This article examines attempts by the European Union to promote the convergence of the central and eastern European states, and looks at two instruments used in its pursuit: the conditionality requirements for membership of the EU, and the convergence criteria for membership of economic and monetary union. Using Hungary as an example, it demonstrates that there are times at which these instruments are effective; but at other times, they are undermined by the more pressing need to address domestic political priorities. It concludes that in the longer term, the need to comply with the convergence agenda is likely to take precedence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Almunia, J. (2005) ‘The euro and the new member states’, speech given by the European commissioner for financial and monetary affairs (speech 05/499) to the Kangaroo Group lunch debate, 13 September.
2.
BBC (2004) ‘Slovak police clamp down on Roma’, 25 February; online at <http://news.bbc.co.uk>, accessed 1 March 2007.
3.
Blanchard, O.J. (2006a) ‘Adjustment with the euro: The difficult case of Portugal’, MIT Department of Economics Working Paper no. 06–04, 11 November.
4.
Blanchard, O.J. (2006b) ‘A macroeconomic survey of Europe’, PDF available online at Massachusetts Institute of Technology website, <http://econ-www.mit.edu>, accessed 20 March 2007.
5.
Brender, A. & A. Drazen (2004) ‘Political budget cycles in new versus established democracies’, NBER Working Papers 10539 (National Bureau of Economic Research).
6.
Budapest Times (2005) ‘EU plans to scrap banking borders and offer consumers more choice’, vol. 20, no. 3, 14 May.
7.
CEC (2003) ‘Comprehensive monitoring report on Hungary's preparations for membership’.
CEC (2004b) ‘Report from the Commission: Hungary report prepared in accordance with Article 104(3) of the Treaty’ (ECFIN/125/04-EN).
10.
CEC (2006) ‘European economy convergence report’, DG for Economic and Financial Affairs, no. 1.
11.
Chance, D. & S. Peto (2007) ‘Police, rioters clash after Hungary protests’, Reuters, 15 March.
12.
Chance, D. & G. Szakacs (2006) ‘Hungary little political incentive for euro move’, Reuters, 6 September.
13.
Dimitrova, A. (2002) ‘Enlargement institution building and the EU's administrative capacity requirement’, West European Politics, vol. 25 no. 4, pp. 171-190.
14.
Eurobarometer (2006a) ‘Introduction of the euro in the new member states, analytical report: Wave 3’, Flash Eurobarometer, series no. 183. Fieldwork: 31 March-5 April.
15.
Eurobarometer (2006b) ‘Introduction of the euro in the new member states, analytical report: Wave 4’, Flash Eurobarometer, series no. 191. Fieldwork: September.
16.
Eurobarometer (2006c) ‘Eurobarometer 66: Public opinion in the European Union, first results’. Fieldwork: September-October.
17.
Grabbe, H. (2001) ‘How does Europeanisation affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 8 no. 6, pp. 1013-1031.
18.
Grabbe, H. (2002) ‘European Union conditionality and the acquis communautaire’, International Political Science Review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 249–268.
19.
Hibbs, D. (1977) ‘Political parties and macroeconomic policy’, American Political Science Review, vol. 71 December, pp. 1467–1487.
20.
Hodson, D. & I. Maher (2004) ‘Soft law and sanctions: Economic policy coordination and reform of the stability and growth pact’, Journal of European Public Policy, vo. 11, no. 5, pp. 798–813.
21.
Hope K. & G. Parker (2006) ‘Oldest profession boosts Greek output’, Financial Times, 28 September.
22.
Howarth, D. & P. Loedel (2004) ‘The ECB and the stability pact: Policeman and judge’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 11 no. 5, pp. 832-853.
23.
Hughes, J., G. Sasse & C. Gordon (2004) Europeanisation and Regionalisation in the EU's Enlargement to Central and Eastern Europe: The Myth of Conditionality (Palgrave Macmillan).
24.
Mattli, W. & T. Plumper (2002) ‘The demand side politics of EU enlargement: Democracy and the application for EU membership’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 9 no. 4, pp. 550-574.
25.
McKay, D. (2005) ‘Economic logic or political logic? Economic theory, federal theory and EMU’, Journal of European Public Policy, vol. 12 no. 3, pp. 528-544.
26.
Munchau, W. (2005) ‘Is the euro forever? As the strains turn to pain, its foundations look far from secure’, Financial Times, 8 June.
27.
Nordhaus W. D. (1975) ‘The political business cycle’, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 42 no. 2, pp. 169-190.
28.
Papdimitriou, D. & D. Phinnemore (2004) ‘Europeanisation, conditionality and domestic change: The twinning exercise and administrative reform in Romania’, Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 42 no. 3, pp. 319-39.
29.
Reuters (2006) ‘Hungary does not need euro target date—FINMIN’, 23 February.
30.
Sadurski, W. (2004) ‘Accession's democracy dividend: The impact of the EU enlargement upon democracy in the new member states of central and eastern Europe’, European Law Journal, vol. 10 no. 4, pp. 371-401.
31.
Schimmelfennig, F. (2001) ‘The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the eastern enlargement of the European Union’, International Organisation, vol. 55 no. 1, pp. 47-80.
32.
Szakacs, G. (2006) ‘Investors bet on Hungary PM, reforms surviving’, Reuters, 29 September.
33.
Times (2006) ‘True lies: Hungarian leader blurts out the truth on the economy’, 20 September.
34.
‘Treaty of Accession concerning the Accession of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania to the European Union’ (2005) Official Journal of the European Union, vol. 48, 21 June, L157.
35.
Tufte, E. (1978) Political Control of the Economy (Princeton University Press).
