This study investigated the incidence of and risk factors for central venous catheter (CVC) infection in intensive care. CVCs were prospectively studied in patients who had lines inserted in general or neurosurgical intensive care and were expected to have the line in situ for at least 72 hours. Catheters (n=119) were cultured for CVC-related infection (CRI; >15 colony forming units) and blood cultures done when indicated. CRI was identified in 32 (26.9%) catheters, CVC related bacteraemia in five cases (4.2%) and CVC related sepsis in none. After adjustment for duration of catheterization, independent predictors of CVC related infection were catheter insertion site, with jugular sites having the highest risk, and primary diagnosis, with neurosurgical patients at least risk.
PearsonM.L.Guideline for prevention of intravascular device-related infections. Part II. Recommendations for the prevention of nosocomial intravascular device-related infections. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Am J Infect Control1996; 24: 277–293.
2.
PinillaJ.C., RossD.F., MartinT., CrumpH.Study of the incidence of intravascular catheter infection and associated septicemia in critically ill patients. Crit Care Med1983; 11: 21–25.
3.
MakiD.G., StolzS.M., WheelerS., MermelL.A.Prevention of central venous catheter-related bloodstream infection by use of an antiseptic-impregnated catheter. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med1997; 127: 257–266.
4.
CollignonP.J.Intravascular catheter associated sepsis: a common problem. The Australian Study on Intravascular Catheter Associated Sepsis. Med J Aust1994; 161: 374–378.
5.
RichetH., HubertB., NitembergG.. Prospective multi-center study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter cultures in intensive care unit patients. J Clin Microbiol1990; 28: 2520–2525.
6.
MoroM.L., ViganoE.F., Cozzi LepriA.Risk factors for central venous catheter-related infections in surgical and intensive care units. The Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections Study Group. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol1994; 15: 253–264.
7.
Brun BuissonC., AbroukF., LegrandP., HuetY., LarabiS., RapinM.Diagnosis of central venous catheter-related sepsis. Critical level of quantitative tip cultures. Arch Intern Med1987; 147: 873–877.
8.
PragerR.L., SilvaJ.Jr.. Colonization of central venous catheters. South Med J1984; 77: 458–461.
9.
HoffmannK.K., WeberD.J., SamsaG.P., RutalaW.A.Transparent polyurethane film as an intravenous catheter dressing. A meta-analysis of the infection risks. JAMA1992; 267: 2072–2076.
10.
ConlyJ.M., GrievesK., PetersB.A prospective, randomized study comparing transparent and dry gauze dressings for central venous catheters. J Infect Dis1989; 159: 310–319.
11.
PowellC., ReganC., FabriP.J., RubergR.L.Evaluation of Opsite catheter dressings for parenteral nutrition: a prospective, randomized study. JPEN1982; 6: 43–46.
12.
MakiD.G., RingerM., AlvaradoC.J.Prospective randomised trial of povidone-iodine, alcohol, and chlorhexidine for prevention of infection associated with central venous and arterial catheters. Lancet1991; 338: 339–343.
13.
MakiD.G.Infections due to infusion therapy. In: BennetJ.V., BrachmanP.S., editors. Hospital Infections.Boston/Toronto: Little Brown & Co, 1986: 561–580.
14.
ReedC.R., SesslerC.N., GlauserF.L., PhelanB.A.Central venous catheter infections: concepts and controversies. Intensive Care Med1995; 21: 177–183.
15.
MakiD.G., WeiseC.E., SarafinH.W.A semiquantitative culture method for identifying intravenous-catheter-related infection. N Engl J Med1977; 296: 1305–1309.
16.
ZieglerE.J., FisherC.J.Jr., SprungC.L.. Treatment of gram-negative bacteremia and septic shock with HA-1A human-monoclonal antibody against endotoxin. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. The HA-1A Sepsis Study Group. N Engl J Med1991; 324: 429–436.
17.
SmithR.L., MeixlerS.M., SimberkoffM.S.Excess mortality in critically ill patients with nosocomial bloodstream infections. Chest1991; 100: 164–167.
18.
RicardP., MartinR., MarcouxJ.A.Protection of indwelling vascular catheters: incidence of bacterial contamination and catheter-related sepsis. Crit Care Med1985; 13: 541–543.
19.
ThorntonJ., ToddN.J., WebsterN.R.Central venous line sepsis in the intensive care unit. A study comparing antibiotic coated catheters with plain catheters. Anaesthesia1996; 51: 1018–1020.
20.
RyanD.W., GouldF.K.Central venous line sepsis [letter]. Anaesthesia1997; 52: 286–287.
21.
LooS., van HeerdenP.V., GollegeC.L., RobertsB.L., PowerB.M.Infection in central lines: antiseptic-impregnated vs standard non-impregnated catheters. Anaes Intens Care1997; 25: 637–639.
22.
CobbD.K., HighK.P., SawyerR.G.. A controlled trial of scheduled replacement of central venous and pulmonary-artery catheters. N Engl J Med1992; 327: 1062–1068.
