This paper examines the historical evolution of housing in the context of US capitalism, highlighting the significance of homeownership as an ideology and social practice for the reproduction of hegemony in the USA. The paper challenges widely held views that identify public policy errors and government regulatory failures as primary causes of the recent housing boom and bust. Its purpose is to show how the subprime solution that triggered the housing collapse organically evolved out of the growth imperative to keep harnessing the socioeconomic benefits of homeownership. The demise of this model signals the failure of the profit-seeking system of privatized housing provision to overcome the limits of production based on capital.
AalbersMB (2009) Why the Community Reinvestment Act cannot be blamed for the subprime crisis. City & Community8(3): 346-50.
2.
AshcraftABSchuermanT (2008) Understanding the securitization of subprime mortgage credit. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Report318.
3.
BaxandallREwenE (2000) Picture Windows: How the Suburbs Happened. New York: Basic Books.
4.
BeauregardRA (2006) When America Became Suburban. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
5.
BravermanH (1974) Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century. New York: Monthly Review Press.
6.
ButtigiegJA (1995) Gramsci on civil society. boundary2 22(3): 1-32.
7.
CohenL (2003) A Consumers’ Republic: The Politics of Mass Consumption in Postwar America. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
8.
DaviesRD (1966) Housing Reform during the Truman Administration. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri Press.
9.
FarleyRFreyWH (1994) Changes in the segregation of whites from blacks during the 1980s: Small steps toward a more integrated society. American Sociological Review59(1): 23-45.
10.
FileneEA (1925) The Way Out: A Forecast of Coming Changes in American Business and Industry. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Page & Company.
11.
FloridaRLFeldmanMMA (1988) Housing in US Fordism. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research12(2): 187-210.
12.
GhoshP (2001) Gramscian hegemony: An absolutely historicist approach. History of European Ideas27: 1–43.
13.
GordonA (2005) The creation of homeownership: How New Deal changes in banking regulation simultaneously made homeownership accessible to whites and out of reach for blacks. The Yale Law Journal115(1): 186-226.
14.
GothamKF (2006) The secondary circuit of capital reconsidered: Globalization and the U.S. real estate sector. American Journal of Sociology112(1): 231–75
15.
GothamKF (2009) Creating liquidity out of spatial fixity: The secondary circuit of capital and the subprime mortgage crisis. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(2): 355–71.
16.
GramWS (1978) Credit saturation, secular redistribution and long-run stability. Journal of Economic Issues12(2): 307-27.
17.
GramsciA (1971) Selections from the Prison Notebooks, ed. and trans. HoareQNowell SmithG. New York: International Publishers.
18.
GramsciA (1996) Prison Notebooks, Volume II, ed. and trans. ButtigiegJA. New York: Columbia University Press.
19.
HackworthJWylyE (2003) Social polarization and the politics of low income mortgage lending in the United States. Geografiska Annaler85B(3): 149-165.
20.
HackworthJ (2007) The Neoliberal City: Governance, Ideology, and Development in American Urbanism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
21.
HarrissCL (1951) History and Policies of the Home Owners Loan Corporation. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research.
22.
HarveyD (1974) Class-monopoly rent, finance capital and the urban revolution. Regional Studies8(3-4): 239-55.
23.
HarveyD (1976) Labor, capital, and class struggle around the built environment in advanced capitalist societies. Politics & Society6: 265-95.
24.
HarveyD (1985) The Urbanization of Capital: Studies in the History and Theory of Capitalist Urbanization. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
25.
HughesHS (1977) Consciousness and Society: The Reorientation of European Social Thought 1890-1930. New York: Vintage Books.
26.
ImmergluckD (2009) Foreclosed: High Risk Lending, Deregulation, and the Undermining of America’s Mortgage Market. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
27.
IvanovaMN (2011) Consumerism and the crisis: Wither ‘the American dream’?Critical Sociology37(3).
28.
IvanovaMN (forthcoming) Money, housing, and world market: The dialectic of globalised production. Cambridge Journal of Economics, published online 13 February 2011. doi: 10.1093/cje/beq05310.1093/cje/beq053
29.
JacksonKT (1985) Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
30.
Joint Center for Housing Studies (2010) The State of Nation’s Housing 2010. Cambridge, M.A.: Joint Center for Housing Studies.
31.
KeithNS (1973) Politics and the Housing Crisis since 1930. New York: Universe Books.
32.
KemenyJ (1992) Housing and Social Theory. London and New York: Routledge.
33.
KimbleJ (2007) Insuring inequality: The role of the Federal Housing Administration in the urban ghettoization of African Americans. Law & Social Inquiry32(2): 399-434.
34.
KrugmanPR (2002) For richer. New York Times Magazine, 20October.
LysandrouP (forthcoming) Global inequality, wealth concentration and the subprime crisis: A Marxian commodity theory analysis. Development and Change, first published online: 26 Jan 2011, doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01680.x10.1111/j.1467-7660.2010.01680.x
37.
LukácsG (1966) Technology and social relations. New Left ReviewI/39: 27-34.
38.
LukácsG (1971) History and Class Consciousness: Studies in Marxist Dialectic. Cambridge, M.A.: The MIT Press.
39.
MarcuseP (2001) The Liberal/Conservative divide in the history of housing policy in the United States. Housing Studies16(6): 717-36.
40.
MarcuseP (2009) A critical approach to the subprime mortgage crisis in the United States: Rethinking the public sector in housing. City & Community8(3): 351-56.
41.
MarxKEngelsF (1975) Collected Works, Volume 23. New York: International Publishers.
42.
MarxK (1993 [1939]) Grundrisse: Foundations of the Critique of Political Economy. London: Penguin Books.
43.
MarxK (1991 [1894]) Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume III. London: Penguin Books.
44.
MayET (2000) Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era. New York: Basic Books.
45.
McCoyPARenuartE (2008) The Legal Infrastructure of Subprime and Nontraditional Home Mortgages. Cambridge. M.A.: Joint Center for Housing Studies.
46.
McQuaidK (1976) An American Owenite: Edward A. Filene and the parameters of industrial reform, 1890-1937. American Journal of Economics and Sociology35(1): 77-94.
47.
New York Times (2011) Sales of new homes reached a 47-year low in 2010. 27January, B10.
48.
SassenS (2009) When local housing becomes an electronic instrument: The global circulation of mortgages – a research note. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(2): 411-26.
49.
SchmittJ (2008) The decline of good jobs: How have jobs with adequate pay and benefits done?Challenge51(1): 5-25.
50.
SchwartzHM (2009) Subprime Nation: American Power, Global Capital, and the Housing Bubble. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press
51.
Sohn-RethelA (1978) Intellectual and Manual Labor: A Critique of Epistemology. London and Basingstoke: The Macmillan Press.
52.
StoneKVW (2010) The 30-year Prison. New York Times, 11August, A31.
53.
US Department of Housing and Urban Development (2000a) Homeownership: Progress and work remaining. December, Issue Brief No III, Washington, D.C.: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
54.
US Department of Housing and Urban Development (2000b) FHA’s impact on increasing homeownership opportunities for low-income minority families during the 1990s. December, Issue Brief No. IV, Washington, D.C.: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
55.
US Department of Housing and Urban Development (2000c) Curbing predatory home mortgage lending. Washington, D.C.: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
56.
US Department of Housing and Urban Development (2001) HUD’s affordable lending goals for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. January, Issue Brief No. V, Washington, D.C.: US Department of Housing and Urban Development.
57.
US Department of Housing and Urban Development and US Department of the Treasury (2011) The Obama administration’s efforts to stabilize the housing market and help American homeowners. February, Washington, D.C.: US Department of Housing and Urban Development and US Department of the Treasury.
58.
WellerC (2008) The erosion of middle-class economic security after 2001. Challenge51(1): 45–68.
59.
WhyteWHJr. (1956) The Organization Man. New York: Touchstone.
60.
WolfeA (1981) America’s Impasse: The Rise and Fall of the Politics of Growth. New York: Pantheon Books.
61.
WolffEN (2007) Recent trends in household wealth in the United States: Rising debt and the middle-class squeeze. Working Paper No. 502, Levy Economics Institute of Bard College.
62.
WylyEK. (2006) American home: Predatory mortgage capital and neighbourhood spaces of race and class exploitation in the United States. Geografiska Annaler88B(1): 105-32.
