The article examines the impact of deregulation in the US telecommunications industry on communications workers and unions. The erosion of the traditional telephone monopoly is explained as part of the crisis of the postwar US economy's Fordist mode of development. Theoretically, the analysis draws upon a critical reception of French regulation theory and the so-called state-derivation debate among West-German Marxists.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aglietta, M. (1979) A Theory of Capitalist Regulation. The US Experience.London.
2.
Armanski, G. (1977) ‘Krise und Klassenkämpfe im öffentlichen Dienst der USA’ in G. Armanski and B. Penth [eds] Klassenbewegung, Staat und Krise. Konflikte im öffentlichen Dienst Westeuropas und der USA.Berlin.
3.
AT&T (1955) Our Company and How It Operates. A Text of General Information for Employees of the Long Lines Department.New York.
4.
Bahr, M. (1985) ‘Divestiture: One Year Later’ in Hot Line January.
5.
Bar, F. and M. Borrus (1989) From public access to private connections: Network strategies and competitive advantage in US telecommunications.BRIE/OECD, Berkeley.
6.
Beirne, J.A. (1959) The Job Revolution in Telephones.Washington, D.C.
7.
Bonefeld, W. (1987) ‘Reformulation of state theory’ in Capital&Class33, Winter.
8.
Breyer, S. (1982) Regulation and Its Reform.Cambridge, Mass.
9.
Brock, G. W. (1981) The Telecommunications Industry. The Dynamics of Market Structures.Cambridge, Mass./London.
10.
Burawoy, M. (1985) The Politics of Production. Factory Regimes under Capitalism and Socialism.London.
11.
Byrkjeflot, H. (1989) From Telephone Operators to ‘Work Station Professionals’? Technological Change, Markets, and Dilemmas of Control in the United States Telecommunications Industry.Bergen.
12.
Castells, M. (1988) ‘Hochtechnologie, Weltmarktentwicklung und strukturelle Transformation’ in Prokla71.
13.
Chinloy, P. (1981) Sources of Productivity Growth at the Firm Level: The Bell-System 1947–1978.Communications Workers of America, Washington, D.C.
14.
Clarke, S. (1988) ‘Overaccumulation, class struggle and the regulation approach’ in Capital&Class34, Spring.
15.
Clarke, S. (1990) ‘New utopias for old: Fordist dreams and Post-Fordist fantasies’ in Capital&Class42, Winter.
16.
Coll, S. (1986) The Deal of the Century. The Breakup of AT&T.New York.
17.
Coon, H. (1939) American Tel. & Tel. The Story of a Great Monopoly.New York/Toronto.
18.
Cooper, M.N. (1986) Local Rate Increases in the Post-Divestiture Era: Excessive Returns to Telephone Company Capital.Consumer Federation of America Mimeo.. Washington, D.C.
19.
Cooper, M.N. (1987) The Telecommunications Needs of Older, Low Income und General Consumers in the Post-Divestiture Era.American Association of Retired Persons and Consumer Federation of America Mimeo.. Washington, D.C.
20.
Craypo, C. (1986) ‘Bargaining in a Restructured Environment in Telecommunications’ in Labor Law Journal, August 1986.
21.
Communications Workers of America see CWA
22.
CWA (1983a) Phone Rate Facts. CWA on the Issues.Washington, D.C.
23.
CWA (1983b) Future Report.Washington, D.C.
24.
CWA (1989) Information Industry Report. February.
25.
CWA (1992) Report by the Task Force on Telecommunications Technology and Regulation to the 54th Annual Convention, Miami, Florida, April 6–8 1992. Mimeo.
26.
Danielian, N.R. (1939) AT&T – The Story of Industrial Conquest.New York.
27.
Davis, M. (1986) Prisoners of the American Dream. Politics and Economy in the History of the American Working Class.London.
28.
de Sola Pool, I. (1976) ‘The Social Effects of the Telephone’ in AT&T [ed.] The Telephone's First Century and Beyond.Basking Ridge, N.J.
29.
DeLamarter, R.T. (1986) Big Blue: IBM's Use and Abuse of Power.New York.
30.
Dodsworth, T., and S. Fleming (1984) ‘US Anti-Trust Policy: Bigness isn't bad, but…’ in Financial Times 27/2/1984.
31.
Early, S. (1991) ‘Striking NYNEX’ in Labor Research Review, Spring.
32.
Early, S., and R. Wilson (1986) ‘Organising High Tech: Unions and their Future’ in Labor Research Review, Spring.
33.
Eisenscher, M. (1993) ‘Gewerkschaftliche Organisierung in der Computerindustrie. Die Erfahrungen des UE Electronics Organising Committees im ‘Silicon Valley’’ in B. Lüthje and C. Scherrer [eds.] Jenseits des Sozialpaktes Neue Unternehmensstrategien, Gewerkschaften und Arbeitskämpfe in den USA.Münster.
34.
FCC (1939) Investigation of the Telephone Industry of the United States.Washington, D.C.
35.
Ferguson, C.H. (1990) ‘Computers and the Coming of the US Keiretsu’ in Harvard Business Review, July–August.
36.
Hacker, S. (1979) ‘Sex Stratification, Technology and Organizational Change: A Longitudinal Case Study of AT&T’ in Social ProblemsVol. 26, No. 3, June.
37.
Heinrich, M. (1989) ‘Capital in General and Marx's Capital’ in Capital&Class 38 Summer.
38.
Hilton, M. (1987) Employment Trends in Telecommunications.CWA Research Department. Mimeo., Washington, D.C.
39.
Hirsch, J. (1976) ‘Bemerkungen zu einem theoretischen Ansatz einer Analyse des bürgerlichen Staates’ in Gesellschaft—Beiträge zur Marx'schen Theorie 8/9. Frankfurt am Main.
40.
Hirsch, J. (1990) Kapitalismus ohne Alternative?Hamburg.
41.
Holloway, J. (1988) ‘The Great Bear, post-Fordism and class struggle: A comment on Bonefeld and Jessop’ in Capital&Class36, Winter.
42.
Howard, R. (1986) Brave New Workplace.New York.
43.
Howard, R. (1988) ‘Has the ‘QWL Process’ Obscured Labor's Lack of Control Over Technological Change?’ in Hot Line, Spring.
44.
Hübner, K. (1989) Theorie der Regulation. Eine kritische Rekonstruktion eines neuen Ansatzes der Politischen Ökonomie.Berlin.
45.
Jacobson, R. (1989) An Open Approach to Information Policy Making.Norwood, N.J.
46.
Jessop, B. (1982) The Capitalist State.Oxford.
47.
Jessop, B. (1988) ‘Regulation theory, post Fordism and the state: more than a reply to Werner Bonefeld’ in Capital&Class34, Spring.
48.
Kahn, A.E. (1971) The Economics of Regulation: Principles and Institutions.New York.
49.
Kleinsteuber, H.J. (1987) ‘Telekommunikationspolitik und Deregulierung in den USA. Der Fall der American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T)’, in Rundfunk und FernsehenVol. 35, 1987/2.
50.
Kohl, G. (1982) ‘Changing Competitive and Technology Environment in Telecommunications’ in D. Kennedy et al [eds.] Labor and Technology. Union Response in a Changing Environment.Pennsylvania State University Department of Labor Studies.
51.
Kriz, M.E. (1989) ‘Ringing the Bells’ in National Journal, 4/2/1989.
52.
Labor Resource Center (1990) Holding the Line in 1989. Lessons of the NYNEX Strike.Somerville, Ma.
53.
Lipietz, A. (1985) The Enchanted World. Inflation, Credit and the World Crisis.London.
54.
Lüthje, B. (1986) ‘Regulierungskrise im Telekommunikationssektor der BRD’ in Prokla, No. 64.
55.
Lüthje, B. (1989) ‘Neuordnung der Telekommunikation in den USA – Auswirkungen auf Arbeitnehmer und Gewerkschaften’ in WSI-Mitteilungen 2/89.
56.
Lüthje, B. (1992) Technologieentwicklung und Regulierung im ‘Breitbandzeitalter’ – Zur regulierungspolitischen Problematik des RACE-Forschungsprogramms der Europäischen Gemeinschaft. Eine Problembeschreibung im Auftrag des Hauptvorstandes der Deutschen Postgewerkschaft.Frankfurt, mimeo.
57.
Lüthje, B. (1993) Die Neuordnung der Telekommunikationsindustrie in den USA. Krise fordistischer Akkumulation, Deregulierungspolitik und Gewerkschaften.Wiesbaden.
58.
Maccoby, M., and J.P. MacDuffy (1986) The Organizational Implications of New Technologies: Remote Work Centres at AT&T Communications.Harvard University, John F. Kennedy Institute of Government, Program on Technology, Public Policy, and Human Development, mimeo.
59.
Majone, G. [ed.] (1990) Deregulation or Re-Regulation? Regulatory Reform in the United States and Europe.London/New York.
60.
Markoff, J. (1993) ‘The information super highway. A key project of Clinton and Gore raises a debate: public or private?’ in The New York Times 24/1/1993.
61.
Meyer, J. R., R. W. Wilson, M. A. Baughcum, E. Burton and L. Caouette (1980) The Economics of Competition in the Telecommunications Industry.Charles River Associates. Cambridge, Mass.
62.
Montgomery, D. (1979) Workers' Control in America. Studies in the History of Work, Technology, and Labor Struggles.Cambridge, Mass.
63.
Moody, K. (1988) An Injury to All. The Decline of American Unionism.London/New York.
64.
Moody, K. (1992) ‘AT&T: Half-Hearted Mobilisation Wins Predictable Results’ in Labor Notes, August.
65.
Newman, D.M. (1982) New Technology and the Changing Labor Process in the Telephone Industry: The Union's Response.Mimeo., New York.
66.
Newman, D.M. (1993) ‘Neue Technologien, Deregulierung und Arbeitskämpfe im US-Telekommunikationssektor’ in B. Lüthje and C. Scherrer [eds.] Jenseits des Sozialpaktes—Neue Unternehmensstrategien, Gewerkschaften und Arbeitskämpfe in den USA.Münster.
67.
Noam, E. M. (1988) ‘Die Entwicklung der Telekommunikation in den Vereinigten Staaten seit der Entflechtung von AT&T’ in Zeitschrift für das Post-und Fernmeldewesen 12/1988.
68.
OECD (1983) Telecommunications. Pressures and policies for Change.Paris.
69.
Peléez, E., and J. Holloway (1990) ‘Learning to Bow: Post-Fordism and Technological Determinism’ in Science as Culture8.
70.
Posner, R.A. (1974) ‘Theories of Economic Regulation’ in The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, Autumn.
71.
Projektgruppe ‘Soziale und beschäftigungspolitische Folgewirkungen neuer Kommunikationstechniken bei der Deutschen Bundespost in Hessen’, Universität Frankfurt (1988) ‘…Stück für Stück verkauft.’ Umbau der Bundespost—Folgen für die Beschäftigten. Deutsche Postgewerkschaft, Bezirk Hessen [ed.]. Frankfurt am Main.
72.
Scherrer, C. (1991) ‘Seeking a Way out of Fordism: The US Steel and Auto Industries’ in Capital & Class 44 Summer.
73.
Schiller, D. (1982) Telematics and Government Norwood.N.J.
74.
Schlesinger, L. A., D. Dyer, T. N. Clough and D. Landau (1987) Chronicles of Corporate Change. Management Lessons from AT&T and its Offspring.Lexington, Mass./Toronto.
75.
Simon, S. (1985) After Divestiture: What the AT&T Settlement Means for Business and Residential Telephone Service.White Plains, N.Y.
76.
Stigler, G. (1971) The Theory of Economic Regulation.Urbana/Chicago.
77.
Straw, R.J. and C. C. Heckscher (1984) ‘QWL: New Working Relationships in the Communications Industry’ in Labor Studies Journal, Winter.
78.
Tunstall, B.W. (1985) Disconnecting Parties. Managing the Bell-System Break-Up: An Inside View.New York.
79.
US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment (1987) The Electronic Supervisor—New Technology, New Tensions.Washington, D.C.
80.
US Department of Commerce (1989) US Industrial Outlook 1989.Washington, D.C.
81.
US Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1985) Issues in Domestic Telecommunications: Directions for National Policy.Washington, D.C.
82.
US Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1985b) NTIA Competition Benefits Report.Washington, D.C.
83.
US Department of Commerce, National Telecommunications and Information Administration (1987) NTIA Trade Report: Assessing the Effects of Changing the AT&T Antitrust Consent Decree.Washington, D.C.
84.
US Department of Justice, Antitrust Division (1987) The Geodesic Network. 1987 Report On Competition in the Telephone Industry. Prepared by Peter W. Huber as a consultant to the Department of Justice. Washington D.C.
85.
US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Management Relations and Cooperative Programs (1985) Quality of Worklife: AT&T and CWA Reexamine Process after three Years.Washington, D.C.
86.
Unger, L. (1989) Q.W.L.—An Anti-Union Strategy.United Nations Association of the USA, Economic Policy Commission Panel: Competing in a Global Market. The Challenge to Business and Labor. Mimeo., New York.
87.
Wieland, B. (1985) Die Entflechtung des amerikanischen Fernmeldemonopols.Schriftenreihe des wissenschaftlichen Instituts für Kommunikationsdienste der Deutschen Bundespost. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/Tokyo.
88.
Winkler, I. (1989) ‘Phone Contracts No Better Than '86, Despite Mobilisation’ in Labor Notes, October.
89.
Winkler, I. and J. Slaughter (1989) ‘Phone Workers Beat Back Health Cuts at NYNEX’ in Labor Notes, December.
