Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Using machine learning and artificial intelligence, Uber has been disrupting the world taxi industry. However, the Uber algorithmic apparatus managed to perfectionize the scalable decentralized tracking and surveillance of mobile living bodies. This article examines the Uber surveillance machinery and discusses the determinants of its algorithmically powered ‘all-seeing power’. The latter is being figured as an Algopticon that reinvents Bentham’s panopticon in the era of the platform economy.

Keywords

algorithms geofencing human tracking system machine learning Montreal panopticon platform capitalism surveillance Uber

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bajaj

Sachdeva

Kovalev

(2017) General engineering. Uber.com, 13 March. Available at: https://eng.uber.com/real-time-id-check/

Bauman

(1999) On postmodern uses of sex. In: Featherstone

(ed.) Love and Eroticism. London: SAGE.

Bauman

Lyon

(2013) Liquid Surveillance. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Beinstein

Sumers

(2016) Uber data: How Uber engineering increases safe driving with telematics. Uber.com, 29 June. Available at: https://eng.uber.com/telematics/

Bell

(2017) Uber Technology Day: The life of a trip. Uber Engineering Youtube Channel. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GyS3m5SyRuQ

Boyne

(2000) Post-panopticism. Economy and Society 29(2): 285–307.

Brodsky

(2018) Uber Engineering: H3: Uber’s hexagonal hierarchical spatial index. Uber Technologies, 27 June. Available at: https://eng.uber.com/h3/

Caluya

(2010) The post-panoptic society? Reassessing Foucault in surveillance studies. Social Identities 16(5): 621–633.

Carino

(2018) Uber driver tracking and telematics. GEOTAB, 15 January. Available at: https://www.geotab.com/blog/uber-driver-tracking/

10.

CDFA (2017) CDFA certifies that Lyft, Uber measurement systems accurately establish consumer fares. California Department of Food and Agriculture. Available at: https://www.cdfa.ca.gov/egov/Press_Releases/Press_Release.asp?PRnum=17-045

11.

Cherry

(2016) Beyond misclassification: The digital transformation of work. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37(3): 577–602.

12.

Clarke

(1988) Information technology and dataveillance. Communications of the ACM 35(5): 498–512.

13.

Corriveau

(2016) L’industrie du taxi part en guerre. LeDevoir, 14 September. Available at: https://www.ledevoir.com/politique/montreal/479876/saisie-de-huit-vehicules-d-uber

14.

Danaher

(2016) The threat of algocracy: Reality, resistance and accommodation. Philosophy and Technology 29(3): 245–268.

15.

De Stefano

(2016) The rise of the just-in-time workforce: On-demand work, crowdwork and labour protection in the gig-economy. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37(3): 471–504.

16.

Dey

(2018) Uber marketplace: Location serving & storage in the Uber marketplace. Uber Engineering, 24 April. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AzptiVdUJXg&t=3s

17.

Dobson

Fisher

(2007) The panopticon’s changing geography. The Geographical Review 97(3): 307–323.

18.

Durand

J-P

(2004) La chaîne invisible, Travailler aujourd’hui: Flux tendu et servitude volontaire. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, p. 396.

19.

Elert

Henrekson

(2016) Evasive entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics 47(1): 95–113.

20.

Elmer

(2003) A diagram of panoptic surveillance. New Media & Society 5(2): 231–247.

21.

Foucault

(1977) Punish and Discipline: The Birth of the Prison. New York: Vintage Books.

22.

Geertz

(1973) Thick description. In: Geertz

(ed.) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basics Books, pp. 3–32.

23.

Gilley

(2018) H3: Tiling the earth with hexagons. Uber Engineering, 22 Janvier. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ay2uwtRO3QE

24.

Gorripaty

(2018) Uber Tech Day: What’s my ETA? The billion dollar question. Uber Engineering, 5 June. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=4&v=FEebOd-Pdwg

25.

Greenfield

(2017) Smartphone: The networking of the self. In: Greenfield

(ed.) Radical Technologies: The Design of Everyday Life. London: Verso Books, p. 359.

26.

Haggerty

(2006) Tear down the walls: On demolishing the panopticon. In: Lyon

(ed.) Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing, pp. 23–45.

27.

Haggerty

Ericson

(2000) The surveillant assemblage. British Journal of Sociology 51(4): 605–622.

28.

Isaac

(2017) How Uber deceives the authorities worldwide. The New York Times, 3 March. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/03/technology/uber-greyball-program-evade-authorities.html

29.

Jamil

(2017) Drivers Vs Uber–The limits of the Judicialization: Critical review of London’s employment tribunal verdict in the case of Aaslam Y. & Farrar J. against Uber. Revue Interventions Économiques. Papers in Political Economy 58.

30.

Kadous

(2017) Introduction to machine learning at Uber. Uber Engineering, 28 September. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ydsrZcKLqi0

31.

Kenney

Zysman

(2016) What is the future of work? Understanding the platform economy and computation-intensive automation. BRIE Working Paper 2016-9, December. Berkley Roundtable on the International Economy. Available at: https://brie.berkeley.edu/sites/default/files/brie-wp-2016-9.pdf

32.

Kokalitcheva

(2018) Uber begins monitoring U.S. driver background checks continuously. AXIOS, 13 July. Available at: https://www.axios.com/uber-begins-monitoring-us-driver-background-checks-continuously-180d59db-1040-48a7-b9fb-0b6e06ba299f.html

33.

Lyon

(2006) The search for surveillance theories. In: Lyon

(ed.) Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond. Portland, OR: Willan Publishing, pp. 3–20.

34.

Mathiesen

(1997) The viewer society: Michel Foucault’s ‘panopticon’ revisited. Theoretical Criminology 1(2): 215–234.

35.

Meredith

Sorkin

(2018) Uber CEO Khosrowshahi wants passengers to be able to ‘opt-in’ to a higher quality of service . . . not just a nicer car. CNBC, 23 January. Available at: https://www.cnbc.com/2018/01/23/uber-ceo-khosrowshahi-wants-passengers-to-be-able-to-opt-in-to-a-higher-quality-of-service.html

36.

Morozov

(2013) The real privacy problem. MIT Technology Review, 22 October. Available at: https://www.technologyreview.com/s/520426/the-real-privacy-problem/

37.

O’Neil

(2016) Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. New York: Broadway Books.

38.

Prassl

Risak

(2015) Uber, taskrabbit, and co.: Platforms as employers-rethinking the legal analysis of crowdwork. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37(3): 619–652.

39.

Risak

Warter

(2015) Legal strategies towards fair conditions in the virtual sweatshop. In: Paper presented at the IV Regulating for Decent Work conference, ILO, Geneva, 8–10 July 2015. Available at: http://www.rdw2015.org/download

40.

Rosenblat

Stark

(2016) Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: A case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication 10: 3758–3784.

41.

Silberman

Irani

(2016) Operating an employer reputation system: Lessons from Turkopticon, 2008–2015. Comparative Labor Law & Policy Journal 37(3): 505–541.

42.

Srnicek

(2016) Platform Capitalism. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.

43.

Standing

(2011) The Precariat: The New Dangerous Class. London; New York: Bloomsbury Academic.

44.

Sullivan

(2016) Curb your enthusiasm. Uber Newsroom, 26 January. Available at: https://www.uber.com/newsroom/curb-your-enthusiasm

45.

Sumers

(2018) [Uber marketplace] building Uber’s sensor nervous system: Ted Sumers. Uber Engineering, 19 October. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-iM2uVhVwbQ&index=2&list=PLLEUtp5eGr7B-93l7ZIRBfSfu96miKCrE

46.

Torpey

(2007) Product review: Through thick and thin – Surveillance after 9/11. Contemporary Sociology 36: 116–119.

47.

Tran

(2018) Uber Tech Day: Marketplace investments. Uber Engineering Youtube channel. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=87s6w13604U

48.

Tucker

(2017) Uber and the Unmaking and Remaking of Taxi Capitalism: Technology, Law and Resistance in Historical Perspective. Articles and Book Chapter. 2602. Available at: http://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/scholarly_works/2602

49.

Turakhia

(2017) Machine learning & the Uber marketplace. Uber Engineering, 28 September. Available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=20&v=Vv-tYg03xlU

50.

Uber Data (2017) Engineering more reliable transportation with machine learning and AI at Uber. Uber Engineering, 10 November. Available at: https://eng.uber.com/machine-learning/

51.

Uber Newsroom (2018) We ignite opportunity by setting the world in motion. Available at: https://www.uber.com/en-CA/newsroom/company-info/

52.

Weil

(2014) The Fissured Workplace. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

53.

Wells

Attoh

Cullen

(2017) The work lives of Uber drivers: Worse than you think. George Town University – Working Class perspectives. Available at: https://workingclassstudies.wordpress.com/2017/07/10/the-work-lives-of-uber-drivers-worse-than-you-think/

54.

Zarsky

(2011) Governmental data mining and its alternatives. Penn State Law Review 116(2): 285–330.

Uber and the making of an Algopticon - Insights from the daily life of Montreal drivers

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References