This paper examines the relationship between new forms of work organization and worker empowerment from the perspective of workers. The data is drawn from a survey of 5,635 Canadian automobile workers. Workers were asked questions about their work-load, health and safety conditions, empowerment, and relations with management. It examines what it is like to work in plants organized according to the principles of lean production and compares empowerment in lean plants and traditionally organized plants.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Abo, Tetsuo (ed.) (1994) Hybrid Factory: The Japanese Production System in the United States. Oxford.
2.
Adler, Paul S. (1992) ‘The Learning Bureaucracy: New United Motor Manufacturing Inc.’,Research in Organizational Behaviour, Vol.15: 111–94.
3.
Adler, P.S. and R. E. Cole (1993) ‘Designed for Learning: A Tale of Two Auto Plants’,Sloan Management Review Vol.34: 85–94.
4.
Babson, Steve (1993) ‘Lean or Mean: The MIT Model and Lean Production at Mazda’,Labour Studies Journal, Vol.18: 3–24.
5.
Babson, Steve (ed.) (1995) Lean Work, Empowerment and Exploitation in the Global Auto Industry. Detroit.
6.
Baldamus, W. (1961) Efficiency and Effort. London.
7.
Belanger, Jacques (1994) ‘Job Control under Different Labor Relations Regimes’, in J. Belanger et al., (ed.) Workplace Industrial Relations and the Global Challenge. Ithaca.
8.
Berggren, Christian (1992) Alternatives to Lean Production: Work Organization in the Swedish Auto Industry. Ithaca.
9.
Blauner, Robert (1964) Alienation and Freedom. Chicago.
10.
Burawoy, M. (1979) Manufacturing Consent: Changes in the Labor Process under Monopoly Capitalism. Chicago.
11.
CAW-Canada Research Group on CAMI (1993) The CAMI Report: Lean Production in a Unionized Auto Plant. Willowdale.
12.
Chinoy, Eli (1955) Automobile Workers and the American Dream. Boston.
13.
Fucini, J.J., and S. Fucini (1990) Working for the Japanese: Inside Mazda's American Auto Plant. New York.
14.
Garrahan, P., and P. Stewart (1992) The Nissan Enigma: Flexibility at Work in a Local Economy. London.
15.
Graham, L. (1995) On the Line at Subaru-Isuz. Ithaca.
16.
Green, W.C. and E. J. Yanarella (1966) North American Auto Unions in Crisis, Lean Production as Contested Terrain. Albany.
17.
Hadley, Karen (1994) ‘Working Lean and Mean: A Gendered Experience of Restructuring in an Electronics Manufacturing Plant’ (Ph.D thesis), Toronto.
18.
Herzenberg, Stephen (1994) ‘Shopfloor Relations at US and Canadian Plants of an Automotive Parts Supplier, 1936-1988’, in Belanger et al., (ed.) Workplace Industrial Relations and the Global Challenge. Ithaca.
19.
Karasek, Robert and Tores Theorell (1990) Healthy Work: Stress, Productivity and the Reconstruction of Working Life. New York.
20.
Kenney and Florida (1993) Beyond Mass Production: The Japanese System and its Transfer to the U.S. New York.
21.
Kumar, Pradeep and John Holmes (1996) ‘Continuity and Change: Evolving Human Resource Policies and Practices in the Canadian Automobile Industry’. Queen's University, Kingston.
22.
Lewchuk, W. (1993) ‘Men and Monotony: Fraternalism as a Managerial Strategy at the Ford Motor Company’,Journal of Economic History, Vol.53: 824–57.
23.
Lewchuk, W., and D. Robertson (1996) ‘Working Conditions under Lean Production: A Worker-based Benchmarking Study’,Asia Pacific Business Review (Summer) Vol.2: 60–81.
24.
Macdonald, Cara (1996) En-Gendering Lean Production: Women Workers in the Ontario Independent Auto Parts Industry, MA Thesis, York University.
25.
MacDuffie, John Paul (1995) ‘Human Resources Bundles and Manufacturing Performance.’Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.48: 192–221.
26.
Marsh, Robert M. (1992) ‘The Difference Between Participation and Power in Japanese Factories’,Industrial and Labor Relations Review, Vol.45: 250–7.
27.
Mathewson, S.B. (1969) Restriction of Output Among Unorganized Workers. Carbondale.
28.
Murphy, C. and D. Olthuis (1995) ‘The Impact of Work Reorganization on Employee Attitudes Towards Work, the Company and the Union: Report of a Survey at Walkers Exhaust’, in Christopher Schenk and John Anderson, Reshaping Work: Union Responses to Technological Change. Toronto.
29.
Nash, A. (1976) ‘Job Satisfaction: A Critique’, in B.J. Widick (ed.) Auto Work and Its Discontents. Baltimore: 61-88.
30.
Noble, David (1984) Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation. New York.
31.
OECD (1996) Technology, Productivity and Job Creation, Vol 2. Paris.
32.
Oliver, Nick, et al. (1994) Worldwide Manufacturing Competitiveness Study: The Second Lean Enterprise Report. Anderson Consulting.
33.
Parker, Mike and Jane Slaughter (1988) Choosing Sides: Unions and the Team Concept. Boston.
34.
Pil, F.K., and J.P. MacDuffie (1996) ‘Canada at the Cross-Roads: A Comparative Analysis of the Canadian Auto Industry’ (Unpublished).
35.
Rinehart, J., C. Huxley and D. Robertson (1997) Just Another Car Factory? Lean Production and its Discontents. Cornell.
36.
Roy, Donald (1952) ‘Restriction of Output in a Piecework Machine Shop’, Ph.D, University of Chicago.
37.
Stewart, P., and P. Garrahan (1995) ‘Employee Responses to New Management Techniques in the Auto Industry’,Work, Employment and Society, Vol.9: 517–36.
38.
Williams et al. (1992) ‘Against Lean Production’,Economy and Society Vol.21: 321–54.
39.
Williams et al. (1994) Cars: Analysis, History, Cases. Providence.
40.
Womack, J.P., D. Jones and D. Roos (1990) The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production. New York.
