Abstract
Forty Chinese women for elective caesarean section received either propofol 2 mg.kg−1 or thiopentone 4 mg.kg1 for induction of general anaesthesia. Systolic, mean and diastolic arterial pressures and heart rate were recorded non-invasively every minute for ten minutes. Post-induction arterial pressures were similar to pre-induction values with no differences between thiopentone and propofol. Following intubation, the rise in systolic arterial pressure was greater in the thiopentone group, 32.1 mmHg (SD 23.7) compared with the propofol group, 17.4 mmHg (SD 23.8), (P < 0.05). In the thiopentone group, arterial pressures were slower in returning to baseline values. Heart rate was initially elevated in both groups to the same degree. At caesarean section, induction with propofol causes less variation in arterial pressure than thiopentone. Hypotension is probably prevented by the coincident stimulus of rapid sequence induction. Neonatal Apgar scores were similar between the two groups.