This article discusses a number of issues related to the empirical methodology for testing Marx's main arguments. It argues that a recent article in Capital & Class is plagued by methodological and empirical errors and that empirical examination of the validity of Marxian theory has to be based on a more unified and consistent methodological framework similar to that developed by Shaikh and Tonak (1994).
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Armstrong, P., Glyn, A. and Harrison, P. (1991) Capitalism since 1945, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
2.
Bowles, S., Gordon, D., Weisskopf, T. (1990) After the Waste Land, M.E. Sharpe, Armonk.
3.
Central Statistical Office (1990) United Kingdom National Accounts, HMSO, London.
4.
Cockshott, P., Cottrell, A. and Michaelson, G. (1995) ‘Testing Marx: Some new results from UK data’ in Capital & Class55, Spring: 103–29.
5.
Cullenberg, S. (1994) ‘Unproductive Labor and the Contradictory Movement of the Rate of Profit: A Comment on Moseley’ in Review of Radical Political EconomicsVol. 26(2): 111–21.
6.
Desai, M. (1991) ‘Methodological problems in quantitative Marxism’ in P. Dunne (ed.) Quantitative Marxism.Polity Press, Cambridge: 27–41.
7.
Dunne, P. (ed.) (1991) Quantitative Marxism.Polity Press, Cambridge
8.
Freeman, A. (1991) ‘National Accounts in value terms: the social wage and profit rate in Britain 1950 1986’, in P. Dunne (ed.) Quantitative Marxism.Polity Press, Cambridge: 84–106.
9.
Gillman, J. (1957) The Falling Rate of Profit: Marx's Law and its Significance to Twentieth Century Capitalism.Oxford University Press, Oxford.
10.
Glyn, A. and B. Sutcliffe (1972) Capitalism in Crisis: British Capitalism, Workers and the Profit Squeeze, Penguin, Harmondsworth.
11.
Gouverneur, J. (1983) Contemporary Capitalism and Marxist Economics, M. Robertson, Oxford.
12.
Gouverneur, J. (1990) ‘Productive labour, price/value ratio and the rate of surplus value: theoretical viewpoints and empirical evidence’ in Cambridge Journal of EconomicsVol.14: 1–27.
13.
Laibman, D. (1993) ‘The falling rate of profit: a new empirical study’ in Science and Society57(2) Summer: 223–33.
14.
Mage, S. (1963) ‘The law of the falling tendency of the rate of profit’ Ph.D Dissertation, Columbia University.
15.
Mandel, E. (1975) Late Capitalism, Verso, London.
16.
Mandel, E. (1976) ‘Introduction’ in K. Marx, Capital, Vol.1, Vintage, New York.
17.
Marx, K. (1976) Capital, Vol.1, Vintage, New York.
18.
Moseley, F. (1991) The Falling Rate of Profit in the Postwar United States Economy.St. Martin's Press, New York.
19.
Moseley, F. (1994a) ‘Unproductive Labour and the Rate of Profit: a reply’ in Science and Society58(1) Spring: 84–92.
20.
Moseley, F. (1994b) ‘Unproductive Labour and the Rate of Profit: A Reply to Cullenberg's Comment’ in Review of Radical Political EconomicsVol.26(2): 121–28.
21.
Papadimitriou, D. (1990) ‘The Political Economy of Greece: An Empirical Analysis of Marxian Economics’ in European Journal of Political Economy6: 181–99.
22.
Shaikh, A. (1978) ‘National Income Accounts and Marxian Categories’ Mimeo, New School for Social Research.
23.
Shaikh, A. and E.A. Tonak (1987) ‘The Welfare State and the Myth of the Social Wage’ in R. Cherry et al. (eds.) The Imperiled Economy, Book I. Union for Radical Political Economics, New York.
24.
Shaikh, A. and E.A. Tonak (1994) Measuring the Wealth of Nations: The Political Economy of National Accounts.Cambridge University Press, New York.
25.
Smith, M. (1993) ‘Productivity, Valorization and Crisis: Socially Necessary Unproductive Labour in Contemporary Capitalism’ in Science and Society57(3): 262–93.
26.
Weisskopf, T. (1979) ‘Marxian crisis theory and the rate of profit in the postwar U.S. economy’ in Cambridge Journal of Economics3, December: 341–78.
27.
Weisskopf, T. (1992) ‘A Comparative Analysis of Profitability Trends in Advanced Capitalist Economies’ in F. Moseley and E. Wolff (eds.) International Perspectives on Profitability and Accumulation, Edward Elgar, London.
28.
Wolff, E. (1994) ‘Is a Discussion of Unproductive Labour Still Productive?’ in Science and Society58(2) Summer 1994: 204–10.
