We studied 30 children, aged 4 to 12 years, undergoing elective circumcision, premedicated with midazolam 0.5 mg.kg−1 and atropine 0.02 mg.kg−1 by mouth. A modified postbox test and the coding component of the Wechsler intelligence scale (WISC-R) was used to assess the preoperative effect of premedication on psychomotor function. Mood and sedation were also scored and related to serum midazolam concentrations. The children showed a significant decline in psychomotor performance 30 and 60 minutes after premedication when compared with their best unmedicated performance recorded the previous evening. This decline in psychomotor performance was only weakly associated with serum midazolam concentrations (r = 0.1). The postbox toy ratio is a suitable measurement of psychomotor performance in children because of its simplicity and ease of use in the clinical environment, although it may suffer the “test-retest” limitations of similar types of assessment. The sedative and anxiolytic effects of midazolam provide a quiet environment for a smooth induction of anaesthesia.
WhiteP.F.Pharmacologic and clinical aspects of preoperative medication. Anesth Analg1986; 65: 963–974.
2.
WesthorpeR.N.Paediatric day case anaesthesia. In: HealyT.E.J., ed. Anaesthesia for Day Case Surgery.London, Bailliere Tindall, 1990; 740–744.
3.
HannallahR.S., EpsteinB.S.Anesthesia for ambulatory surgery. In: WetchlerB.V., ed. Management of the Pediatric Patient.Philadelphia, J. B. Lippincott Company, 1991; 131–195.
McMillanC.O., Spahr-SchopferI.A., SikichN., HartleyE., LermanJ.Premedication of children with oral midazolam. Can J Anaesth1992; 39: 545–550.
6.
CraigJ., CooperG.M., SearJ.W.Recovery from day-case anaesthesia: comparison between methohexitone, althesin and etomidate. Br J Anaesth1982; 54: 447–451.
7.
The Hong Kong-Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children. In: HK-WISC Manual.Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Printing Department, 1981.
8.
KraneE.J., JacobsenL.E., LynnA.M., ParrotC., TylerD.C.Caudal morphine for postoperative analgesia in children: A comparison with caudal bupivacaine and intravenous morphine. Anesth Analg1987; 66: 647–653.
9.
RobertsonG.S., MacGregorD.M., JonesC.J.Evaluation of doxapram for arousal from general anaesthesia in outpatients. Br J Anaesth1977; 49: 133–139.
10.
JonesR.D.M., KapoorS.C., WarrenS.J., MoffatC., MerridewC.G., MacKillopA., HuiP.W.Effect of premedication on arterial blood gases prior to cardiac surgery. Anaesth Intens Care1990; 18: 15–21.
11.
VletterA.A., BurmA.G.L., BreimerL.T.M., SpierdijkJ.High-performance liquid chromatographic assay to determine midazolam and flumazenil simultaneously in human plasma. J Chromatography1990; 530: 177–185.
AmreinR., HetzelW., BonettiE.P., GereckeM.Clinical pharmacology of dormicum (midazolam) and anexate (flumazenil). Resuscitation1988; 16 (suppl): S5–S27.
14.
WeldonB.C., WatchaM.F., WhiteP.F.Oral midazolam in children: effect of time and adjunctive therapy. Anesth Analg1992; 75: 51–55.
15.
LauvenP.M., KulkaP.J.Anaesthesia techniques for midazolam and flumazenil—an overview. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1990; 34S: 84–89.
16.
NilssonA.Pharmacokinetics of benzodiazepines and their antagonists. In: WhiteP.F., eds. Kinetics of anaesthetic drugs in clinical anaesthesiology. Bailliere's Clinical Anaesthesiology. London, Bailliere Tindall1991; 615–634.
17.
ParnisS.J., FoateJ.A., van der WaltJ.H., ShortT., CroweC.E.Oral midazolam is an effective premedication for children having day-stay anaesthesia. Anaesth Intens Care1992; 20: 9–14.
18.
JonesR.D.M., LawsonA.D., AndrewL.J., GunawardeneW.M.S., Bacon-ShoneJ.Antagonism of the hypnotic effect of midazolam in children: a randomised, double-blind study of placebo and flumazenil administered after midazolam-induced anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth1991; 66: 660–666.
19.
JonesR.D.M., ChanK., RoulsonC.J., BrownA.G., SmithI.D., MyaG.H.Pharmacokinetics of flumazenil and midazolam in paediatric patients. Br J Anaesth1993; 70: 286–292.
20.
VetterT.R.A comparison of midazolam, diazepam, and placebo as oral anesthetic premedicants in younger children. J Clin Anesth1993; 5: 58–61.
21.
HindmarchI., BhattiJ.Z.Recovery of cognitive and psychomotor function following anaesthesia. A review. In: HindmarchI., JonesJ.G., MossE., eds. Aspects of recovery from anaesthesia.Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1987; 113–126.
22.
PayneK., MattheyseF.J., LiebenbergD., DawesT.The pharmacokinetics of midazolam in paediatric patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol1989; 37: 267–272.
23.
CashmanJ.N., PowerS.J.An evaluation of tests of psychomotor function in assessing recovery following a brief anaesthetic. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand1989; 33: 693–697.
24.
ChungF., LavelleP.A., McDonaldS., ChungA., McDonaldN.J.Cognitive impairment after neuroleptanalgesia in cataract surgery. Anesth Analg1989; 68: 614–618.
25.
AndersonS., McGuireR., McKeownD.Comparison of the cognitive effects of premedication with hyoscine and atropine. Br J Anaesth1985; 57: 169–173.
26.
RollasonW.N., RobertsonG.S., CordinerC.H., HallD.J.A comparison of mental function in relation to hypotensive and normotensive anaesthesia in the elderly. Br J Anaesth1971; 43: 561–565.
27.
SandersL.D.Recovery of psychological function after anaesthesia. In: LebowitzP.W., ed. Recovery from anaesthesia. International Anesthesiology Clinics. Boston: Little, Brown and company, 1991; 105–115.
28.
SchofieldNMcC, WhiteJ.B.Interrelations among children, parents, premedication, and anaesthetists in paediatric day stay surgery. Br Med J1989; 299: 1371–1375.
