Connecting with earlier debates in Capital & Class, this article criticises the model of flexible specialisation, popularised by Sabel, Piore and others. Drawing upon his own extensive research in the Emelia-Romagna district of Italy, Fergus Murray rejects the view that workers stand to benefit, materially and politically, from new flexible labour processes. The paper briefly considers the implications for alternative strategies of economic restructuring.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Aglietta, M. (1979) A Theory of Capitalist Regulation, London: Verso.
2.
Brusco, S. (1982) ‘The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration’, Cambridge Journal of Economics, no. 3.
3.
Brusco, S. & Sabel, C. (1981) ‘Artisan Production and Economic Growth’, in Wilkinson, F. (ed.), The Dynamics of Labour Market Segmentation, London: Academic Press.
4.
Daneo, C. (1972) ‘Struttura Economica e Strategia Politica del Dopoguerra’, Note e Rassegne, nos. 33-4.
5.
FLM Bologna (1975) Ristrutturazione e Organizzazione del Lavoro, Rome: SEUSI.
6.
FLM Bologna (1977) Occupazione Sviluppo Economico Territorio, Rome: SEUSI.
7.
FLM Emilia-Romagna (1981a) Quaderni di Appunti, no. 2, November.FLM Emilia-Romagna (1981b) Analisi del Decentramento Produttivo, Bologna: FLM.
8.
Lungarella, R. (1981) Investimenti, Occupazione, Governo dell' Artigianato: L'Esperienza dell' Emilia-Romagna, Bologna: /cress Bologna: /cress.
9.
Murray, F. (1983) ‘The Decentralisation of Production and the Decline of the Mass-Collective Worker?’Capital & Class19.
10.
Murray, F. (1984) Industrial Restructuring and Working Class Politics in Post-War Italy, unpublished PhD Thesis, Bristol University.
11.
Piore, M. & Sabel, C. (1984) The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books.
12.
Sabel, C.Work and Politics, Cambridge University Press.
13.
Sechi, S. (1978) ‘Il PCI e le Contraddizioni del suo Blocco Sociale in Emilia’, Unitjá Proletaria, no. 3.
