HollandR.Trends recognised in cases reported to the New South Wales Special Committee Investigating Deaths Under Anaesthesia. Anaesth Intens Care1987; 15: 97–98.
2.
HollandR.B.Hazards arising during trans-urethral resection of the prostate. General Scientific Meeting, Royal Australian College of Surgeons, Adelaide 1976.
SteibA., FreysG., BellerJ.P., CurzolaU., OtteniJ.C.Propofol in elderly high risk patients. A comparison of haemodynamic effects with thiopentone during induction of anaesthesia. Anaesthesia1988; 43 (suppl): 111–114.
5.
BusseJ., Von BulowS., KentgensA., HeidrichR.Comparison of propofol and isoflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia in ASA grade 3 and 4 patients. Anaesthesia1988; 43 (suppl): 121.
6.
McCleaneG.J., FogartyD.F., WattersC.H.Factors that influence the induction dose of propofol. Anaesthesia1991; 46: 59–61.
7.
PeacockJ.E., SpiersS.P.W., McLauchlanG.A.Infusion of propofol to identify smallest effective doses for induction of anaesthesia in young and elderly patients. Br J Anaesth1992; 69: 363–367.
8.
SebelP.S., LowdonJ.D.Propofol: a new intravenous anesthetic. Anesthesiology1989; 71: 260–277.
9.
PatrickM.R., BlairI.J., FeneckR.O., SebelP.S.A comparison of the haemodynamic effects of propofol (“Diprivan”) and thiopentone in patients with coronary artery disease. Postgrad Med J1985; 61 (Suppl 3): 23–27.
10.
HarrisC.E., MurrayA.M., AndersonJ.M.Effects of thiopentone, etomidate and propofol on the haemodynamic response to tracheal intubation. Anaesthesia1988; 43 (suppl): 32–36.
11.
LarsenR., RathgeberJ., BagdahnA.Effects of propofol on cardiovascular dynamics and coronary flow in geriatric patients: a comparison with etomidate. Anaesthesia1988; 43 (suppl): 25–31.
12.
ReichD.L., SilvayG.Ketamine: an update on the first twenty-five years of clinical experience. Can J Anaesth1989; 36: 186–197.
13.
PhilbinD.M., RosowC.E., SchneiderR.C., KoskiG., D'AmbraM.N.Fentanyl and sufentanil anesthesia revisited: how much is enough?Anesthesiology1990; 73: 5–11.
14.
PrianoL.L.Anesthetic Pharmacology. In: ThomasS.J., KramerJ.L. eds., Manual of Cardiac Anesthesia, 2nd Ed. Churchill Livingstone, New York1993; 299–314.
15.
RevesJ.G., FragenR.J., VinikH.R., GreenblattD.J.Midazolam: pharmacology and uses. Anesthesiology1985; 62: 310–324.
16.
GaussA., HeinrichH., Wilder-SmithO.H.G.Echocardiographic assessment of the haemodynamic effects of propofol: a comparison with etomidate and thiopentone. Anaesthesia1991; 46: 99–105.
17.
GoodingJ.M., WengJ-T, SmithR.A.Cardiovascular and pulmonary responses following etomidate induction of anesthesia in patients with demonstrated cardiac disease. Anesth Analg1979; 58: 40–41.
18.
KatesR.A., StackR.S., HillR.F.General anesthesia for patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty during acute myocardial infarction. Anesth Analg1986; 65: 815–818.
19.
CanessaR., LemaG., UrzuaJ.Anesthesia for elective cardioversion: a comparison of four anesthetic agents. J Cardiothor Vasc Anesthesia1991; 5: 566–568.
20.
WilliamsJ.P., McArthurJ.D., WalkerW.E., TeunissenE., RietsmaK., StanleyT.H.The cardiovascular effects of propofol in patients with impaired cardiac function. Anesth Analg1986; 65: S166.
21.
PriceM.L., MillarB., GroundsM., CashmanJ.Changes in cardiac index and estimated systemic vascular resistance during induction of anaesthesia with thiopentone, methohexitone, propofol and etomidate. Br J Anaesth1992; 69: 172–176.
22.
LedinghamI.M., WattI.Influence of sedation on mortality in critically ill multiple trauma patients. Lancet1983; 1: 1270.
23.
FragenR.J., WeissH.W., MolteniA.The effect of propofol on adrenocortical steroidgenesis—a comparative study with etomidate and thiopental. Anesthesiology1987; 66: 839–842.
24.
KenyonC.J., McNeilL.M., FraserR.Comparison of the effects of etomidate, thiopentone and propofol on Cortisol synthesis. Br J Anaesth1985; 57: 509–511.