Our aim was to evaluate end-of-life practices in a tertiary intensive care unit in Saudi Arabia. A prospective observational study was conducted in the medical-surgical intensive care unit of a teaching hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Over the course of the one-year study period, 176 patients died and 77% of these deaths were preceded by end-of-life decisions. Of these, 66% made do-not-resuscitate decisions, 30% decided to withhold life support and 4% withdrew life support. These decisions were made after a median time of four days (Q1 to Q3: 1 to 9) and at least one day before death (Q1 to Q3: 1 to 4). The patients’ families or surrogates were informed for 88% of the decisions and all decisions were documented in the patients’ medical records. Despite religious and cultural values, more than three-quarters of the patients whose deaths were preceded by end-of-life decisions gave do-not-resuscitate decisions before death. These decisions should be made early in the patients’ stay in the intensive care unit.
CampbellM.L., GuzmanJ.A.Impact of a proactive approach to improve end-of-life care in a medical ICU. Chest2003; 123: 266–271.
2.
YazigiA., RiachiM., DabbarG.Withholding and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in a Lebanese intensive care unit: a prospective observational study. Intensive Care Med2005; 31: 562–567.
3.
Al-JahdaliH.H., BahroonS., BabgiY., TamimH., Al-GhamdiS.M., Al-SayyariA.A.Advance care planning preferences among dialysis patients and factors influencing their decisions. Saudi J Kidney Dis Transpl2009; 20: 232–239.
4.
SprungC.L., MaiaP., BulowH.H., RicouB., ArmaganidisA., BarasM.The importance of religious affiliation and culture on end-of-life decisions in European intensive care units. Intensive Care Med2007; 33: 1732–1739.
5.
PrendergastT.J., ClaessensM.T., LuceJ.M.A national survey of end-of-life care for critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med1998; 158: 1163–1167.
6.
da CostaD.E., GhazalH., Al KhusaibyS.Do Not Resuscitate orders and ethical decisions in a neonatal intensive care unit in a Muslim community. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed2002; 86: F115–119.
7.
BandiV., GuntupalliK.K.Limitation and withdrawal practice patterns in India. Crit Care Med2005; 33: 1436–1437.
8.
HeylandD.K., CookD.J., RockerG.M., DodekP.M., KutsogiannisD.J., SkrobikY.Defining priorities for improving end-of-life care in Canada. CMAJ2010; 182: 747–752.
9.
ManiR.K., MandalA.K., BalS., JaveriY., KumarR., NamaD.K.End-of-life decisions in an Indian intensive care unit. Intensive care medicine. Intensive Care Med2009; 35: 1713–1719.
10.
KnausW.A., DraperE.A., WagnerD.P., ZimmermanJ.E.APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med1985; 13: 818–829.
11.
CarletJ., ThijsL.G., AntonelliM., CassellJ., CoxP., HillN.Challenges in end-of-life care in the ICU. Statement of the 5th International Consensus Conference in Critical Care. Intensive Care Med2004; 30: 770–784.
12.
BarnettV.T., AuroraV.K.Physician beliefs and practice regarding end-of-life care in India. Indian J Crit Care Med2008; 12: 109–115.
13.
Faber-LangendoenK., LankenP.N.Dying patients in the intensive care unit: forgoing treatment, maintaining care. Ann Intern Med2000; 133: 886–893.
14.
OrrR.D.Withdrawing the critical but not the care. JAMA1994; 271: 1358–1361.
15.
IyilikçiL., ErbayraktarS., GökmenN., EllidokuzH., KaraH.C., GünerliA.Practices of anaesthesiologists with regard to withholding and withdrawal of life support from the critically ill in Turkey. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand2004; 48: 457–462.
16.
SprungC.L., CohenS.L., SjokvistP., BarasM., BulowH.H., HovilehtoS.End-of-life practices in European intensive care units: the Ethicus Study. JAMA2003; 290: 790–797.
17.
WunschH., HarrisonD.A., HarveyS., RowanK.End-of-life decisions: a cohort study of the withdrawal of all active treatment in intensive care units in the United Kingdom. Intensive Care Med2005; 31: 823–831.
18.
PrendergastT.J., LuceJ.M.Increasing incidence of withholding and withdrawal of life support from critically ill. Am J Respir Crit Care Med1997; 155: 15–20.
19.
WoodG.G., MartinE.Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy in a Canadian intensive care unit. Can J Anesth1995; 42: 186–191.
20.
TurnerJ.S., MichellW.L., MorganC.J., BenatarS.R.Limitation of life support: frequency and practice in a London and a Cape Town intensive care unit. Intensive Care Med1996; 22: 1020–1025.
21.
CurtisJ.R., VincentJ.L.Ethics and end-of-life care for adults in the intensive care unit. Lancet2010; 376: 1347–1353.
22.
FerrandE., RobertR., IngrandP., LemaireF; French LATAREA Group. Withholding and withdrawal of life support in intensive-care units in France: a prospective survey. Lancet2001; 357: 9–14.
23.
SpronkP.E., KuiperA.V., RommesJ.H., KorevaarJ.C., SchultzM.J.The practice of and documentation on withholding and withdrawing life support: a retrospective study in two Dutch intensive care units. Anesth Analg2009; 109: 841–846.
24.
Kim doY., LeeK.E., NamE.M., LeeH.R., LeeK.W., KimJ.H.Do-not-resuscitate orders for terminal patients with cancer in teaching hospitals of Korea. J Palliat Med2007; 10: 1153–1158.
25.
CookD.J., GuyattG.H., JaeschkeR., ReeveJ., SpanierA., KingD.Determinants in Canadian health care workers of the decision to withdraw life support from the critically ill. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. JAMA1995; 273: 703–708.
26.
KapadiaF., SinghM., DivatiaJ., VaidyanathanP., UdwadiaF.E., RaisinghaneyS.J.Limitation and withdrawal of intensive therapy at the end of life: practices in intensive care units in Mumbai, India. Crit Care Med2005; 33: 1272–1275.
