We research and document that the abnormal returns earned by Australian bidders and targets over the bid announcement period are not significantly associated with the proposed medium of exchange, i.e. cash or shares. However, over the long-term post-bid period, bidders who offer shares significantly under-perform regardless of bid outcome. Importantly, this result is after controlling for firm size, survival bias and method of return computation. Finally, the size of the target relative to the bidder firm and the variability of bidding firms' share price prior to the bid announcement are both positively associated with the probability of a share offer.
BarberB.M.LyonJ.D.1997, ‘Detecting long-run abnormal stock returns: The empirical power and specification of test statistics’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 43, pp. 341–72.
2.
BellamyD.E.LewinW.L.1992, ‘Corporate takeovers, method of payment, and bidding firms' shareholder returns: Australian evidence’, Asia Pacific Journal of Management, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 137–49.
3.
BishopS.DoddP.OfficerR.R.1986, Australian Takeovers: The Evidence, The Centre for Independent Studies, St Leonards, NSW.
4.
BlackburnV.L.DarkF.H.HansonR.C.1997, ‘Mergers, method of payment and returns to manager- and owner-controlled firms’, Financial Review, vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 569–89.
5.
BlumeM.StambaughR.F.1983, ‘Biases in computed returns: an application to the size effect’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 12, pp. 387–404.
6.
BrownD.T.RyngaertM.D.1991, ‘The mode of acquisition in takeovers: Taxes and asymmetric information’, Journal of Finance, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 653–69.
7.
BrownP.Da RosaR. Silva1998, ‘Research method and the long-run performance of acquiring firms’, Australian Journal of Management, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 23–38.
8.
BrownS.J.WarnerJ.B.1985, ‘Using daily stock returns: the case of event studies’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 14, pp. 3–31.
9.
BugejaM.WalterT.1995, ‘An empirical analysis of some determinants of the target shareholder premium in takeovers’, Accounting and Finance, vol. 35, pp. 33–60.
10.
CarletonW.T.GuilkeyD.K.HarrisR.S.StewartJ.F.1983, ‘An empirical analysis of the role of the medium of exchange in mergers’, Journal of Finance, vol. 38, pp. 813–26.
11.
DavidsonW.N.ChengL.T.W.1997, ‘Target firm returns: Does the form of payment affect abnormal returns?’, Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, vol. 23, pp. 465–79.
12.
DeakinE.B.1976, ‘Distributions of financial accounting ratios: Some empirical evidence’, Accounting Review, vol. 51, pp. 90–96.
13.
EckboB.E.GiammarinoR.M.HeinkelR.L.1990, ‘Asymmetric information and the medium of exchange in takeovers: Theory and tests’, Review of Financial Studies, vol, 3, pp. 651–75.
14.
EckboB.E.LangohrH.1989, ‘Information disclosure, methods of payment and takeover premiums: public and private tender offers in France’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 24, pp. 363–403.
15.
FamaE.1998, ‘Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 49, pp. 283–306.
16.
FishmanM.1989, ‘Preemptive bidding and the role of the medium of exchange in acquisitions’. Journal of Finance, vol. 44, pp. 41–57.
17.
FranksJ.R.HarrisR.S.MayerC.1988, ‘Means of payment in takeovers: Results for the United Kingdom and the United States’, in Corporate Takeovers, Causes and Consequences, (ed.) AuerbachA., University of Chicago Press, p. 221–58.
18.
GalaiD.MasulisR.1976, ‘The option pricing model and the risk factor of stock’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, pp. 53–81.
19.
Gresham Partners Ltd1996, ‘Scrip Takeover Offers Trends and Issues’, unpublished conference paper of the LCA Business Law Workshop, October 1996.
20.
HowJ.C.Y.IzanH.Y.MonroeG.S.1995, ‘Differential information and the underpricing of initial public offerings: Australian evidence’, Accounting and Finance, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 87–107.
21.
HansenR.G.1987, ‘A theory for the choice of exchange medium in mergers and acquisitions’, Journal of Business, vol. 60, pp. 75–95.
22.
HuangY.S.WalklingR.A.1987, ‘Target abnormal returns associated with acquisition announcements—payment, acquisitions form, and managerial resistance’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 19, pp. 329–49.
23.
JarrellG.A.BrickleyJ.A.NetterJ.M.1988, ‘The market for corporate control: The empirical evidence since 1980’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49–68.
24.
JensenM.1986, ‘Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance and takeovers’, American Economic Review, vol. 76, pp. 323–329.
25.
JensenM.C.RubackR.S.1983, ‘The market for corporate control: The scientific evidence’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 11, pp. 5–50.
26.
KothariS.P.WarnerJ.B.1997, ‘Measuring long-horizon security price performance’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 43, pp. 301–39.
27.
LelandH.PyleD.1977, ‘Information asymmetries, financial structure and financial intermediaries’. Journal of Finance, vol. 32, pp. 371–87.
28.
LoughranT.VijhA.M.1997, ‘Do long-term shareholders benefit from corporate acquisitions?’, Journal of Finance, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 1765–90.
29.
MartinK. J.1996, ‘The method of payment in corporate acquisitions, investment opportunities, and management ownership,’Journal of Finance, vol. 51, pp. 1227–1246.
30.
MyersS.MajlufN.1984, ‘Corporate Financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not’. Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 13, pp. 187–221.
31.
RollR.1983, ‘On computing mean returns and the small firm premium’, Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 12, pp. 371–86.
32.
TravlosN.G.1987, ‘Corporate takeover bids, methods of payment, and bidding firms' stock returns’, Journal of Finance, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 943–63.
33.
TravlosN.G.PapaioannouG.J.1991, ‘Corporate acquisitions: method of payment effects, capital structure effects, and bidding Firms' stock returns’, Quarterly Journal of Business, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 3–22.
34.
WalterT.1984, ‘Australian takeovers: Capital market efficiency and shareholder risk and return’, Australian Journal of Management, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 63–118.
35.
WansleyJ.W.LaneW.R.YangH.C.1983, ‘Abnormal returns to acquired firms by type of payment and method of payment’, Financial Management, vol. 12, pp. 16–22.
