Using the APACHE II scoring system, the risk of death was calculated for 189 patients in the Wanganui Intensive Care Unit and 194 patients in the Harare Intensive Care Unit. Using tables of actual and predicted outcome, the predictive power of the system was compared in patients grouped according to the length of time that they spent in the ICU. The predictive error increased from 15% in those patients staying less than six days, to 38% in those staying six days or more (P < 0.01). The predictive accuracy of the APACHE II system appeared to decrease with the length of time the patient stayed in the Intensive Care Unit.
LemeshowS., TeresD., PastidesH.A method for predicting survival and mortality of ICU patients using objectively derived weights. Crit Care Med1985; 13: 519–525.
2.
KnausW.A., DraperE.A., WagnerD.P., ZimmermanJ.E.APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med1985; 13: 818–829.
3.
JacobsS., ChangR.W.S., LeeB.One year's experience with the APACHE II severity of disease classification system in a general intensive care unit. Anaesthesia1987; 42: 738–744.
4.
SchaferJ-H, MaurerA., JochimsenF., EmdeC.Outcome preciction models on admission in a medical intensive care unit: Do they predict individual outcome?Crit Care Med1990; 18: 1111–1117.
5.
KnausW.A., ZimmermanJ.E.Prediction of outcome from critical illness. In: Recent Advances in Critical Care Medicine:McI LedinghamA. ed. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone1988: Ch1; p 1–13.
6.
CivettaJ.M.The clinical implications of ICU scoring systems. In: Problems in Critical Care: Prognostic scoring systems in ICU.FarmerJ.C., Ed. Philadelphia, JB Lippincott1989, p 681.
7.
MetzC.E.Basic principles of ROC analysis. Semin Nucl Med1978; 8: 283.
