A double-blind cross-over randomised study was performed to investigate whether Ro15-1788 (Anexate) adequately reversed the conscious sedation with midazolam so that patients were clinically recovered and fit for discharge quicker than when midazolam was used alone. Twenty-eight healthy patients between 18 and 34 years sedated with midazolam for bilateral 3rd molar surgery, one side being operated on at each visit. Ro15-1788 or normal saline (placebo) was given at the end of the surgical procedure at the first visit and the alternative at the second visit. Recovery with Ro15-1788 was significantly quicker than with the placebo, both by subjective (86%) and objective (93%) evaluation. Patients’ evaluation indicated that only 61% were more alert at home with Ro15-1788. Postoperative adverse effects were similar in both groups.
RodrigoMRC, ClarkRNW. A study of intravenous sedation with diazepam and midazolam for dentistry in Hong Kong Chinese. Anaesth Intens Care1986; 14:404–411.
4.
AunC, FlynnPJ, RichardsJ, MajorE.A comparison of midazolam and diazepam for intravenous sedation in dentistry. Anaesthesia1984; 39:589–593.
5.
DixonRA, KenyonC, MarshDRG, ThorntonJ.Midazolam in conservative dentistry — a cross-over trial. Anaesthesia1986; 41:276–281.
6.
WoodN, SheikhA.Midazolam and diazepam for minor oral surgery. Br Dent J1986; 160:9–12.
7.
HaefelyW.Pharmacology of benzodiazepine antagonists. Pharmacopsychiat1985; 18:163–166.
8.
Benzodiazepine antagonist Ro15-1788. Investigational drug brochure. Roche, Basle, Switzerland, June 1985.
9.
NilssonE, HimbergJJ. Physostigmine for postoperative somnolence after diazepam-nitrous oxide anaesthesia. Acta Anaesth Scand1982; 26:9–14.
10.
GarberJG, OminskyAT, OrkinFK. Physostigmine reversal of diazepam sedation. Anesthesiology1979; 51(S37):3.
11.
StirtJA. Aminophylline is a diazepam antagonist. Anaesth Analg1981; 60:767–768.
12.
ArvidssonS, NiemandD, MartinellS, Ekstrom-JodalB.Aminophylline reversal of diazepam sedation. Anaesthesia1984; 39:806–809.
13.
Scollo-LavizzariG.First clinical investigation of the benzodiazepine antagonist Ro15-1788 in comatose patients. Eur Neurol1983; 22:7–11.
14.
RapoldHJ, FollathF, ScolloG, RitzR.Diazepam: hazardous sedation of ventilated patients. Intens Care Med1983; 9:218.
15.
Martinez-AguirreE, NavarroT.Ro15-1788, a highly specific benzodiazepine antagonist: preliminary clinical experience. In: BoultonTB, ed. Sixth European Congress of Anaesthesiology abstracts. Academic Press, London, 1982; 422.
DionneRA. Differential pharmacology of drugs used for intravenous pre-medication. J Dent Res1984; 63:842–847.
18.
AlbumB, OlsenI, LokkenP.Bilateral surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar teeth as a model for drug evaluation: A test with oxyphenbutazone (Tanderil). Int J Oral Surg1977; 6:177–189.
19.
RodrigoMRC, RosenquistJB. Aminophylline fails to reverse conscious sedation with midazolam in dentistry. Anaes Prog1986; 33:152–155.
DixonRA, ThorntonJA. Tests of recovery from anaesthesia and sedation: intravenous diazepam in dentistry. Br J Anaes1973; 45:207–215.
22.
O'NeilR, VerrillPJ. Intravenous diazepam in minor oral surgery. Br J Oral Surg1969; 7:12–14.
23.
BenderL.Instruction manual for the Bender Motor Gestalt Test. American Orthopsychiatric Association1946.
24.
WylieWD. Report of the working party on training in dental anaesthesia, para. 8. Report of an interfaculty working party on training in dental anaesthesia. Royal College of Surgeons, England, October 1981.
25.
RevesJD, FragenRJ, VinikHR, GreenblattDJ. Midazolam: Pharmacology and uses. Anesthesiology1985; 62:310–324.
26.
LundgrenS, RosenquistJB. Comparison of sedation, amnesia and patient comfort produced by intravenous and rectal diazepam. J Oral Maxillofac Surg1984; 42:646–650.
