruing to firms possessing these capabilities. One of the barriers faced has been in defining what is meant by the term ‘market‐driven’. This study develops a multi‐dimensional measure useful for assessing the degree to which a firm is market‐driven. Evidence is presented in this study that strategically focused market‐driven business units developed higher levels of capabilities than their less market‐driven rivals and significantly outperfor Med these rival business units on four measures of organisational perfor Mance.
Aaker, D.A.1994, Strategic Market Management, John Wiley and Sons, New York.
2.
Adler, P.S., Mandelbaum, A., Nguyen, V. & Schwerer, E.1996, ‘Getting the most out of your product development process’, Harvard Business Review, March, pp. 134–51.
3.
Anderson, J.C. & Gerbing, D.W.1988, Structural equation modelling in proactive: A review and recommended twostep approach, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 103, no. 3, pp. 411–23.
4.
Barney, J.B.1991, Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage, Journal of Management, vol. 17, March, pp. 99–120.
5.
Bentler, P.M.1990, Comparative fit indexes in structural models, Psychological Bulletin, vol. 107, no. 2, pp. 238–46.
6.
Bharadwaj, S.G., Varadarajan, P.R. & Fahy, J.1993, Sustainable competitive advantage in service industries: A conceptual model and research propositions, Journal of Marketing, vol. 57, October, pp. 83–99.
7.
Churchill, G.A.1979, ‘A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs’, Journal of Marketing Research; vol. 16, February, pp. 64–73.
8.
Day, G.S.1990, Market Driven Strategy, Processes for Creating Value, The Free Press, New York.
9.
Day, G.S.1993, ‘The capabilities of marketdriven organisations’, Marketing Science Institute, pp. 93–123.
10.
Day, G.S.1994, The capabilities of marketdriven organisations, Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, October, pp. 37–51.
11.
Day, G.S. & Wensley. R. 1988, Assessing advantage: A framework for diagnosing competitive superiority, Journal of Marketing, vol. 52, April, pp. 1–20.
12.
Deshpande, R., Farley, J.U. & Webster, F.E.1993, Corporate culture, customer orientation, and innovativeness in Japanese firms: A quadrad analysis, Journal of Marketing, vol. 57, January, pp. 23–7.
13.
Deshpande, R. & Webster, F.E. Jr. 1989, Organisational culture and marketing: Defining the research agenda, Journal of Marketing, vol. 53, January, pp. 3–15.
14.
Dess, G.G. & Davis, P.S.1984, Porter's (1980) generic strategies as determinants of strategic group membership and organisational perfor Mance, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 27, August, pp. 467–88.
15.
Doty, D.H., Glick, W.H. & Huber, G.P.1993, Fit, equifinality, and organisational effectiveness: A test of two configurational theories, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 30, December, pp. 1196–250.
16.
Grant, R.M.1991, ‘The resourcebased theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy for Mulation’, California Management Review, Spring, pp. 114–35.
17.
Grant, R.M.1996, Prospering in dynamicallycompetitive environments, organisational capability as knowledge integration, Organizational Science, vol. 7, pp. 375–87.
18.
Hall, R.1993, A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 607–18.
19.
Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K.1989, Strategic intent, Harvard Business Review, vol. 67, no. 3, pp. 63–76.
20.
Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K.1994, Competing for the Future, Harvard Business Press, Cambridge.
21.
Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. & Black, W.C.1995, Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings, MacMillan Publishing Company, New York.
22.
Hunt, S.D. & Morgan, R.M.1995, The comparative advantage theory of competition, Journal of Marketing, vol. 59, April, pp. 1–15.
23.
Jaworski, B.J. & Kohli, A.K.1993, Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences, Journal of Marketing, vol. 57, July, pp. 53–70.
24.
Johnson, G. & Scholes, K.1999, Exploring Corporate Strategy, Prentice Hall Europe, Hemel, Hempstead.
25.
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P.1992, ‘The balanced scorecard—Measures that drive perfor Mance’, Harvard Business Review, JanuaryFebruary, pp. 71–9.
26.
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P.1993, Putting the balanced scorecard to work, Harvard Business Review, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 134–47.
27.
Kaplan, R.S. & Norton, D.P.1996, Using the balanced scorecard as a strategic management system, Harvard Business Review, vol. 74, no. 1, pp. 75–85.
28.
Ketchen, D.J. & Shook, C.L.1996, The application of cluster analysis in strategic management research: An analysis and critique, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, June, pp. 441–58.
29.
Kohli, A.K. & Jaworski, B.J.1990, Market orientation: The construct, research propositions and managerial implications, Journal of Marketing, vol. 54, April, pp. 1–18.
30.
Kohli, A.K, Jaworski, B.J. & Kumar, A.1993‘MARKOR: A measure of market orientation’, Journal of Marketing Research, vol. 30, November, pp. 467–77.
31.
Miles, R.E. & Snow, C.C.1978, Organisational Strategy, Structure and Process, McGraw Hill, New York.
32.
Narver, J.C. & Slater, S.F.1990, The effect of a market orientation on business profitability, Journal of Marketing, vol. 54, October, pp. 20–35.
33.
Nunnally, J.C.1978, Psychometric Theory, McGraw Hill, New York.
34.
Oczkowski, E. & Farrell, M.A.1998‘An examination of the for M of market orientation in Australian companies’, Australian Marketing Journal, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 3–12.
35.
Porter, M.E.1980, Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analysing Industries and Competitors, The Free Press, New York.
36.
Prahalad C.K. & Hamel, G.1990, The core competence of the corporation, Harvard Business Review, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 79–91.
37.
Reichheld, F.F. & Sasser, W.E. Jr. 1990, ‘Zero defections: Quality comes to services’, Harvard Business Review, September, pp. 105–11.
38.
Ruekert, R.W., Walker, O.C. & Roering, K.J.1985, The organisation of marketing activities: A contingency theory of structure and perfor Mance, Journal of Marketing, vol. 49, Winter, pp. 13–25.
39.
Slater, S.F. & Narver, J.C.1994, ‘Does competitive environment moderate the market orientationperfor Mance relationship?’Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, January, pp. 46–55.
40.
Slater, S.F. & Narver, J.C.1995, Market orientation and the learning organisation, Journal of Marketing, vol. 59, July, pp. 63–74.
41.
Slater, S.F. & Narver, J.C.1998, Customer led and market oriented: Let's not confuse the two, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 19, no. 10, pp. 159–74.
42.
Sinkula, J.M.1994, Market infor Mation processing and organisational learning, Journal of Marketing, vol. 58, January, pp. 35–45.
43.
Varadarajan, P.1983, ‘Intensive growth opportunities: An extended classification’, California Management Review, vol. 25, Spring, pp. 118–32.
44.
Varadarajan, P. & Clark, T.1994, Delineating the scope of corporate, business, and marketing strategy, Journal of Business Research, vol. 31, pp. 93–105.
45.
Venkatraman, N.1989, Strategic orientation of business enterprises: The construct, dimensionality and measurement, Management Science, vol. 35, August, pp. 942–62.
46.
Venkatraman, N. & Ramanujam, V.1986, Measurement of business economic perfor Mance: A comparison of approaches, Academy of Management Review, vol. 11, pp. 801–14.
Wernerfelt, B.1984, A resourcebased view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 171–80.
49.
Woodruff, R.B.1997, Customer value: The next source for competitive advantage, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, vol. 25, Spring, pp. 139–53.
50.
Zahra, S.A. & Covin, J.G.1993, Business strategy, technological policy and firm perfor Mance, Strategic Management Journal, vol. 14, pp. 451–78.
