This article provides a critical examination of Michael Hardt and Antonio Negri’s and John Holloway’s theory of revolutionary subjectivity, and does so by applying their theories to the Occupy movement of 2011. Its central argument is that one should avoid collapsing ‘autonomist’ and ‘open’ Marxism, for whilst both approaches share Tronti’s insistence on the constituent role of class struggle, and also share an emphasis on a prefigurative politics that engages a non-hierarchical and highly participatory politics, there nevertheless remain some significant differences between their approaches. Ultimately, when applied to the Occupy movement, whilst their theory isn’t entirely unproblematic, I will argue that Hardt and Negri’s ‘autonomist’ approach offers the stronger interpretation, due mainly to their revised historical materialism.
BielerAMortonAD (2003) Globalisation, the state and class struggle: A ‘critical economy’ engagement with open Marxism. British Journal of Politics and International Relations5(4): 467–499.
4.
BonefeldW (2002) State, revolution and self-determination. In BonefeldWTischlerS (eds.) What is to be Done? Leninism, Anti-Leninist Marxism and the Question of Revolution Today. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 128–150.
5.
BonefeldW (2003) Human practice and perversion: Beyond autonomy and structure. In BonefeldW (ed.) Revolutionary Writing: Common Sense Essays in Post-Political Politics. New York: Autonomedia, pp. 73–85.
6.
BonefeldWGunnRPsychopedisK (1992) Introduction. In BonefeldW. (eds.) Open Marxism, Volume 1: Dialectics and History. London: Pluto, pp. ix–xx.
7.
BruffI (2009) The totalisation of human social practice: Open Marxists and capitalist social relations, Foucauldians and power relations. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations11(2): 332–251.
8.
CallinicosA (2005) Sympathy for the devil? John Holloway’s mephistophelian Marxism. Capital & Class85: 17–19.
9.
CalhounC (2013) Occupy Wall Street in perspective. The British Journal of Sociology64(1): 26–38.
10.
CasarinoCNegriA (2008) In Praise of the Common: A Conversation on Philosophy and Politics. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.
11.
ClarkeS (1991) ‘Introduction’, In ClarkeS (ed.) The State Debate. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 1–61.
12.
ClarkeS (2002) Class struggle and the working class: The problem of commodity fetishism. In DinersteinANearyM (eds.) The Labour Debate: An Investigation into the Theory and Practice of Capitalist Work. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 41–60.
13.
CleaverH (1993) From ‘within and against’ to ‘beyond’ capital: Comments on Werner Bonefeld’s paper ‘Integration and Transcendence’, unpublished manuscript, June–July1993.
14.
CleaverJ (1984) Introduction. In NegriAMarx Beyond Marx. Massachusetts: Bergin & Garvey, pp. xix–xxvii.
15.
CleaverJ (1992) The inversion of class perspective in Marxian theory: From valorisation to self-valorisation. In BonefeldW. (eds.) Open Marxism: Volume 2. London: Pluto, pp. 106–145.
Constanza-ChockS (2012) Mic check! Media cultures and the Occupy movement. Social Movement Studies11(3–4): 375–385.
18.
De AngelisM (1995) Beyond the technological and the social paradigms: A political reading of abstract labour as the substance of value. Capital & Class57: 105–135.
19.
De AngelisM (2005) How?!?! An essay on John Holloway’sChange the World without Taking Power. Historical Materialism13(4): 233–249.
20.
ForanJ (2012) Let us change the world without taking power violently. Journal of Classical Sociology12(2): 240–247.
21.
GitlinT (2013) Occupy’s predicament: The moment and the prospects for the movement. The British Journal of Sociology64(1): 3–25.
22.
HardtMNegriA (2000) Empire. Cambridge and Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
23.
HardtMNegriA (2004) Multitude. London: Penguin.
24.
HardtMNegriA (2009) Commonwealth. Cambridge and Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
25.
HardtMNegriA (2012) Declaration. New York: Argo.
26.
HargittaiE (2008) The digital reproduction of inequality. In GruskyD (ed.) Social Stratification. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 936–944.
27.
HarrisonO (2011) Negri, self-valorization, and the exploration of the common. Subjectivity4(1): 29–46.
HarveyD (2010) Commonwealth: An exchange. Artforum48(3): 210–221.
30.
HollowayJPicciottoS (1978) ‘Introduction’, In HollowayJPicciottoS (eds.) State and Capital: A Marxist Debate. London: Edward Arnold, pp. 1–32.
31.
HollowayJ (1989) Review of Toni Negri, Revolution Retrieved…. Capital & Class38: 122–124.
32.
HollowayJ (1991a) Capital is class struggle (and bears are not cuddly). In BonefeldWHollowayJ (eds.) Post-Fordism and Social Form. Basingstoke: Macmillan, pp. 170–176.
33.
HollowayJ (1991b) The state and everyday struggle. In ClarkeS (ed.) The State Debate. London: Palgrave, pp. 225–259.
34.
HollowayJ (1991c) In the beginning was the scream. Common Sense11: 69–79.
35.
HollowayJ (1993) Open Marxism, history and class struggle. Common Sense13: 76–86.
36.
HollowayJ (1995) From the scream of refusal to the scream of power: The centrality of work. In BonefeldWGunnRHollowayJetal. (eds.) Open Marxism: Volume 3. London: Pluto, pp. 155–182.
37.
HollowayJ (1998) Dignity’s revolt. In HollowayJPeláezE (eds.) Zapatista! Reinventing Revolution in Mexico. London: Pluto, pp. 159–199.
38.
HollowayJ (2002a) Change the World without Taking Power. London: Pluto.
39.
HollowayJ (2002b) The narrowing of Marxism: A comment on Simon Clarke’s comments. In DinersteinANearyM (eds.) The Labour Debate: An Investigation into the Theory and Practice of Capitalist Work. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 61–63.
40.
HollowayJ (2009) Negative and positive autonomism. Or why Adorno? Part 2. In HollowayJMatamorosFTischlerS (eds.) Negativity and Revolution: Adorno and Political Activism. London: Pluto, pp. 95–103.
41.
HollowayJ (2010) Crack Capitalism. London: Pluto.
42.
HollowayJ (2012) Reoccupying: John Holloway. The Occupied Times, 3July, online at http://theoccupiedtimes.org/?p=5752, accessed 27 June 2015.
43.
HollowayJSusenS (2013) Change the World by Cracking Capitalism? A critical encounter between John Holloway and Simon Susen. Sociological Analysis7(1): 23–42.
44.
KavadaA (2015) Creating the collective: social media, the Occupy movement and its constitution as a collective actor. Information, Communication and Society18(8): 1–15.
45.
McNaughtonC (2009) A critique of John Holloway’s Change The World Without Taking Power. Capital and Class32(2): 3–28.
46.
MarcosS (2001 [1994]) Five Hundred Years of Indigenous Resistance. In LeónJP (ed.) Our Word is Our Weapon: Selected Writings of Subcomandante Insurgente Marcos. New York. Serpent’s Tail, pp. 40–42.
47.
MinS-J (2015) Occupy Wall Street and Deliberation: Translating Theory to Practice. Communication, Culture & Critique8: 73–89.
48.
NearyM (2004 [1977]) Travels in Moishe Postone’s social universe: A contribution to a critique of political cosmology. Historical Materialism12(3): 239–260.
49.
NegriA (2005) Books for Burning; Between Civil War and Democracy in 1970s Italy. London: Verso.
50.
NegriA (2008) The Porcelain Workshop, trans. WedellN. Los Angeles: Semiotext.
51.
PickerillJKrinskyJ (2012) Why does Occupy matter?Social Movement Studies11(3–4): 279–287.
52.
RobertsJM (2002) From reflection to refraction: Opening up open Marxism. Capital & Class26(3): 87–116.
53.
SpenceM (2010) Form, fetish, and film: Revisiting Open Marxism. Capital & Class34(1): 99–106.
54.
SusenS (2012) ‘Open Marxism’ against and beyond the ‘Great Enclosure’? Reflections on how (not) to crack capitalism. Journal of Classical Sociology12(2): 281–331.
55.
ThompsonP (2005) Foundation and empire: A critique of Hardt and Negri. Capital & Class86: 99–135.
56.
TischlerS (2012) Revolution and detotalization: An approach to John Holloway’sCrack Capitalism. Journal of Classical Sociology12(2): 267–280.
57.
TrontiM (1979) Lenin in England. In Red Notes. Working Class Autonomy and the Crisis; Italian Marxist Texts of the Theory and Practice of a Class Movement 1964–1979. London: Red Notes, pp. 1–6.
58.
YoungKSchwartzM (2012) Can prefigurative politics prevail? The implications for movement strategy in John Holloway’sCrack Capitalism. Journal of Classical Sociology12(2) 220–239.
