Nuclear power is not a technology of the kind which, harmful under capitalism, can be made benign by socialism. It is a dead-end technology that should be rejected altogether. The state however is deeply implicated in its development, marxism is compromised by acceptance of super-industrialism and the trade union movement is largely pro-nuclear. The new green movements will be endangered by seeking incorporation into a traditional socialist programme.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
For example, E.H.S. Burhop, ‘The peaceful applications of atomic energy’, The Marxist Quarterly, Vol 1, No. 2, April 1954, pp.82–93.
2.
Margaret Gowing and Lorna Arnold, The atomic bomb, London etc.: Butterworths1979.
3.
Friedrich Münzinger, Atomkraft: Der Ban ortsfester and beweglicher Atomantriebe und seine wirtschaftlichen und technischen Problems, 3rd ed., Berlin etc: Springer1960, pp. 259–260.
4.
Harold Orlans, Contracting for atoms: A study of public policy issues posed by the Atomic Energy Commission's contracting for research, development and managerial services, Washington, DC: Brookings Institution1967.
5.
Ulrich Rödel, Forschungsprioritäten und gesellschaftliche Entwicklung: Studie über die Determinanten der Forschung und Technologiepolitik inden USA, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp1972, pp. 147, 169–170.
6.
Irvin C. Bupp and Jean-Claude Derian, Light Water: How the nuclear dream dissolved, New York: Basic Books1978, pp. 19–20.
7.
Harald Glatz, ‘Zum Durchsetzungsprozeβ von Kerntechnologien’, österreickische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenshaft, Vol. 9, No. 1, 1980, pp.81–91.
8.
On the nuclear development in the US, see in particular Wendy Allen, Nuclear reactors for generating electricity: US Development from 1946 to 1963, Santa Monica Ca: RAND Corporation1977;
9.
Frank G Davvson, Nuclear Power: Development and management of a technology, Seattle, Wa.: University of Washington Press1976;
10.
Philip Mullenbach, Civilian nuclear power: Economic issues and policy formation, New York: Twentieth Century Fund1963;
11.
Lee C Nehrt, International marketing of nuclear power plants, Bloomington Ind.: Indiana University Press1966;
12.
Robert Perry et al., Development and commercialization of the light water reactor, 1946–1976, Santa Monica, Ca: RAND Corporation 1977;
13.
Harold Orlans, op, cit. (ref. 4);
14.
Irwin C Bupp and Jean-Claude Derian, op. cit. (ref 6).
15.
Irwin C Bupp and Jean Claude Derian, op. cit (ref. 6), p.40.
16.
Robert Perry et.al, op. cit. (ref. 8), p.35
17.
This point is well made by Irwin C Bupp, and Jean-Claude Derian op. cit., (ref 6).
18.
Op. cit., pp.74–75.
19.
Op. cit., p. 50;
20.
Peter deLeon, Development and diffusion of the nuclear power reactor: A comparative analysis, Cambridge, Ma.: Ballinger1979, p.217.
21.
Irwin C Bupp, and Jean-Claude Derian, op.cit., (ref 6), pp.74–75;
22.
Robert Perry et al., op.cit. (ref 8), p.80.
23.
Robert Perry etal., op. cit. (ref 8), p.46.
24.
Man Lönnroth, and William Walker, The viability of the civil nuclear industry, New York/London: Rockefeller Foundation/Royal Institute of International Affairs1979.
25.
William Walker, ‘Utilities and energy conservation: Implications of recent developments in utility policy in the United States’, in: Facing the Energy Future: does Britain need new energy institutions?London: Royal Institute of Public Administration1981, pp. 61–69.
26.
Barry R. Weingast, ‘Congress, regulation, and the decline of nuclear power’, Public Policy, Vol. 28, No. 2, Spring 1980, pp.231–255.
27.
On the German nuclear development, see Helga Bufe and Jürgen Grumbach, Staat und Atomindustrie: Kernenergiepolitik in der BRD, Cologne: Pahl Rugenstein1979;
28.
Christian Deubner, ‘The expansion of West German capital and the founding of Euratom’, International Organization, Vol 33, No.2, Spring 1979, pp.203–228;
29.
Otto Keck, Policymaking in a nuclear program: the case of the West German fast breeder reactor, Lexington, Ma: Lexington D.C. Heath & Co.1981;
30.
Herbert Kitschelt, Kernenergiepolitik: Arena eines gesellschaftlichen Konflikts, Frankfurt/New York: Campus1980;
31.
Lutz Mez, ‘Atompolitik - Der unaufhaltsame Aufstieg zur Atommacht?’ in: Hans-Karl Rupp (ed.), Die andere Bundesrepublik: Geschichte und Perspektiven, Marburg/Lahn:Guttandin & Hoppe 1980, pp. 195–222.
32.
On the French nuclear development, see Bertrand Goldschmidt, The atomic adventure: its political and technical aspects, Oxford etc.: Pergamon Press1964;
33.
Bertrand Goldschmidt, La complexe atomique: Histoire politique de l'énergie nucléaire, Paris: Fayard1980;
34.
Dominique Saumon, and Louis Puiseux, ‘Actors and decisions in French energy policy’, in: Leon N Lindberg (ed.), The energy syndrome, Lexington, Ma.: Lexington Books, D.C. Heath & Co.1977, pp. 119–172.;
35.
N.J.D. Lucas, Energy in France: Planning, politics and policy, London: Europa Publications1979;
36.
Laurence Scheinman, Atomic energy policy in France under the Fourth Republic, Princeton, N.J.,: Princetown University Press1965.
37.
See the excellent study by Laurence Scheinman, op.cit (ref.21)
38.
On the British nuclear development, see C.M. Buckley and R. Day, ‘Nuclear reactor development in Britain’, in: Keith Pavitt (ed), Technical innovation and British economic performance, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan1980, pp. 252–266;
39.
Duncan Burn, The political economy of nuclear energy, London: Institute of Economic Affairs1967;
40.
Duncan Burn, Nuclear power and the energy crisis: Politics and the atomic iindustry, London and Basingstoke: Macmillan1978;
41.
Margaret Gowing (assisted by Lorna Arnold), Independence and deterrence: Britain and atomic energy 1945–1952, 2 vols., London and Basingstoke: Macmillan1974;
42.
Roger Williams, The nuclear power decisions: British policies 1953–78, London: Croom Helm1980.
43.
J.H. Cheshire et al., ‘Energy policy in Britain: A case study of adaption and change in a policy system’, in Leon N. Lindberg (ed.), The energy syndrome, Lexington, Ma.Lexington Books, D.C. Heath & Co.1977, pp. 33–62.
44.
Philip Gummett, Scientists in Whitehall, Manchester: Manchester University Press1980, p. 125.
45.
Howard J. Rush, Gordon MacKerron, and John Surrey, ‘The advanced gas-cooled reactor: A case study in reactor choice’, Energy Policy, Vol. 5, No. 2, June 1977, pp. 95–105.
46.
Marian Radetzki, Uranium: A strategic source of energy,London: Croom Helm1981.
47.
Man Lönnroth, and William Walker, op. cit. (ref. 16).
48.
Martin Spence, ‘Nuclear capital’, Capital and Class, No. 16, Spring 1982, pp. 5–40 (here: p.20).
49.
Claus Offe, Strukurprobleme des kapitalistischen Staates, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp1972;
50.
Claus Offe, “Crises of crisis management”: Elements of a political crisis theory’, International Journal of Politics, Vol. 6, No. 3, 1976, pp. 29–67.
51.
James O'Connor, The fiscal crisis of the state, New York: St. Martin's Press1973;
52.
Jürgen Habermas, Legitimation crisis, London: Heinemann1976.
53.
Peter de Leon, op. cit. (ref. 13), p. 229.
54.
See, for example, Joachim Hirsch, Wissenschaftlich-technischer Fortschritt und politisches System: Organisation and Grundlagen administrativer Wissenschaftsförderung in der BRD, Frankfurt/Main: Surhkamp1970;
55.
Joachim Hirsch, Staatsapparat und Reproduktion des Kapitals, Frankfurt/ Main: Surhkamp1974; Ulrich Rödel, op. cit. (ref. 5).
56.
Claus Offe, op.cit. (ref. 30), pp. 124–125 (my translation).
57.
Martin Spence, op. cit. (ref. 29), pp. 12–14.
58.
Roy Lewis, ‘Nuclear power and employment rights’, Industrial Law Joumal, Vol. 1, No. 1, March 1978, pp. 1–15; see also Dave Elliott et al, The politics of nuclear power, London: Pluto Press 1978.
59.
David Elliott, Energy options and employment, London: Centre for Alternative Industrial and Technological Systems, North East London Polytechnic1979.
60.
David Pearce, Employment and energy futures in the UK;An analysis of the CAITS scenario, Aberdeen: Department of Political Economy, University of Aberdeen1979.
61.
This point of view is put forward, for example, by Helga Bufe, and Jürgen Grumbach, op.cit. ref.20.
62.
For a presentation and thorough critique of this view, see Stefan Lob, ‘Atomenergie - Zur Struktur eines gesellschaftlichen Konflikts’, in Heinz Hülsmann, and Robert Tschiedel (eds.), Kernenergie und wissenschaftliche Verantwortung, Kronberg/Ts.: Athenäum1977, pp. 123–154.
63.
Lutz Mez, and Wolfgang Rüdig, Energiediskussion in Europa: Berichte und Dokumente über die Haltung der Regierungen und Parteien in der Europäischen Gemeinschaft zur Kernenergie, Villingen: Neckar Verlag1979.
64.
Harry Braverman, Labor and monopoly capital: The degradation of work in the twentieth century, New York: Monthly Review Press1974.
65.
For analyses in this vein, see Harley Shaiken, ‘Neue Technologien und Organisation der Arbeit’, Leviathan, Vol. 8, No. 2, August 1980, pp. 190–211;
66.
CSE Microelectronics Group, Microelectronics: Capitalist technology and the working class, London: CSE Books1980.
67.
See, for example, Feliks Gross, ‘Some social consequences of atomic discovery’, American Sociological Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, February 1950, pp. 43–50.
68.
BSSRS Politics of Energy Group, Nuclear power - The rigged debate, London: British Society for Social Responsibility in Science1981;
69.
Les Levidov, ‘Review of “The Nuclear State” (by Robert Jungk)’, Head and Hand, No. 4, Spring 1980.
70.
Les Levidov, ‘Controlling nuclear technology’ in: Gari Donn (ed), Missiles, Reactors and Civil Liberties: Against the Nuclear State, Glasgow, Scottish Council for Civil Liberties, not dated, pp. 34–37.
71.
BSSRS Politics of Energy Group, op. cit. (ref. 44), pp. 23.
72.
Les Levidov, op. cit. ‘Review of “The Nuclear State”’ (ref. 44).
73.
Martin Spence, op. cit. (ref. 29), p. 12.
74.
Otto Ullrich, Technik und Herrschaft vom Hand-werk zur verdinglichten Blockstruktur industrieller Gesellschaft, Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp1977;-
75.
Otto Ullrich, Weltniveau: In der Sackgasse des Industriesystems, West Berlin: Rotbuch Verlag1979.
76.
Norbert Kapferer, ‘Small is beatuiful - eine onlose Utopie?’Leviathan, Vol. 6, No. 2, July 1978, pp. 314–323.
77.
Hassenpflug has pointed out, that ‘science and technology’ are according to Marx not synonymous with ‘productive forces’. Science and technology can have both ‘productive’ and ‘destructive’ effects. See Dieter Hassenpflug, ‘Marxismus und Industriekritik: Otto Ullrichs “Weltniveau” und der marx’ sche Begriff der Industriekritik’, PROKLA 40 (Vol. 10, No. 3), 1980, pp. 114–130.
78.
Stefan Lob, op. cit. (ref. 39), p. 135;
79.
Lutz Mez, ‘Der atom-industrielle Komplex’, in: Hans-Christian Buchholtz, Lutz Mez, and Thomas von Zabern, Widerstand gegen Atomkraftvierke, Wuppertal: Peter Hammer Verlag1978, pp. 11–25:
80.
Erich Kitzmüller, ‘Wachstum der Produktiv- oder Destruktivkräfte?’ in Lutz Mez, and Manfred Wilke (eds), Der Atomfilz: Gewerkschaften und Atomkraft, West Berlin: Olle & Wolter1977, S. 77–91.
81.
Amory B. Lovins, Soft energy paths: Towards a durable peace, Harmondsworth: Penguin1977.
82.
Volmar Lauber, ‘Ecology politics and liberal democracy’, Government and Opposition, Vol. 13, No. 2, Spring 1978, pp. 199–217.
83.
Thies Gleiss, and Winfried Wolf, Der Atomverein nach Hanisburg, Frankfurt/Main: ISP Verlag1980, p. 93.
84.
Wolfgang Sassin, ‘Energy’, Scientific American, Vol. 243, No. 3, September 1980, pp. 107–117.
85.
Wolf Häfele, ‘Hypotheticality and the new challenges: The pathfinder role of nuclear energy’, Minerva, Vol. 12, 1974, pp. 303–322 (here: p.317);
86.
Cp. also Alvin M. Weinberg, ‘Science and trans-science’, Minerva, Vol. 10, 1972, pp. 209–222.
87.
Martin Jänicke, Wie das Industriesystem von seinen Mipsstanden profitiert, Kosten und Nutzen technokratischer Symptombekämpfung; Unnueltschutz, Gesundheitswesen, innere Sicherheit, Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag1979.
88.
Alwin M. Weinberg, ‘Social institutions and nuclear energy’, in: John Francis, and Paul Albrecht (eds.) Facing up to nuclear power, Edinburgh: St. Andrew Press1976, pp. 21–39.
89.
E.P. Thompson, The making of the English working class, Harmondsworth: Penguin1968, pp. 253–256.
90.
Maurice Frankel, The alkali inspectorate: The control of industrial air pollution, London: Social Audit1974.
91.
Raymond Williams, The Country and the City, London: Chatto & Windus1973.
92.
See Howard Hill, Freedom to roam: The struggle for access to Britain's moors and mountains, Ashbourne, Derbyshire: Moorland Publishing Company1980;
93.
Paul Salveson, Will you come o' Sunday momin? The 1896 battle for Winter Hill, Bolton: Red Rose Publishing1982.
94.
Craig R. Littler, The development of the labour process in comparative perspective: A comparative study of the transformation of work organization in Britain, Japan and USA, London: Heinemann Educational Books1982.
95.
Wolfgang Rüdig, ‘Public protest against nuclear energy: Some international comparisons’ Unpublished paper, Department of Liberal Studies in Science, Manchester University 1982.
96.
Stephen Cotgrove, Catastrophe or cornucopia: The environment, politics and the future, Chichester etc: Wiley1982, pp. 18–20.
97.
Frank Parkin, Middle class radicalism: The British Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament, Manchester: Manchester University Press1968.
98.
Joseph Huber, Wer soil das alles andem: Die Alternativen der Alternativbewegung, West Berlin: Rotbuch Verlag1980.
99.
Andrew Duff, and Stephen Cotgrove, ‘Social values and the choice of careers in industry’, Journal of Occupational Psychology, Vol. 55, 1982, pp. 97–107.
100.
Langdon Winner, Autonomous technology: Technics-out-of-control as a theme in political thought, Cambridge, Ma./London: MIT Press1977, pp. 329–331.
101.
Martin Spence, op. cit. (ref. 29), p. 36.
102.
Joseph Huber, op. cit. (ref. 67).
103.
Dave Eliott et al., op. cit. (ref. 35).
104.
Manfred Wilke, Die Funktionäre, Munich: Piper1980.
105.
Lutz Mez, and Manfred Wilke, (eds). Der Atomfilz: Gewerkschaften und Atomkraft, West Berlin: Olle & Wolter1977;
106.
Jörg Hallerbach (ed), Die eigentliche Kernspaltung: Gewerkschaften und Bürgerinitiativen im Streit um die Atomkraft, Darmstadt/Neuwied: Luchterhand1978;
107.
Herbert Kitschelt, op.cit. (ref. 20).
108.
Tony Chafer, ‘The anti-nuclear movement and the rise of political ecology’, in: Philip G. Cerny (ed.), Social movements and protest in France, London: Francis Pinter1982, pp. 202–220.
109.
Christel Hartmann et al., ‘Grundstrukturen gewerkschaftliche Politik in Frankreich’, in: Werner Olle (ed.), Einführung in die international Gewerkschaftspolitik, Vol. 2,West Berlin: Olle & Wolter1978, pp. 8–48.
110.
Claude-Marie Vadrot, L'écologie, histoire d'une subversion, Paris: Syros1978, pp. 184–192.
111.
J. S Eisenhammer, ‘The French Communist Party, the General Confederation of Labour, and the nuclear debate’, West European Politics, Vol. 4, No. 3, October 1981, pp. 252–266.
112.
N.J.D Lucas, op cit. (ref, 21)p. 173.
113.
Alain Tourainewel. al., Anti-nuclear protest: The opposition to nuclear energy in France, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Paris: Maison des Sciences de l'Homme 1983.
114.
Colin Sweet and Anna Coote, ‘Energy: Frank Chappie's fantasy’, New Statesman, Vol. 102, No. 2644, 20th November, 1981, pp. 6–8.
115.
Wolfgang Rüdig, British political parties and trade unions on nuclear power: A documentation of motions and resolutions, West Berlin: Institut für Zukunftsforschung1980 (mimeo);
116.
David Elliott, Trade union policy and nuclear power (Technology Policy Group Occasional Paper No. 3), Milton Keynes: Technology Policy Group, Open University1981.
117.
John F. Carroll and Petra K. Kelly, (eds) Nuclear Ireland?Dublin: Brindley Dollard, 1980;
118.
Lothar Meyer and Petra Kelly, ‘Trades Unions and Nuclear Power: Ireland-Germany-Australia’, New Ecologist, No. 3, May/June 1978, pp. 95–97.
119.
Thijs de la Court, Deborah Pick and Daniel Nordquist, The nuclear fix: A guide to nuclear activities in the third world, Amsterdam: World Information Service on Energy (WISE)1982, p.27.
120.
Joseph Camilleri, ‘Nuclear controversy in Australia: The uranium campaign', Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, Vol. 35, No. 4, April 1979, pp. 40–44.
121.
Lothar Meyer and Petra Kelly, op. cit., (ref. 83); Financial Times, 9th December, 1981.
122.
Cp. Michael Pollak, ‘Die westeuropäischen Gewerkschaften im Spannungsfeld technologiepolitischer Entscheidungen: Das Beispiel der Auseinandersetzung um die Atomenergie’, Journal für Sozialforschung, Vol. 21, No. 2, 1981, pp. 123–140.
123.
Alain Touraine et al., op.cit. (ref. 80).
124.
Richard Kazs and Richard L. Grossman, Fear at work: Job blackmail, labor and the environment, New York: The Pilgrim Press1982.
125.
Martin Spence, op. cit. (ref. 29), p. 19.
126.
Alain Touraine et al., op cit. (ref. 80).
127.
Critiques of the US anti-nuclear movement (and responses to them) cover similar ground as the debates reported by Alain Touraine et al. for France and often touch on a similar note as Spence, s. Jeff Pector, ‘The nuclear power industry and the anti-nuclear movement’, Socialist Review, No. 42, November/December 1978, pp. 9–35;
128.
Marcy Darnovsky, ‘A strategy for the anti-nuclear movement: Response to Pector’, Socialist Review, No. 49, 1979, 119–127;
129.
Stephen Vogel, ‘The limits of protest; A critique of the anti-nuclear movement’, Socialist Review, No. 54, November-December 1980, pp. 125–134;
130.
Liv Smith, ‘Labor and the no-nukes movement’, Socialist Review, No. 54, November/December 1980, pp. 135–149.
