Airway complications are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in anaesthesia1. Effective management of a difficult airway requires the timely availability of suitable airway equipment. The Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists has recently developed guidelines for the minimum set of equipment needed for the effective management of an unexpected difficult airway (TG4 [2010] www.anzca.edu.au/resources/professionaldocuments). TG4 [2010] is based on expert consensus, underpinned by wide consultation and an extensive review of the available evidence, which is summarised in a Background Paper (TG4 BP [2010] www.anzca.edu.au/resources/professional-documents). TG4 [2010] will be reviewed at the end of one year and thereafter every five years or more frequently if necessary. The current paper is reproduced directly from the Background Paper (TG4 BP [2010]).
CaplanR.A., PosnerK.L., WardR.J., CheneyF.W.Adverse respiratory events in anesthesia: a closed claims analysis.Anesthesiology1990; 72: 828–833.
2.
Western Australia Record of Investigation into Death, Ref No: 24/03.
3.
Western Australia Record of Investigation into Death, Ref No; 12/07.
4.
WilliamsonJ.A., WebbR.K., SzekelyS., GilliesE.R., DreostiA.V.The Australian Incident Monitoring Study. Difficult intubation: an analysis of 2000 incident reports.Anaesth Intensive Care1993; 21: 602–607.
5.
WilliamsonJ., RuncimanB., HibbertP., BenvenisteK.AIMS Anaesthesia: a comparative analysis of the first 2,000 and the most recent 1,000 incident reports.The ANZCA Bulletin2008; 17: 13–15.
6.
PetersonG.N., DominoK.B., CaplanR.A., PosnerK.L., LeeL.A., CheneyF.W.Management of the difficult airway: a closed claims analysis.Anesthesiology2005; 103: 33–39.
7.
Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists. T1 (2008) Recommendations on Minimum Facilities for Safe Administration of Anaesthesia in Operating Room Suites and Other Anaesthetising Locations. From http://www.anzca.edu.au/resources/professional-documents/t1.html Accessed April 2010.
8.
HendersonJ.J., PopatM.T., LattoI.P., PearceA.C.Difficult Airway S: Difficult Airway Society guidelines for management of the unanticipated difficult intubation.Anaesthesia2004; 59: 675–694.
9.
Practise Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway.An Updated Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway.
10.
Boisson-BertrandD., BourgainJ.L., CamboulivesJ., CrinquetteV., CrosA.M., DubreuilM.Difficult intubation. French Society of Anesthesia and Intensive Care. A collective expertise.Ann Fr Anesth Reanim1996; 15: 207–214.
11.
CrosbyE.T., CooperR.M., DouglasM.J., DoyleD.J., HungO.R., LabrecqueP.The unanticipated difficult airway with recommendations for management.Can J Anesth1998; 45: 757–776.
12.
FrovaG.The difficult intubation and the problem of monitoring the adult airway. Italian Society of Anesthesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Therapy (SIAARTI).Minerva Anestesiol1998; 64: 361–371.
13.
PetriniF., AccorsiA., AdrarioE., AgroF., AmicucciG., AntonelliM.Recommendations for airway control and difficult airway management.Minerva Anestesiol2005; 71: 617–657.
14.
FrovaG., GuarinoA., PetriniF., MerliG., SorbelloM., BaronciniS.Recommendations for airway control and difficult airway management in paediatric patients.Minerva Anestesiol2006; 72: 723–748.
15.
BraunU., GoldmannK., HempelV., KrierC.Practice Guidelines for Airway Management of the German Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care.Anaesthesiologie Intensivmedizin, Schmerz-therapie2004; 45: 302–306.
16.
BakerP.A., HounsellG.L., FutterM.E., AndersonB.J.Airway management equipment in a metropolitan region: an audit.Anaesth Intensive Care2007; 35: 563–569.
ScottD.A., MerryA.F.Development of an “Equipment to Manage a Difficult Airway During Anaesthesia” professional document using a new evidence-based approach.Anaesth Intensive Care2010; 38: 11–12.
22.
GuyattG.H., OxmanA.D., VistG.E., KunzR., Falck-YtterY., Alonso-CoelloP.GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.BMJ2008; 336: 924–926.
23.
EngelhardtT., MortonN.S.New guidelines – a golden opportunity.Paediatr Anaesth2008; 18: 695–696.
24.
MihaiR., BlairE., KayH., CookT.M.A quantitative review and meta-analysis of performance of non-standard laryngoscopes and rigid fibreoptic intubation aids.Anaesthesia2008; 63: 745–760.
25.
KaplanM.B., HagbergC.A., WardD.S., BrambrinkA., ChhibberA.K., HeideggerT.Comparison of direct and video-assisted views of the larynx during routine intubation.J Clin Anesth2006; 18: 357–362.
26.
GreinA.J., WeinerG.M.Laryngeal mask airway versus bagmask ventilation or endotracheal intubation for neonatal resuscitation.Cochrane Database Syst Rev2005; CD003314.
27.
SmithG.C.S., PellJ.P.Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials.BMJ2003; 327: 1459–1461.
28.
GabaD.M., HowardS.K., FlanaganB., SmithB.E., FishK.J., BotneyR.Assessment of clinical performance during simulated crises using both technical and behavioral ratings.Anesthesiology1998; 89: 8–18.
AnnamaneniR., HodzovicI., WilkesA.R., LattoI.P.A comparison of simulated difficult intubation with multiple-use and single-use bougies in a manikin.Anaesthesia2003; 58: 45–49.
31.
TwiggS.J., McCormickB., CookT.M.Randomized evaluation of the performance of single-use laryngoscopes in simulated easy and difficult intubation.Br J Anaesth2003; 90: 8–13.
32.
WilkesA.R., HodzovicI., LattoI.P.Introducing new anaesthetic equipment into clinical practice.Anaesthesia2008; 63: 571–575.
33.
BirminghamP.K., CheneyF.W., WardR.J.Esophageal intubation: a review of detection techniques.Anesth Analg1986; 65: 886–891.
34.
Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway.A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway.
35.
FrovaG., SorbelloM.Algorithms for difficult airway management: a review.Minerva Anestesiol2009; 75: 201–209.
Practice guidelines for obstetrical anesthesia: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Obstetrical Anesthesia.Anesthesiology1999; 90: 600–611.
38.
KuczkowskiK.M., ReisnerL.S., BenumofJ.L.Airway problems and new solutions for the obstetric patient.J Clin Anesth2003; 15: 552–563.
39.
BrimacombeJ.A proposed classification system for extraglottic airway devices.Anesthesiology2004; 101: 559.
40.
MillerD.M.A proposed classification and scoring system for supraglottic sealing airways: a brief review.Anesth Analg2004; 99: 1553–1559.
ParmetJ.L., Colonna-RomanoP., HorrowJ.C., MillerF., GonzalesJ., RosenbergH.The laryngeal mask airway reliably provides rescue ventilation in cases of unanticipated difficult tracheal intubation along with difficult mask ventilation.Anesth Analg1998; 87: 661–665.
43.
CookT.M., BrooksT.S., Van der WesthuizenJ., ClarkeM.The Proseal LMA is a useful rescue device during failed rapid sequence intubation: two additional cases.Can J Anesth2005; 52: 630–633.
44.
SharmaB., SahaiC., SoodJ., KumraV.P.The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in two failed obstetric tracheal intubation scenarios.Int J Obstet Anesth2006; 15: 338–339.
45.
FersonD.Z., RosenblattW.H., JohansenM.J., OsbornI., OvassapianA.Use of the intubating LMA-Fastrach in 254 patients with difficult-to-manage airways.Anesthesiology2001; 95: 1175–1181.
46.
LevitanR.M., OchrochE.A., StuartS., HollanderJ.E.Use of the intubating laryngeal mask airway by medical and nonmedical personnel.Am J Emerg Med2000; 18: 12–16.
47.
ChadwickI.S., VohraA.Anaesthesia for emergency caesarean section using the brain laryngeal airway.Anaesthesia1989; 44: 261–262.
48.
BenumofJ.L.Laryngeal mask airway and the ASA difficult airway algorithm.Anesthesiology1996; 84: 686–699.
49.
2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.Part 7: Neonatal resuscitation.Resuscitation2005; 67: 293–303.
50.
HodzovicI., JanakiramanC., SudhirG., GoodwinN., WilkesA., LattoI.P.Fibreoptic intubation through the laryngeal mask airway: effect of operator experience.Anaesthesia2009; 64: 1066–1071.
51.
DimitriouV., VoyagisG.S., GrosomanidisV., BrimacombeJ.Feasibility of flexible lightwand-guided tracheal intubation with the intubating laryngeal mask during out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation by an emergency physician.Eur J Anaesthesiol2006; 23: 76–79.
52.
SteelA.The intubating laryngeal mask airway.Emerg Med J2005; 22: 47–49.
53.
RosenblattW.H., MurphyM.The intubating laryngeal mask: use of a new ventilating-intubating device in the emergency department.Ann Emerg Med1999; 33: 234–238.
54.
BurgoyneL., CynaA.Laryngeal mask vs intubating laryngeal mask: insertion and ventilation by inexperienced resuscitators.Anaesth Intensive Care2001; 29: 604–608.
55.
KomatsuR., NagataO., SesslerD.I., OzakiM.The intubating laryngeal mask airway facilitates tracheal intubation in the lateral position.Anesth Analg2004; 98: 858–861.
56.
FanK.H., HungO.R., AgroF.A comparative study of tracheal intubation using an intubating laryngeal mask (Fastrach) alone or together with a lightwand (Trachlight).J Clin Anesth2000; 12: 581–585.
57.
BerckerS., SchmidbauerW., VolkT., BoguschG., BubserH.P., HenselM.A comparison of seal in seven supraglottic airway devices using a cadaver model of elevated esophageal pressure.Anesth Analg2008; 106: 445–448.
TimmermannA., RussoS., GrafB.M.Evaluation of the CTrach – an intubating LMA with integrated fibreoptic system.Br J Anaesth2006; 96: 516–521.
60.
GoldmanA.J.The LMA CTrach: a prospective evaluation of 100 cases.Anesthesiology2006; 105: A521.
61.
LiuE.H., GoyR.W., ChenF.G.The LMA CTrach, a new laryngeal mask airway for endotracheal intubation under vision: evaluation in 100 patients.Br J Anaesth2006; 96: 396–400.
62.
BrainA.I., VergheseC., StrubeP.J.The LMA ‘ProSeal’ – a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent.Br J Anaesth2000; 84: 650–654.
63.
CookT.M., GibbisonB.Analysis of 1000 consecutive uses of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway by one anaesthetist at a district general hospital.Br J Anaesth2007; 99: 436–439.
64.
CookT.M., SellerC., GuptaK., ThorntonM., O'SullivanE.Non-conventional uses of the Aintree Intubating Catheter in management of the difficult airway.Anaesthesia2007; 62: 169–174.
65.
GreenlandK.B., TanH., EdwardsM.Intubation via a laryngeal mask airway with an Aintree catheter – not all laryngeal masks are the same.Anaesthesia2007; 62: 966–967.
66.
GoldmannK., RoettgerC., WulfH.The size 1(1/2) ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in infants: a randomized, crossover investigation with the Classic laryngeal mask airway.Anesth Analg2006; 102: 405–410.
67.
WheelerM.ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in 120 pediatric surgical patients: a prospective evaluation of characteristics and performance.Paediatr Anaesth2006; 16: 297–301.
68.
SuB.C., YangM.W., LeeH.C., ChangC.H., LinC.C.Protection against large-volume regurgitated fluid aspiration by the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan2008; 46: 34–38.
69.
StixM.S., O'ConnorCJJr.Depth of insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.Br J Anaesth2003; 90: 235–237.
70.
SandersJ.C., OlomuP.N., FurmanJ.R.Detection, frequency and prediction of problems in the use of the proseal laryngeal mask airway in children.Paediatr Anaesth2008; 18: 1183–1189.
71.
StixM.S., O'ConnorCJJr.Maximum minute ventilation test for the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.Anesth Analg2002; 95: 1782–1787.
72.
BrimacombeJ., RichardsonC., KellerC., DonaldS.Mechanical closure of the vocal cords with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.Br J Anaesth2002; 88: 296–297.
73.
GoldmannK., JakobC.A randomized crossover comparison of the size 2 1/2 laryngeal mask airway ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway-Classic in pediatric patients.Anesth Analg2005; 100: 1605–1610.
74.
MicaglioM., BonatoR., De NardinM., ParottoM., TrevisanutoD., ZanardoV.Prospective, randomized comparison of ProSeal and Classic laryngeal mask airways in anaesthetized neonates and infants.Br J Anaesth2009; 103: 263–267.
75.
GoldmannK.Recent developments in airway management of the paediatric patient.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol2006; 19: 278–284.
76.
JoshiN.A., BairdM., CookT.M.Use of an i-gel for airway rescue.Anaesthesia2008; 63: 1020–1021.
77.
TheilerL.G., Kleine-BrueggeneyM., KaiserD., UrwylerN., LuyetC., VogtA.Crossover comparison of the laryngeal mask supreme and the i-gel in simulated difficult airway scenario in anesthetized patients.Anesthesiology2009; 111: 55–62.
78.
CampbellJ., MichalekP., DeighanM.I-gel supraglottic airway for rescue airway management and as a conduit for tracheal intubation in a patient with acute respiratory failure.Resuscitation2009; 80: 963.
79.
MichalekP., HodgkinsonP., DonaldsonW.Fiberoptic intubation through an I-gel supraglottic airway in two patients with predicted difficult airway and intellectual disability.Anesth Analg2008; 106: 1501–1504.
80.
JagannathanN., RothA.G., SohnL.E., PakT.Y., AminS., SureshS.The new air-Q intubating laryngeal airway for tracheal intubation in children with anticipated difficult airway: a case series.Paediatr Anaesth2009; 19: 618–622.
81.
YangD., DengX.M., TongS.Y., LuoM.P., XuK.L., WeiY.K.Fibreoptic intubation through Cookgas intubating laryngeal airway in two children.Anaesthesia2009; 64: 1148–1149.
82.
BakkerE.J., ValkenburgM., GalvinE.M.Pilot study of the air-Q Intubating Laryngeal Airway in clinical use.Anaesth Intensive Care2010; 38: 346–348.
83.
MortT.C.Laryngeal mask airway and bougie intubation failures: the Combitube as a secondary rescue device for inhospital emergency airway management.Anesth Analg2006; 103: 1264–1266.
84.
RumballC.J., MacDonaldD.The PTL, Combitube, laryngeal mask, and oral airway: a randomized prehospital comparative study of ventilatory device effectiveness and cost-effectiveness in 470 cases of cardiorespiratory arrest.Prehosp Emerg Care1997; 1: 1–10.
85.
TanigawaK., ShigematsuA.Choice of airway devices for 12,020 cases of nontraumatic cardiac arrest in Japan.Prehosp Emerg Care1998; 2: 96–100.
86.
AgroF., FrassM., BenumofJ.L., KrafftP.Current status of the Combitube: a review of the literature.J Clin Anesth2002; 14: 307–314.
87.
McGlinchB.P., MartinD.P., VolcheckG.W., CarmichaelS.W.Tongue engorgement with prolonged use of the esophageal-tracheal Combitube.Ann Emerg Med2004; 44: 320–322.
88.
StoppacherR., TeggatzJ.R., JentzenJ.M.Esophageal and pharyngeal injuries associated with the use of the esophageal-tracheal Combitube.J Forensic Sci2004; 49: 586–591.
89.
UrtubiaR.M., FrassM., AgroF.New insertion technique of the Esophageal-Tracheal Combitube.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand2002; 46: 340–341.
90.
BolligG., LovhaugS.W., SagenO., SvendsenM.V., SteenP.A., WikL.Airway management by paramedics using endotracheal intubation with a laryngoscope versus the oesophageal tracheal Combitube and EasyTube on manikins: a randomised experimental trial.Resuscitation2006; 71: 107–111.
91.
Ulrich-PurH., HrskaF., KrafftP., FriehsH., WulkersdorferB., KostlerW.J.Comparison of mucosal pressures induced by cuffs of different airway devices.Anesthesiology2006; 104: 933–938.
92.
ThierbachA.R., WernerC.Infraglottic airway devices and techniques.Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol2005; 19: 595–609.
93.
ThierbachA.R., PiephoT., MaybauerM.The EasyTube for airway management in emergencies.Prehosp Emerg Care2005; 9: 445–448.
94.
ThierbachA.R., PiephoT., MaybauerM.O.A new device for emergency airway management: the EasyTube.Resuscitation2004; 60: 347.
95.
UrtubiaR.M., LeytonP.Successful use of the EasyTube for facial surgery in a patient with glottic and subglottic stenosis.J Clin Anesth2007; 19: 77–78.
96.
KheterpalS., MartinL., ShanksA.M., TremperK.K.Prediction and outcomes of impossible mask ventilation: a review of 50,000 anesthetics.Anesthesiology2009; 110: 891–897.
97.
McIntyreJ.W.Laryngoscope design and the difficult adult tracheal intubation.Can J Anesth1989; 36: 94–98.
98.
LevitanR.M., KellyJ.J., KinkleW.C., FasanoC.Light intensity of curved laryngoscope blades in Philadelphia emergency departments.Ann Emerg Med2007; 50: 253–257.
99.
AsaiT., MatsumotoS., FujiseK., JohmuraS., ShinguK.Comparison of two Macintosh laryngoscope blades in 300 patients.Br J Anaesth2003; 90: 457–460.
100.
BucxM.J., SnijdersC.J., ven der VegtM.H., HolsteinJ.D., StijnenT.Reshaping the Macintosh blade using biomechanical modelling. A prospective comparative study in patients.Anaesthesia1997; 52: 662–667.
101.
MacintoshR.A new laryngoscope.Lancet1943; 205.
102.
ZauderH.L.The Macintosh laryngoscope blade.Anesthesiology2005; 102: 241–242.
103.
TakenakaI., AoyamaK.Use of Macintosh laryngoscope No. 2 for adult patients with a short thyromental distance.Anesthesiology2007; 106: 403.
104.
TripathiM., PandeyM.Short thyromental distance: a predictor of difficult intubation or an indicator for small blade selection?Anesthesiology2006; 104: 1131–1136.
105.
CookT.M., TuckeyJ.P.A comparison between the Macintosh and the McCoy laryngoscope blades.Anaesthesia1996; 51: 977–980.
106.
McCoyE.P., MirakhurR.K., McCloskeyB.V.A comparison of the stress response to laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade.Anaesthesia1995; 50: 943–946.
107.
SugiyamaK., YokoyamaK.Head extension angle required for direct laryngoscopy with the McCoy laryngoscope blade.Anesthesiology2001; 94: 939.
108.
AoyamaK., NagaokaE., TakenakaI., KadoyaT.The McCoy laryngoscope expands the laryngeal aperture in patients with difficult intubation.Anesthesiology2000; 92: 1855–1856.
109.
McCoyE.P., MirakhurR.K., RaffertyC., BuntingH., AustinB.A.A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy. The Macintosh versus the McCoy blade.Anaesthesia1996; 51: 912–915.
110.
MacIntyreP.A., McLeodA.D., HurleyR., PeacockC.Cervical spine movements during laryngoscopy. Comparison of the Macintosh and McCoy laryngoscope blades.Anaesthesia1999; 54: 413–418.
111.
ChisholmD.G., CalderI.Experience with the McCoy laryngoscope in difficult laryngoscopy.Anaesthesia1997; 52: 906–908.
112.
LevitanR.M., OchrochE.A.Explaining the variable effect on laryngeal view obtained with the McCoy laryngoscope.Anaesthesia1999; 54: 599–601.
113.
McCoyE.The McCoy laryngoscope in infants and children.Can J Anesth2004; 51: 101–105.
114.
IohomG., FranklinR., CaseyW., LyonsB.The McCoy straight blade does not improve laryngoscopy and intubation in normal infants.Can J Anesth2004; 51: 155–159.
115.
MagillI.W.Technique in endotracheal anaesthesia.BMJ1930; 2: 817–820.
116.
HendersonJ.J.The use of paraglossal straight blade laryngoscopy in difficult tracheal intubation.Anaesthesia1997; 52: 552–560.
117.
WilliamsK.N., CarliF., CormackR.S.Unexpected, difficult laryngoscopy: a prospective survey in routine general surgery.Br J Anaesth1991; 66: 38–44.
118.
HendersonJ.J., FrerkC.M.Remember the straight laryngoscope.Br J Anaesth2002; 88: 151–152.
119.
AchenB., TerblancheO., FinucaneB.View of the larynx obtained using the Miller blade and paraglossal approach, compared to that with the Macintosh.Anaesth Intensive Care2008; 36: 717–721.
120.
SemjenF., BordesM., CrosA.M.Intubation of infants with Pierre Robin syndrome: the use of the paraglossal approach combined with a gum-elastic bougie in six consecutive cases.Anaesthesia2008; 63: 147–150.
121.
DohertyJ.S., FroomS.R., GildersleveC.D.Pediatric laryngoscopes and intubation aids old and new.Paediatr Anaesth2009; 19(Suppl 1): 30–37.
122.
ScholzA., FarnumN., WilkesA.R., HampsonM.A., HallJ.E.Minimum and optimum light output of Macintosh size 3 laryngoscopy blades: a manikin study.Anaesthesia2007; 62: 163–168.
123.
AndersonK.J., BhandalN.The effect of single use laryngoscopy equipment on illumination for tracheal intubation.Anaesthesia2002; 57: 773–777.
MuscarellaL.F.Reassessment of the risk of healthcare-acquired infection during rigid laryngoscopy.J Hosp Infect2008; 68: 101–107.
126.
JabreP., LerouxB., BrohonS., PenetC., LockeyD., AdnetF.A comparison of plastic single-use with metallic reusable laryngoscope blades for out-of-hospital tracheal intubation.Ann Emerg Med2007; 50: 258–263.
127.
EvansA., VaughanR.S., HallJ.E., MecklenburghJ., WilkesA.R.A comparison of the forces exerted during laryngoscopy using disposable and non-disposable laryngoscope blades.Anaesthesia2003; 58: 869–873.
128.
GoodwinN., WilkesA., HallJ.E.Strength of disposable laryngoscope blades.Anaesthesia2005; 60: 630–631.
129.
BluntM.C., BurchettK.R.Variant Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease and disposable anaesthetic equipment – balancing the risks.Br J Anaesth2003; 90: 1–3.
130.
GalinskiM., AdnetF., TranD., KaryoZ., QuintardH., DelettreD.Disposable laryngoscope blades do not interfere with ease of intubation in scheduled general anaesthesia patients.Eur J Anaesthesiol2003; 20: 731–735.
131.
JanakiramanC., HodzovicI., ReddyS., DesaiN., WilkesA.R., LattoI.P.Evaluation of tracheal tube introducers in simulated difficult intubation.Anaesthesia2009; 64: 309–314.
132.
HendersonJ.J.Development of the ‘gum-elastic bougie’.Anaesthesia2003; 58: 103–104.
133.
HodzovicI., LattoI.P., HendersonJ.J.Bougie trauma – what trauma?Anaesthesia2003; 58: 192–193.
134.
KadryM., PopatM.Pharyngeal wall perforation – an unusual complication of blind intubation with a gum elastic bougie.Anaesthesia1999; 54: 404–405.
135.
KadryT., HarveyM., WallaceM., ImrieJ.Frova intubating catheter position can be determined with aspirating oesophageal detection device.Emerg Med Australas2007; 19: 203–206.
136.
HodzovicI., LattoI.P., WilkesA.R., HallJ.E., MaplesonW.W.Evaluation of Frova, single-use intubation introducer, in a manikin. Comparison with Eschmann multiple-use introducer and Portex single-use introducer.Anaesthesia2004; 59: 811–816.
137.
HodzovicI., WilkesA.R., StaceyM., LattoI.P.Evaluation of clinical effectiveness of the Frova single-use tracheal tube introducer.Anaesthesia2008; 63: 189–194.
138.
SorbelloM., FrovaG.Frova introducer: neither a stylet nor simply an introducer.Anaesthesia2008; 63: 1010–1011.
139.
LevitanR.Passing the Tracheal Tube. In: The AirwayCam Guide to Intubation and Practical Emergency Airway Management.Pennsylvania: Airway Cam Technologies, Inc., 2004. p 147–160.
140.
LevitanR.M., PisaturoJ.T., KinkleW.C., ButlerK., EverettW.W.Stylet bend angles and tracheal tube passage using a straight-to-cuff shape.Acad Emerg Med2006; 13: 1255–1258.
141.
MacintoshR., RichardsH.Illuminated introducer for endotracheal tubes.Anaesthesia1957; 12: 223.
HungO.R., PytkaS., MorrisI., MurphyM., LauncelottG., StevensS.Clinical trial of a new lightwand device (Trachlight) to intubate the trachea.Anesthesiology1995; 83: 509–514.
144.
HungO.R., StewartR.D.Lightwand intubation: I – a new lightwand device.Can J Anesth1995; 42: 820–825.
145.
HungO.R., PytkaS., MorrisI., MurphyM., StewartR.D.Lightwand intubation: II – Clinical trial of a new lightwand for tracheal intubation in patients with difficult airways.Can J Anesth1995; 42: 826–830.
146.
HungO.R.Light-guided tracheal intubation through the laryngeal mask airway.Anesth Analg1997; 85: 1415.
WatanabeR.Modified long Trachlight wand for a doublelumen endobronchial tube.J Anesth2004; 18: 144–145.
150.
XueF.S., YangQ.Y., LiaoX.Topical anaesthesia of the airway using Trachlight and MADgic atomizer in patients with predicted difficult tracheal intubation.Br J Anaesth2007; 99: 920–921.
151.
TurkstraT.P., CraenR.A., PelzD.M., GelbA.W.Cervical spine motion: a fluoroscopic comparison during intubation with lighted stylet, GlideScope, and Macintosh laryngoscope.Anesth Analg2005; 101: 910–915.
152.
MassoE., SabateS., HinojosaM., VilaP., CanetJ., LangeronO.Lightwand tracheal intubation with and without muscle relaxation.Anesthesiology2006; 104: 249–254.
153.
XueF.S., YangQ.Y., LiaoX., HeN., LiuH.P.Lightwand guided intubation in paediatric patients with a known difficult airway: a report of four cases.Anaesthesia2008; 63: 520–525.
CooperR.M.Extubation and changing endotracheal tubes. In: HagbergC., ed. Benumof's Airway Management,2nd ed.Philadelphia: Mosby2007. p. 1146–1180.
158.
AsaiT., MorrisS.The laryngeal mask airway: its features, effects and role.Can J Anesth1994; 41: 930–960.
159.
BrullS.J., WiklundR., FerrisC., ConnellyN.R., EhrenwerthJ., SilvermanD.G.Facilitation of fiberoptic orotracheal intubation with a flexible tracheal tube.Anesth Analg1994; 78: 746–748.
160.
HakalaP., RandellT., ValliH.Comparison between tracheal tubes for orotracheal fibreoptic intubation.Br J Anaesth1999; 82: 135–136.
161.
BarkerK.F., BoltonP., ColeS., CoePAEase of laryngeal passage during fibreoptic intubation: a comparison of three endotracheal tubes.Acta Anaesthesiol Scand2001; 45: 624–626.
162.
KristensenM.S.The Parker Flex-Tip tube versus a standard tube for fiberoptic orotracheal intubation: a randomized double-blind study.Anesthesiology2003; 98: 354–358.
163.
SanukiT., HirokaneM., MatsudaY., SugiokaS., KotaniJ.The Parker Flexi-TipTM tube for nasotracheal intubation: the influence on nasal mucosa trauma.Anaesthesia2010; 65: 8–11.
164.
AsaiT.Tracheal intubation through the laryngeal mask airway.Anesthesiology1996; 85: 439.
165.
RothD.M., BenumofJ.L.Intubation through a laryngeal mask airway with a nasal RAE tube: stabilization of the proximal end of the tube.Anesthesiology1996; 85: 1220.
PreisC., PreisI.Concept for easy fiberoptic intubation via a laryngeal airway mask.Anesth Analg1999; 89: 803–804.
168.
BarnettR.A., OchrochE.A.Augmented fiberoptic intubation.Crit Care Clin2000; 16: 453–462.
169.
HarveyS.C., BaileyM.K., CookeJ.E.Usable versus overall tracheal tube length: the difference may be critical.Anesthesiology1997; 87: 173–174.
170.
AsaiT., LattoI.P., VaughanR.S.The distance between the grille of the laryngeal mask airway and the vocal cords.Is conventional intubation through the laryngeal mask safe? Anaesthesia1993; 48: 667–669.
171.
WeberT., SalviN., OrliaguetG., WolfA.Cuffed vs non-cuffed endotracheal tubes for pediatric anesthesia.Paediatr Anaesth2009; 19 Suppl 1: 46–54.
172.
HolzkiJ., LaschatM., PuderC.Stridor is not a scientifically valid outcome measure for assessing airway injury.Paediatr Anaesth2009; 19(Suppl 1): 180–197.
173.
WeissM., DullenkopfA., FischerJ.E., KellerC., GerberA.C.Prospective randomized controlled multi-centre trial of cuffed or uncuffed endotracheal tubes in small children.Br J Anaesth2009; 103: 867–873.
174.
OvassapianA., YelichS.J., DykesM.H., BrunnerE.E.Fiberoptic nasotracheal intubation – incidence and causes of failure.Anesth Analg1983; 62: 692–695.
175.
OvassapianA.Fiberoptic tracheal intubation in adults. In: OvassapianA. ed. Fiberoptic endoscopy and the difficult airway,2nd ed.Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven1996 p. 72–103.
176.
MeschinoA., DevittJ.H., KochJ.P., SzalaiJ.P., SchwartzM.L.The safety of awake tracheal intubation in cervical spine injury.Can J Anesth1992; 39: 114–117.
177.
MulderD.S., WallaceD.H., WoolhouseF.M.The use of the fiberoptic bronchoscope to facilitate endotracheal intubation following head and neck trauma.J Trauma1975; 15: 638–640.
178.
OvassapianA., KrejcieT.C., YelichS.J., DykesM.H.Awake fibreoptic intubation in the patient at high risk of aspiration.Br J Anaesth1989; 62: 13–16.
179.
BurtonJ.F., BakerA.B.Dental damage during anaesthesia and surgery.Anaesth Intensive Care1987; 15: 262–268.
180.
StackhouseR.A.Fiberoptic airway management.Anesthesiol Clin North America2002; 20: 933–951.
181.
DawsonA.J., MarslandC., BakerP., AndersonB.J.Fibreoptic intubation skills among anaesthetists in New Zealand.Anaesth Intensive Care2005; 33: 777–783.
182.
WoodallN.M., HarwoodR.J., BarkerG.L.Complications of awake fibreoptic intubation without sedation in 200 healthy anaesthetists attending a training course.Br J Anaesth2008; 100: 850–855.
AsaiT., LiuE.H., MatsumotoS., HirabayashiY., SeoN., SuzukiA.Use of the Pentax-AWS in 293 patients with difficult airways.Anesthesiology2009; 110: 898–904.
186.
MaharajC.H., CostelloJ.F., HarteB.H., LaffeyJ.G.Evaluation of the Airtraq and Macintosh laryngoscopes in patients at increased risk for difficult tracheal intubation.Anaesthesia2008; 63: 182–188.
187.
KimJ.T., NaH.S., BaeJ.Y., KimD.W., KimH.S., KimC.S.GlideScope video laryngoscope: a randomized clinical trial in 203 paediatric patients.Br J Anaesth2008; 101: 531–534.
188.
LangeM., FrommerM., RedelA., TrautnerH., HampelJ., KrankeP.Comparison of the Glidescope and Airtraq optical laryngoscopes in patients undergoing direct microlaryngoscopy.Anaesthesia2009; 64: 323–328.
189.
LiuE.H., WenderR., GoldmanA.J.The LMA CTrach in patients with difficult airways.Anesthesiology2009; 110: 941–943.
190.
FrerkC.M., LeeG.Laryngoscopy: time to change our view.Anaesthesia2009; 64: 351–354.
191.
SalemM.R., BarakaA.Confirmation of tracheal intubation. In: HagbergC., ed. Benumof's Airway Management,2nd ed.Philadelphia: Mosby2007. p. 697–727.
192.
BozemanW.P., HexterD., LiangH.K., KelenG.D.Esophageal detector device versus detection of end-tidal carbon dioxide level in emergency intubation.Ann Emerg Med1996; 27: 595–599.
193.
SharieffG.Q., RodarteA., WiltonN., BleyleD.The self-inflating bulb as an airway adjunct: is it reliable in children weighing less than 20 kilograms?Acad Emerg Med2003; 10: 303–308.
194.
SharieffG.Q., RodarteA., WiltonN., SilvaP.D., BleyleD.The self-inflating bulb as an esophageal detector device in children weighing more than twenty kilograms: a comparison of two techniques.Ann Emerg Med2003; 41: 623–629.
FrerkC., FramptonC.Cricothyroidotomy; time for change.Anaesthesia2006; 61: 921–923.
200.
WongD.T., LaiK., ChungF.F., HoR.Y.Cannot intubate-cannot ventilate and difficult intubation strategies: results of a Canadian national survey.Anesth Analg2005; 100: 1439–1446.
201.
SdralesL., BenumofJ.L.Prevention of kinking of a percutaneous transtracheal intravenous catheter.Anesthesiology1995; 82: 288–291.
202.
YildizY., PreusslerN.P., SchreiberT., HueterL., GaserE., SchubertH.Percutaneous transtracheal emergency ventilation during respiratory arrest: comparison of the oxygen flow modulator with a hand-triggered emergency jet injector in an animal model.Am J Emerg Med2006; 24: 455–459.
203.
PreusslerN.P., SchreiberT., HuterL., GottschallR., SchubertH., RekH.Percutaneous transtracheal ventilation: effects of a new oxygen flow modulator on oxygenation and ventilation in pigs compared with a hand triggered emergency jet injector.Resuscitation2003; 56: 329–333.
204.
HeardA.M., GreenR.J., EakinsP.The formulation and introduction of a ‘can't intubate, can't ventilate’ algorithm into clinical practice.Anaesthesia2009; 64: 601–608.
205.
Practical procedures-airway and breathing. In: Mackway-JonesK., ed. Advanced Paediatric Life Support: The Practical Approach, 4th ed.London: BMJ Publishing2005. p. 224–225.
206.
ElliottW.G.Airway management in the injured child.Int Anesthesiol Clin1994; 32: 27–46.
207.
CoteC.J., HartnickC.J.Pediatric transtracheal and cricothyrotomy airway devices for emergency use: which are appropriate for infants and children?Paediatr Anaesth2009; 19(Suppl 1): 66–76.
208.
LutenR., KissoonN., GodwinS., MurphyM.Unique Airway Issues in the Pediatric Population. In: HungO., MurphyM., eds. Management of the Difficult and Failed Airway.New York: McGraw Hill Medical2008. p. 381–388.
209.
NavsaN., TosselG., BoonJ.M.Dimensions of the neonatal cricothyroid membrane – how feasible is a surgical cricothyroidotomy?Paediatr Anaesth2005; 15: 402–406.
210.
RavussinP., Bayer-BergerM., MonnierP., SavaryM., FreemanJ.Percutaneous transtracheal ventilation for laser endoscopic procedures in infants and small children with laryngeal obstruction: report of two cases.Can J Anesth1987; 34: 83–86.
211.
SmithR.B., MyersE.N., ShermanH.Transtracheal ventilation in paediatric patients; case reports.Br J Anaesth1974; 46: 313–314.
212.
CravenR.M., VannerR.G.Ventilation of a model lung using various cricothyrotomy devices.Anaesthesia2004; 59: 595–599.
213.
SchaeferR., HueterL., PreusslerN.P., SchreiberT., SchwarzkopfK.Percutaneous transtracheal emergency ventilation with a self-made device in an animal model.Paediatr Anaesth2007; 17: 972–976.
214.
RyderI.G., PaoloniC.C., HarleC.C.Emergency transtracheal ventilation: assessment of breathing systems chosen by anaesthetists.Anaesthesia1996; 51: 764–768.
215.
HamaekersA., BorgP., EnkD.Limitations of self-made jet devices.Paediatr Anaesth2008; 18: 984.
216.
HamaekersA., BorgP., EnkD.The importance of flow and pressure release in emergency jet ventilation devices.Paediatr Anaesth2009; 19: 452–457.
217.
HamaekersA.E., BorgP.A., EnkD.A bench study of ventilation via two self-assembled jet devices and the Oxygen Flow Modulator in simulated upper airway obstruction.Anaesthesia2009; 64: 1353–1358.
218.
Advanced Paediatric Life Support, 4th ed.Blackwell Publishing Ltd.2005. p. 224–225.
219.
BakerP.A., BrownA.J.Experimental adaptation of the Enk oxygen flow modulator for potential pediatric use.Paediatr Anaesth2009; 19: 458–463.
220.
McLaughlinJ., IsersonK.V.Emergency pediatric tracheostomy: a usable technique and model for instruction.Ann Emerg Med1986; 15: 463–465.
221.
ToyeF.J., WeinsteinJ.D.Clinical experience with percutaneous tracheostomy and cricothyroidotomy in 100 patients.J Trauma1986; 26: 1034–1040.
222.
NaguibM., BrullS.J.Update on neuromuscular pharmacology.Curr Opin Anaesthesiol2009; 22: 483–490.
223.
NaguibM.Sugammadex: another milestone in clinical neuromuscular pharmacology.Anesth Analg2007; 104: 575–581.
224.
de BoerH.D., van EgmondJ., van de PolF., BomA., BooijL.H.Sugammadex, a new reversal agent for neuromuscular block induced by rocuronium in the anaesthetized Rhesus monkey.Br J Anaesth2006; 96: 473–479.
225.
CalderI., YentisS.M.Could ‘safe practice’ be compromising safe practice? Should anaesthetists have to demonstrate that face mask ventilation is possible before giving a neuromuscular blocker?Anaesthesia2008; 63: 113–115.
226.
BenumofJ.L., DaggR., BenumofR.Critical hemoglobin desaturation will occur before return to an unparalyzed state following 1 mg/kg intravenous succinylcholine.Anesthesiology1997; 87: 979–982.
