This paper explores the connection between the current wave of populism, economic policies and governance practices. We first review the different ways in which populist political economy has been conceptualised, focusing on the relationship between populism and neoliberalism in terms of both policy and polity. We then briefly discuss right-wing populist governments’ recent economic policies and institutional changes. We argue that, while representing a continuation of neoliberalism in some areas, right-wing populism may, when in power, undermine neoliberal economic policies and institutional power by subverting governance norms and reintroducing the state as a major actor in the economy. To demonstrate and support our argument, we analyse the Israeli case, in which the right-wing populist leader Benjamin Netanyahu led three governmental coalitions between 2009 and 2019. We focus on the Israeli government’s response to the cost-of-living crisis and the housing crisis. We show that the populist Israeli government went beyond clientelism and welfare chauvinism and moved towards a more redistributive and expansionist economic agenda. To finance and legislate this agenda, it used unorthodox, short-term governance practices to bypass or overcome institutional limitations.
AytaçSEÖnişZ (2014) Varieties of populism in a changing global context: The divergent paths of Erdoğan and Kirchnerismo. Comparative Politics47(1): 41–59.
BarkatA (2019, June21) ‘Bhirey Agaf Taktzivim lamancal: Hahzer et hayahasim lepasim miktzoyiim’ [Top finance ministry officials to the director: Return relations to professional basis]. Globes, 21June. Available at: https://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1001290491
17.
BedirhanoğluP (2022) Economic management under the presidential system of government in Turkey: Beyond the depoliticization versus repoliticisation dichotomy. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies24(1): 97–113.
18.
BickertonCAccettiCI (2017) Populism and technocracy: Opposites or complements?Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy20(2): 186–206.
19.
BluhmKVargaA (2020) Conservative developmental statism in East Central Europe and Russia. New Political Economy25(4): 642–659.
20.
BohleDGreskovitsB (2019) Politicising embedded neoliberalism: Continuity and change in Hungary’s development model. West European Politics42(5): 1069–1093.
21.
BondyASMaggorE (2024) Balancing the scales: Labour incorporation and the politics of growth model transformation. New Political Economy29(1): 22–41.
22.
BozkurtU (2013) Neoliberalism with a human face: Making sense of the Justice and Development Party’s neoliberal populism in Turkey. Science and Society77(3): 372–396.
23.
BrownW (2015) Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24.
BurnhamP (2014) Depoliticisation: Economic crisis and political management. Policy & Politics42(2): 189–206.
25.
CanovanM (2004) Populism for political theorists?Journal of Political Ideologies9(3): 241–252.
26.
CaramaniD (2017) Will vs. reason: The Populist and technocratic forms of political representation and their critique to party government. American Political Science Review111: 54–67.
27.
CardosoFHFalettoE (1979) Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.
CianciaraAK (2021) (De-)legitimating differentiated (dis)integration in the European Union: Between technocratic and populist narratives.Journal of Contemporary European Research17: 128–146.
32.
CohenE (2021) Regulating demand or supply: Examining Israel’s public policy for reducing housing prices during 2015–2019. Housing Policy Debate32(3): 533–548.
33.
CsehiR (2019) Neither episodic, nor destined to failure? The endurance of Hungarian populism after 2010. Democratization26(6): 1011–1027.
34.
CzechSKassnerM (2021) Counter-movement at a critical juncture: A neo-Polanyian interpretation of the rise of the illiberal Right in Poland. Intersections: East European Journal of Society and Politics7(2): 128–148.
35.
DavisAE (2020) Waves of populism: A recent manifestation of Polanyi’s ‘double movement’?Journal of Economic Issues54(2): 398–403.
36.
Di TellaTS (1965) Populism and reform in Latin America. In: VelizC (ed.) Obstacles to Change in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 47–74.
37.
DönmezPEZemandlEJ (2019) Crisis of capitalism and (de-) politicisation of monetary policymaking: Reflections from Hungary and Turkey. New Political Economy24(1): 125–143.
38.
DornbuschREdwardsS (1991) The macroeconomics of populism. In: DornbuschREdwardsS (eds) The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 7–13.
Ennser-JedenastikL (2016) A welfare state for whom? A group-based account of the Austrian Freedom party’s social policy profile. Swiss Political Science Review22(3): 409–427.
41.
FabryA (2019) Neoliberalism, crisis and authoritarian–ethnicist reaction: The ascendancy of the Orbán regime. Competition & Change23(2): 165–191.
42.
FengerM (2018) The social policy agendas of populist radical right parties in comparative perspective. Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy34(3): 188–209.
43.
FilcD (2006) Populism and Hegemony in Israel. Tel Aviv: Resling.
44.
FilcD (2009) The Political Right in Israel: Different Faces of Jewish Populism. Abingdon: Routledge.
45.
FilcD (2018) Political radicalization in Israel: From a populist habitus to radical right populism in government. In: SteinerKÖnnerforsA (eds) Expressions of Radicalization: Global Politics, Processes and Practices. Cham: Springer International Publishing, pp. 121–145.
FischerAM (2020) The dark sides of social policy: From neoliberalism to resurgent right-wing populism. Development and Change51: 371–397.
48.
FischerDFlugK (2007) The role of rules in fiscal consolidation: Fiscal rules in Israel since the 1990S. In: ECB and the Banca de Espana Euro-Mediterranean Conference, Valencia, 28 March.
49.
FosterRGrzymskiJBrusenbauch MeislováM (2021) The limits of European legitimacy: On populism and technocracy. Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Contemporary European Research17: 75–86.
50.
FoucaultM (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the College de France, 1978-79 / Michel Foucault (ed. SenellartMEwaldFFontanaA. and trans. BurchellG). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
GananCMartinDIvanRM (2018) Análisis del Kirchnerismo Desde el Enfoque de Populismo Macroeconómico de Dornbusch y Edwards San Andres [Analysis of Kirchnerism from the Macroeconomic Populism Approach of Dornbusch and Edwards]. San Andres: Universidad de San Andres.
53.
GavinMMangerM (2023) Populism and De Facto Central Bank Independence. Comparative Political Studies56(8): 1189–1223.
54.
GermaniG (1962) Clases Populares y Democracia Representativa en Argentina [Popular classes and representative democracy in Argentina]. Desarrollo Economic2: 23–43.
55.
GidronNHallPA (2017) The politics of social status: Economic and cultural roots of the populist right. The British Journal of Sociology68(S1): 57–84.
56.
GrigeraJ (2017) Populism in Latin America: Old and New populisms in Argentina and Brazil. International Political Science Review38(4): 441–455.
57.
HarveyD (2007) A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
HawkinsKA (2009) Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies42(8): 1040–1067.
HopkinJ (2020) Anti-System Politics: The Crisis of Market Liberalism in Rich Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
61.
HopkinJBlythM (2019) The global economics of European populism: Growth Regimes and party system change in Europe. Government and Opposition54(2): 193–225.
62.
IbsenMF (2019) The populist conjuncture: Legitimation crisis in the age of globalized capitalism. Political Studies67(3): 795–811.
IvaldiGMazzoleniO (2020) Economic populism and sovereigntism: The economic supply of European radical right-wing populist parties. European Politics and Society21(2): 202–218.
67.
KalbD (2018) Upscaling illiberalism: Class, contradiction, and the rise and rise of the populist right in post-socialist Central Europe. Fudan Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences11(3): 303–321.
68.
KaufmanRRStallingsB (1991) The political economy of Latin American populism. In: DornbuschREdwardsS (eds) The Macroeconomics of Populism in Latin America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 15–43.
69.
KielyR (2020) Assessing conservative populism: A new double movement or neoliberal populism?Development and Change51(2): 398–417.
70.
KnightA (1998) Populism and Neo-Populism in Latin America, especially Mexico. Journal of Latin American Studies30(2): 223–248.
71.
KurkiM (2011) Democracy through technocracy? Reflections on technocratic assumptions in EU democracy promotion discourse. Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding5(2): 211–234.
72.
LaclauE (2005) On Populist Reason. New York: Verso Books.
73.
LaviZ (2017) ‘Ushar: Shar Haminimum Yaale Le 5300 Shelkel Hahel Meseptember’ [Approved: The minimum wage will rise to 5,300 NIS starting of September]. Ynet, 24October. Available at: https://www.ynet.co.il/articles/0,7340,L-5033072,00.html
MadariagaA (2020) Neoliberal Resilience: Lessons in Democracy and Development from Latin America and Eastern Europe. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
76.
MadraYMYılmazS (2019) Turkey’s decline into (civil) war economy: From neoliberal populism to corporate nationalism. South Atlantic Quarterly118(1): 41–59.
77.
MamanDRosenhekZ (2007) The politics of institutional reform: The ‘Declaration of Independence’ of the Israeli Central Bank. Review of International Political Economy14(2): 251–275.
78.
MamanR (2019) ‘Holam Lo Mevin Et Haotzma Shel Hacalcala Hyisreelit’ [The world does not understand the strength of the Iseali economy]. Makor Rishon, 5December. Available at: https://www.makorrishon.co.il/news/188377/ (accessed 11 July 2023).
79.
MandelkernR (2015) What made economists so politically influential? Governance-related ideas and institutional entrepreneurship in the economic liberalisation of Israel and beyond. New Political Economy20(6): 924–941.
80.
MandelkernROrenT (2023) Credible interventionism: Economic ideas of government and macroeconomic policy in the Great Recession. New Political Economy28(1): 76–90.
81.
MiklósSSimonsJ (2022) How Orbán won? Neoliberal disenchantment and the grand strategy of financial nationalism to reconstruct capitalism and regain autonomy. Socio-Economic Review20(4): 1625–1651.
MoffitBTormeyS (2014) Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies62(2): 381–397.
85.
MoffittB (2015) How to perform crisis: A model for understanding the key role of crisis in contemporary populism. Government and Opposition50(2): 189–217.
86.
MualamN (2018) Playing with supertankers: Centralization in land use planning in Israel – A national experiment underway. Land Use Policy75: 269–283.
87.
MuddeC (2004) The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition39(4): 541–563.
88.
MuddeCKaltwasserCR (2017) Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
89.
MüllerJW (2016) What Is Populism?University of Pennsylvania Press.
90.
NolandM (2020) Protectionism under Trump: The China Shock, deplorables, and the first white president. Asian Economic Policy Review15(1): 31–50.
91.
OECD (2020) Earnings: Real minimum wages (Edition 2019). OECD Employment and Labour Market Statistics (Database). DOI: 10.1787/522a6b71-en.
92.
OECD (2021a) Average annual wages. OECD employment and labour market statistics (Database). DOI: 10.1787/data-00571-en.
93.
OECD (2021b) Earnings: Minimum wages relative to median wages (Edition 2020). OECD employment and labour market statistics (Database). DOI: 10.1787/72d649a6-en.
94.
OECD (2021c) General government debt (indicator). DOI: 10.1787/a0528cc2-en.
95.
OECD (2021d) General government deficit (indicator). DOI: 10.1787/77079edb-en.
96.
OECD (2021e) General government spending (indicator). DOI: 10.1787/a31cbf4d-en.
97.
ÖnişZ (2019) Turkey under the challenge of state capitalism: The political economy of the late AKP era. Southeast European and Black Sea Studies19(2): 201–225.
98.
OrensteinMABugaričB (2022) Work, family, fatherland: The political economy of populism in Central and Eastern Europe. Journal of European Public Policy29(2): 176–195.
99.
OtjesSIvaldiGJupskåsAR, et al. (2018) It’s not economic interventionism, stupid! Reassessing the political economy of radical right-wing populist parties. Swiss Political Science Review24(3): 270–290.
100.
PilotA (2018) Bahit Lesheavar Baotzar: Hidarderut Kasha Batarbut Hairgunit, Rashey Agafim Lo Medabrim’ [Former finance ministry official: A severe deterioration in the ministry organization practices, department heads aren’t talking]. Calcalist, 14May. Available at: https://www.calcalist.co.il/local/articles/0,7340,L-3738063,00.html
RodrikD (2018a) Is populism necessarily bad economics?AEA Papers and Proceedings108: 196–199.
103.
RodrikD (2018b) Populism and the economics of globalization. Journal of International Business Policy1(1): 12–33.
104.
RogenhoferJMPanievskyA (2020) Antidemocratic populism in power: Comparing Erdoğan’s Turkey with Modi’s India and Netanyahu’s Israel. Democratization27(8): 1394–1412.
105.
ScheiringG (2021) Varieties of dependency, varieties of populism: Neoliberalism and the populist countermovements in the Visegrád Four. Europe-Asia Studies73(9): 1569–1595.
106.
ScheiringG (2022) The national-populist mutation of neoliberalism in dependent economies: The case of Viktor Orbán’s Hungary. Socio-Economic Review20(4): 1597–1623.
107.
ScottJA (2022) ‘There is no alternative’? The role of depoliticisation in the emergence of populism. Politics42(3): 325–339.
108.
SebőkMSimonsJ (2022) How Orbán won? Neoliberal disenchantment and the grand strategy of financial nationalism to reconstruct capitalism and regain autonomy. Socio-Economic Review20(4): 1625–1651.
109.
ShapiroJ (1989) Lashilton Bhartanu [You have Chosen Us to Rule]. Tel Aviv: Am-Oved.
110.
ShieldsS (2019) The paradoxes of necessity: Fail forwards neoliberalism, social reproduction, recombinant populism and Poland’s 500 plus policy. Capital and Class43(4): 653–669.
111.
SlobodianQ (2018) Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
112.
StankovP (2018) The political economy of populism: An empirical investigation. Comparative Economic Studies60(2): 230–253.
113.
StankovP (2021) The Political Economy of Populism: An Introduction. New York: Routledge.
SzabóJ (2020) First as tragedy, then as farce: A comparative study of right-wing populism in Hungary and Poland. Journal of Comparative Politics13(2): 24–42.
116.
SzikraD (2018) Welfare for the Wealthy. The Social Policy of the Orbán-Regime, 2010–2017 (FES Analysis). Budapest: Friedrich-Ebert-Stiftung.
117.
TaggartPKaltwasserCR (2016) Dealing with populists in government: Some comparative conclusions. Democratization23(2): 345–365.
118.
ToplišekA (2020) The political economy of populist rule in post-crisis Europe: Hungary and Poland. New Political Economy25(3): 388–403.
119.
VilasCM (1992) Latin American Populism: A structural approach. Science and Society56(4): 389–420. Available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40403299
120.
WacquantL (2012) Three steps to a historical anthropology of actually existing neoliberalism’. Anthropology20: 66–79.
ZasloveA (2008) Exclusion, community, and a populist political economy: The radical right as an anti-globalization movement. Comparative European Politics6(2): 169–189.
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
