In this reflection, we assess the theoretical faultline running through the contested current of Corbynist thought and politics at present. On one hand, we find a techno-utopian strand preoccupied with automation and the end of work. On the other hand, a nascent politics of social reproduction with a foreshortened potential to realise the promise of a continental-style solidarity economics in the United Kingdom. Both represent the latest in a series of left attempts to confront the crisis of social democracy that rages across Europe, a crisis to which the British Labour Party has not been alone in succumbing despite recent appearances otherwise. Deindustrialisation collapsed labour’s role in everyday life, and a crisis in the society of work eventually passed over into its representative party’s electoral decline. Subsequent financial crisis and subsequent austerity have only made things worse. A poverty of ideas prevails that all sides of social democracy’s unsteady compromise seek desperately to solve. However, the recent UK General Election shows evidence that Corbynism has renewed Labour’s fortunes to some extent. Surveying the competing intellectual currents behind its rise, we suggest that the politics of social reproduction offer a better route forward for the Labour Party than the popular siren call of postcapitalism, and reflect on what the recent general election result suggests for their future development.
AdornoT (1999a) Marginalia to theory and praxis. In: AdornoT (ed.) Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 259–278.
2.
AdornoT (1999b) Resignation. In: AdornoT (ed.) Critical Models: Interventions and Catchwords. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 289–294.
3.
BakkerIGillS (2003) Power, Production and Social Reproduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
DinersteinAC (2017) Co-construction or prefiguration? Rethinking the ‘translation’ of SSE practices into policy. In NorthPScott CatoM (eds.) Towards just and sustainable economies: The social and solidarity economy North and South. Bristol: Policy Press, pp. 57–71.
GillS (2016) Critical global political economy and the global organic crisis. In: GillS (ed.) The Palgrave Handbook of Critical International Political Economy. Basingstoke: Palgrave, pp. 29–48.
HeinrichM (2013) The ‘fragment on machines’: A Marxian misconception in the Grundrisse and its overcoming in capital. In: BellofioreRStarostaGThomasP (eds) In Marx’s Laboratory: Critical Interpretations of the Grundrisse. Leiden: Brill, pp. 197–212.
NoysB (2012) The Persistence of the Negative: A Critique of Contemporary Continental Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34.
PainterAThoungC (2016) Creative Citizen, Creative State: The Principled and Pragmatic Case for a Universal Basic Income. London: Royal Society of the Arts.
PittsFH (2016a) A crisis of measurability? Critiquing post-operaismo on labour, value and the basic income. Capital & Class. Epub ahead of print 21September. DOI: 10.1177/0309816816665579
38.
PittsFH (2016b) Beyond the fragment: The postoperaist reception of Marx’s fragment on machines and its relevance today. School of Sociology, Politics and International Studies Working Paper Series, 2016–02. University of Bristol, Bristol.
PittsFHLombardozziLWarnerN (2017) Beyond Basic Income: Overcoming the Crisis of Social Democracy?Brussels: Foundation for European Progressive Studies. Available at: http://www.feps-europe.eu/en/publications/details/517
42.
ReedHLansleyS (2016) Universal Basic Income: An Idea Whose Time Has Come?London: Compass.
43.
SrnicekNHesterH (in press) After Work: What’s Left and Who Cares. London: Verso.
44.
SrnicekNWilliamsA (2015a) Inventing the Future. London: Verso.
45.
SrnicekNWilliamsA (2015b) Manifesto for an accelerationist politics. In: MackayRAvanessianA (eds) The Accelerationist Reader. Falmouth: Urbanomic, pp. 347–362.
